General team info

B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Oh I agree that the reasoning doesn't make sense. That's just what I recall the staff saying (I wish I could locate the exact quote). It had something to do with the guys capable of excelling on ST were needed in the actual offense and defense. Therefore, exhausting them on ST was probably a bad idea. I'm not saying I buy that excuse. But it's what I recall a person (maybe BK) saying.

All I know is that something needs to get fixed this season. I'm sick of ND being terrible at ST lately.

You remember correctly, that BK said that a problem with the punt return team was depth. But he wasn't talking about the returner. he was talking about the guys that block and destroy (and hopefully open holes) in front of the returner.

To complete the reference Kelly made a couple of cryptic remarks about walkons filling special teams roles ahead of freshman who could do nothing.
 
Last edited:

FightingIrishLover7

All troll, no substance
Messages
12,703
Reaction score
7,514
You remember correctly, that BK said that a problem with the punt return team was depth. But he wasn't talking about the returner. he was talking about the guys that block and destroy (and hopefully open holes) in front of the returner.

To complete the reference Kelly made a couple of cryptic remarks about walkons filling special teams roles ahead of freshman who could do nothing.

Kelly has also been on record saying that the punt return game isn't one of the things that "keep him up at night."... That kinda ticked me off. Came across as conceding defeat/disinterest with the returns... Our punt returns are embarrassingly bad. Something has to be done. If that requires starters on ST so be it.
 

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,964
Reaction score
6,453
If Coach doesn't want the Special Teams Coach to fairly regularly rush the punter, opposing teams will feel no urgency in getting the kick off, and there will be almost no returnable "bad" punts.

It is not the blocking. You cannot block the punt defense wave in the open field if the punts are kicked with "leisure" and relatively high. Punt returns occur when the punter makes a mistake and the punt gets there too soon. Then all you have had to do was delay the gunners.

Being a punt blocking threat is what makes punters nervous to get the kick off too quickly and, therefore, occasionally a low rocket. Beamer did not become a great punt-returning coach until he became a great kick-blocking coach. Kelly appears to want the ball so badly that risking kick interference is not thinkable [at least at this time].

We will not become a great punt return team, or even average, until we "release the hounds" occasionally on punt blocks.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
If Coach doesn't want the Special Teams Coach to fairly regularly rush the punter, opposing teams will feel no urgency in getting the kick off, and there will be almost no returnable "bad" punts.

It is not the blocking. You cannot block the punt defense wave in the open field if the punts are kicked with "leisure" and relatively high. Punt returns occur when the punter makes a mistake and the punt gets there too soon. Then all you have had to do was delay the gunners.

Being a punt blocking threat is what makes punters nervous to get the kick off too quickly and, therefore, occasionally a low rocket. Beamer did not become a great punt-returning coach until he became a great kick-blocking coach. Kelly appears to want the ball so badly that risking kick interference is not thinkable [at least at this time].

We will not become a great punt return team, or even average, until we "release the hounds" occasionally on punt blocks.

Exactly, perfect!
 

Patulski

www.ndnation.com
Messages
878
Reaction score
138
Here's the biggest problem we have in terms of personnel imo. We have as many safeties on the roster as we do wide receivers.


Receivers (9)
Daniels
Smith
Jones
Massa
Ferguson
Onwualu
Robinson
Fuller
Hunter

Safeties (9)
Farley
Collinsworth
Baratti
Turner
Badger
Hardy
Shumate
Prosise
Redfield
 

WakeUpEchoes

New member
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
101
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Spring Solutions: 2013 edition <a href="http://t.co/iNmP7WF5wT" title="http://wp.me/p14QUi-Jfw">wp.me/p14QUi-Jfw</a></p>— Keith Arnold (@KeithArnoldNBC) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithArnoldNBC/status/311303103930576897">March 12, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
Here's the biggest problem we have in terms of personnel imo. We have as many safeties on the roster as we do wide receivers.


Receivers (9)
Daniels
Smith
Jones
Massa
Ferguson
Onwualu
Robinson
Fuller
Hunter

Safeties (9)
Farley
Collinsworth
Baratti
Turner
Badger
Hardy
Shumate
Prosise
Redfield

I'd argue our system, with its flexed-out TEs and its slot/RB hybrid, doesn't require lots of bodies at WR. Only three WRs caught more than 7 passes last year; two of them are returning. Also, you forgot Neal and Brown. So, 11.

We are a little heavy at safety - especially since I believe all those guys have at least two seasons of eligibility remaining. But if that's our biggest personnel problem, well, I can imagine worse ones. Safeties work well on special teams and are relatively easy to convert to other positions. I worry a lot more about the shortage of proven RBs and backup o-linemen.
 

Patulski

www.ndnation.com
Messages
878
Reaction score
138
I'd argue that we don't have a system yet. I think Kelly used Eifert in any way he could because he was the only experienced, elite receiver he had. I don't see Koyack or Nichols in Eifert's league as a receiver. So, I don't think we'll be flexing TE's as much. I think Kelly wants to spread the field with speed, but hasn't had the personnel. Relying on jump balls to TE's is (hopefully) not going to be our biggest passing offense weapon in the future.

I think this will be a transition year and hope that with (a) another year under Golson's belt and (b) the development of our young receivers that we'll start to see a more explosive passing offense.

Sorry about leaving out Brown and Neal.



I'd argue our system, with its flexed-out TEs and its slot/RB hybrid, doesn't require lots of bodies at WR. Only three WRs caught more than 7 passes last year; two of them are returning. Also, you forgot Neal and Brown. So, 11.

We are a little heavy at safety - especially since I believe all those guys have at least two seasons of eligibility remaining. But if that's our biggest personnel problem, well, I can imagine worse ones. Safeties work well on special teams and are relatively easy to convert to other positions. I worry a lot more about the shortage of proven RBs and backup o-linemen.
 
Last edited:

UmphreakDomer

Well-known member
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
71
keith,

just reviewing your articles. i think you could do big things at Bleacher Report. LOL!

looking forward to your next look forward.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,509
Reaction score
17,369
Safeties work well on special teams and are relatively easy to convert to other positions. I worry a lot more about the shortage of proven RBs and backup o-linemen.

I agree with the point about safeties and backup O-linemen, but hopefully the recent additions for the O-line will help straighten that out. As far as RBs though, I think it's a position of strength. Yeah, we're not returning with a lot of carries in that group, but I think theres so much talent there now that theres little to worry about. Kelly has said that GAIII can be an every down back, he just happened to have 2 good guys in front of him last year. We've seen that Cam can carry the ball when the O-line is clicking. Amir is in the mix, although we haven't seen what he can do yet. Folston and Bryant have a lot of talent, I'm sure one of them will at least see Special Teams reps this year. Not all that worried about RB, and I'm kinda excited to see who that depth chart shakes out.
 

NDPhilly

Philly Torqued
Messages
16,441
Reaction score
16,721
“@gregauman: USF spring roster shows DE Aaron Lynch, transfer from Notre Dame who is eligible this fall, at 6-6, 244 pounds, down 18 from fall roster.”

Lost 30lb since leaving ND
 

Walter White

New member
Messages
733
Reaction score
61
“@gregauman: USF spring roster shows DE Aaron Lynch, transfer from Notre Dame who is eligible this fall, at 6-6, 244 pounds, down 18 from fall roster.”

Lost 30lb since leaving ND

That's really skinny. Unless he is going to try and play linebacker. He is going to need to be around 260 to seriously interest the NFL.

Best of luck to him though.
 

peoriairish

New member
Messages
4,145
Reaction score
350
I didn't want to make a whole new thread for this, but I found it s fun little fact.

Trent Dilfer just started following Devin on Twitter because his daughter just committed to play volleyball at ND. Another announcer now with ND connections.
 

Patulski

www.ndnation.com
Messages
878
Reaction score
138
Kelly on Troy Niklas: "He will not be played the way we played Tyler Eifert," Kelly said of Niklas' future role at tight end. "He'll be more of an in-line guy. We feel like he's got a lot of skills - he can run and he's athletic (and) he's long. We won't utilize him in the manner we used Tyler Eifert, but he's got a unique skill set."
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Kelly on Troy Niklas: "He will not be played the way we played Tyler Eifert," Kelly said of Niklas' future role at tight end. "He'll be more of an in-line guy. We feel like he's got a lot of skills - he can run and he's athletic (and) he's long. We won't utilize him in the manner we used Tyler Eifert, but he's got a unique skill set."

me not like.
thought he had good hands and speed?
 

dshans

They call me The Dribbler
Messages
9,624
Reaction score
1,181
... but.... Grateful Dead isn't violent enough for football.

Maybe not as violent as you'd like, but there's cowboys, wimmmens, drinkin', tokin', cardplay, gunplay, theft, horses and a cold-hearted murder ...

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-cCZFUj8IlM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Then there's:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2TBbj5_zA-8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

Green Mountains

Active member
Messages
240
Reaction score
204
me not like.
thought he had good hands and speed?

What Kelly said was part of the comparison between Niklas and Eifert (and I'm paraphrasing) ...."Think of Eifert as Hernandez and Niklas as Gronkowski."

He said Troy has a unique skill set, but it's different than Tyler's.

In that context....I think Mark Bavaro.
 

GoldenIsThyFame

Well-known member
Messages
10,899
Reaction score
789
Ticket prices for 2013

• $70 for Temple and BYU
• $80 for Michigan State and Navy
• $95 for Oklahoma and USC
 

IrishFaninTX

New member
Messages
1,038
Reaction score
46
Anyone know the price of the game at Cowboy Stadium? Planning on taking the family but d*mn, didn't plan on spending $400. Worried that game will be even more expensive. Might just be me and the wife going since the kids probably won't care that much, though my daughter might since we took her to the game in San Antonio in 09.
 
Top