Irish Insanity
Well-known member
- Messages
- 9,885
- Reaction score
- 584
ND opponents went 7L / 3W / 2 Byes this Saturday.
At least we didn't lose. But there's always next week.
ND opponents went 7L / 3W / 2 Byes this Saturday.
I have been keeping an eye on Mock draft this year since Kizer was considered by Kiper to go first round -
He still has Kizer going first round. IMO, Kizer needs one more year unless he proves differently these last few games. His timing is a bit off and his decision making is not as quick as last year's.
It's tough though...a lot of kids come back to school to work on those things to improve their stock. Kizer is already being projected 1st QB taken.
Aside from going for a NC and finishing school (if he hasn't) then there's not much incentive to stay.
It's tough though...a lot of kids come back to school to work on those things to improve their stock. Kizer is already being projected 1st QB taken.
Aside from going for a NC and finishing school (if he hasn't) then there's not much incentive to stay.
I'm not sure there's been a solid mock put out since the weekend after that game.Is he still? Even in light of some uneven performances recently (discounting the Hurricane Matthew game completely)?
I'm not sure there's been a solid mock put out since the weekend after that game.
Two good, three average, and one bad. We're currently ranked 53rd this season, so it looks like we're on track for another average year. Would love to pin this on Booker's short-comings, but the trend doesn't really support it.
To me, Booker's issue is wild inconsistency. This year I am not surprised if we run back a KO or punt for a TD, or fumble it in the end zone; get a 70 yard punt, or shank it; kick a 50 yard FG, miss an extra point...
So while we may be average, I think the highs are higher and the lows lower than for most teams I can remember.
It's almost as if we are over-relying on a bunch of talented young guys b/c the coaching staff hasn't recruited consistently enough!
I'm not absolving Booker. But if he's the problem, how do we explain last year's performance?
I think it's less about explaining last year's performance, and more about explaining this year's.
The explanation is that a bunch of young, inexperienced players are trying to figure out what they're doing, and that inexperience tends to compound issues when the ball takes a weird bounce and things get screwy.
Also: guys might be pressing in response to how the season is going, like CJ doing too much on a failed fair-catch; coaching isn't hitting on the basic mental aspects of special teams play, like calling out a "PETER PETER PETER" loud enough for your blockers, learning when to make quick decisions like running up to prevent a bad bounce, and/or knowing the basic rules and responsibilities of live balls.
Is this on special teams coach Scott Booker and Kelly? Yes, because there’s a lack of attention to detail in these situations that has plagued the team all season and that is almost certainly a reflection of inadequate coaching. However, I think we should be fair here and point out that it’s likely no coach specifically told Sanders to attempt to field a bouncing ball inside the ten with a crowd of opponents around him. Nor did they tell Jalen Elliott or his kick return cohorts to ignore a live, bouncing ball if it happened to come their way. This will come up again in the next section, but it’s incorrect to attribute every bad thing that happens to coaches and every good thing that happens to players. Sometimes coaches make the right call and players screw up simple things. Sometimes coaches make the wrong call and players bail them out with sweet football moves. It's a constant dichotomy that needs to be assessed as we go.
Two good, three average, and one bad. We're currently ranked 53rd this season, so it looks like we're on track for another average year. Would love to pin this on Booker's short-comings, but these stats don't really support that explanation.
I'm not absolving Booker. But if he's the problem, how do we explain last year's performance?
CJ Sanders is electric, and Yoon was a pretty good kicker coming out of high school. Any success we had last year on special teams has more to do with their athleticism imo and less to do with Booker's teaching. Overall special teams wasn't that great last year imo. The bowl game was a great example. The Buckeyes killed us in field position. Our blocking wasn't great, and our coverage wasn't spectacular either. I think Newsome averaged more yards than their punter, but they were getting better returns and conversely stopping CJ before he could work some of his magic. There's a certain amount of luck when it comes to returns, I'll admit that, but overall our blocking could be better and our coverage is not consistently good. That's coaching.
Fremeau's STE disagrees. Out of 128 FBS programs, we ranked 19th last year. If you think his methodology is flawed, I'm open to reading your critique of it; but cherry-picked comparisons from the bowl game versus OSU certainly isn't going to give a more objective picture of our overall ST performance last year.
I'm not sure I would call 53rd average (technically yes). Our defense is ranked 54th and I think they've been pretty bad this year (I'll be nice and say mediocre). My problem with our special teams is that it's a place that we can exploit yet we obviously don't care enough. ND has some limitations compared to some of the football factories, which have been well discussed. Playing great special teams is something that doesn't take elite recruiting. It takes good coaching and a commitment to be great at it. I've never gotten the impression Kelly is interested in being great in that phase of the game.
So, to reiterate my point, it seems like any success we had last year in ST was some magic in CJ's returns, and Yoon's kicking. Overall we weren't consistently leading in any other categories...often middle of the pack or far worse in some cases. I'm not sure where they're getting this 19th ranking, but my guess is they're putting an emphasis on Yoon's FG completion numbers and some of CJ's big runs....maybe Newsome pinning teams deep. As a unit, I'm not seeing this great production you're referring to, especially when we're talking punt/kickoff coverage, and not even consistent return yardage.
This week's bowl projections have the most teams predicted to be eligible of any projection so far this season. I am now up to 75 teams with projected bowl eligibility, meaning I only needed to add five teams from the pool of those predicted to be 5-7. This week, those teams are Cincinnati, NC State, Northern Illinois, Texas and Utah State. Notre Dame is also projected to finish 5-7 and would be on that list, but I don't think the Irish will choose to accept a bowl bid at 5-7.
Did you even look at the ranking? All of it is explained there:
We were strong in Field Goal Efficiency (10th), Punt Return Efficiency (25th), Punting Efficiency (18th), and Defensive Starting Field Position (18th). We were average in Kickoff Efficiency (49th) and Net Starting Field Position (50th). And we were bad in Kickoff Return Efficiency (87th), and Offensive Starting Field Position (90th). Average those out, and our overall STE was 19th in the country.
Look at the top ranked programs from last year, and they were all weak in at least a couple categories. No one dominates across the board in STE.
Hire Frank Beamer to come in and share his knowledge with the staff.
