ESPN ND News Thread

Circa

Conspire to keep It real
Messages
8,000
Reaction score
818
See also the "Bear" from GameDay (I forget his name) saying that Virginia is a good bet against Notre Dame to win outright. It's a good bet because it's paying 4 to 1, not because Virginia is more likely to win.

according to all conspiracy accounts we lost last year to get our young guns PT. So I'm actually in on this bet with the spread. GT is something not too far off.
 

IrishInFl

Back in Florida
Messages
5,288
Reaction score
424
according to all conspiracy accounts we lost last year to get our young guns PT. So I'm actually in on this bet with the spread. GT is something not too far off.

its_a_conspiracy.jpg
 

TDHeysus

FLOOR(RAND()*(N-D+1))+D;
Messages
3,315
Reaction score
355
Hannah Storm, alumna of the University of Notre Dame?

Yes....that doesn't give her a pass. I'd much rather watch a more professional female anchor; honestly ESPN has better female anchors (more professional) but the blue hairs at ESPN got a thang for HS.
 
Last edited:

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,382
Yes....that doesn't give her a pass. I'd much rather watch a more professional female anchor; honestly ESPN has better female anchors (more professional) but the blue hairs at ESPN got a thang for HS.

Certainly none by the name of Dana Jacobson.
 

NDTH91

Well-known member
Messages
1,092
Reaction score
204
I'm not usually one to bitch about espn coverage but the abc halftime report just showed me like 15 plays from lsu vs. auburn and literally one play from GT vs ND... not even from multiple angles...

It was just "Notre Dame vs. Georgia Tech - CJ Procise ran for a touchdown; Notre Dame wins"

I get that its just a halftime report and they only have so much time but damn...

EDIT: They just showed a few other games that only got one highlight. I'll accept that I'm a homer and I'm salty without much reason. Just wish the world would know how we owned GT today.
 
Last edited:

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
I'm not usually one to bitch about espn coverage but the abc halftime report just showed me like 15 plays from lsu vs. auburn and literally one play from GT vs ND... not even from multiple angles...

It was just "Notre Dame vs. Georgia Tech - CJ Procise ran for a touchdown; Notre Dame wins"

I get that its just a halftime report and they only have so much time but damn...

EDIT: They just showed a few other games that only got one highlight. I'll accept that I'm a homer and I'm salty without much reason. Just wish the world would know how we owned GT today.
Mark May had CJ Prosise as his prime time performer or whatever it's called.
 

Veritate Duce Progredi

A man gotta have a code
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
5,352
Mark May had CJ Prosise as his prime time performer or whatever it's called.

It appears Mark May is transforming his character now that Holtz is out. I like this Mark May better, unless I've just managed to catch him on his good days. He doesn't appear to always play the contrarian when it comes to ND.
 

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
6,932
Reaction score
2,253
Personally I like the sign that said:

"OSU's schedule is easier than the Ole Miss girls."
 

Circa

Conspire to keep It real
Messages
8,000
Reaction score
818
according to all conspiracy accounts we lost last year to get our young guns PT. So I'm actually in on this bet with the spread. GT is something not too far off.

gee wiz I was tipsy
 

KPENN

Well-known member
Staff member
Messages
13,017
Reaction score
11,343
It appears Mark May is transforming his character now that Holtz is out. I like this Mark May better, unless I've just managed to catch him on his good days. He doesn't appear to always play the contrarian when it comes to ND.

It was always kind of obvious what was going on there.
 

SoJerseyIrish

New member
Messages
505
Reaction score
38
It's in ESPN's best interest to promote and see the SEC and see them do well, they are in a "partnership" with the SEC or basically they own 80% of it. NBC broadcasts ND Games, that is their competition in the industry. I don't blame ESPN for promoting the SEC, that is just good business. I blame the NCAA for allowing these arrangements, I think it really puts a media giant like ESPN (Disney) in a position to promote one conference over another.........and we wonder where the SEC Bias comes from.....:)
 
Last edited:

phillyirish

................
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
884

theclassickiller

old and improved
Messages
500
Reaction score
104
College football's all-injury team

To me this seems like intentional disrespect from ESPN. I have a hard time believing many people would take Taysom Hill (granted he is a good athlete, but still unproven and very middle-of-the-road numbers) over Malik, or that many would take James Conner (also a good player, very overused, injury bound to happen) over Folston.

Leaving Jarron Jones off is just stupid. Call me a homer, these guys are major playmakers on a playoff caliber team, a lot of these other injured players would maybe be in our two-deep.


I know wizards will jump on me for this, but these sort of jabs happen way too often to believe these writers aren't biased.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,947
Reaction score
11,225
I have no problem at all with the Taysom Hill one, he was an upper class-men who proved it before and had injuries before... Malik while he looks the real deal really hasn't proven it yet due to his youth. Just Me.
 

theclassickiller

old and improved
Messages
500
Reaction score
104
I have no problem at all with the Taysom Hill one, he was an upper class-men who proved it before and had injuries before... Malik while he looks the real deal really hasn't proven it yet due to his youth. Just Me.

Taysom Hill to me has been a poor man's Denard Robinson. He can hurt you with his feet, but he is really sub-par passing. Tommy Rees might have been better when we met in 2013...

His numbers against power-5 competition are pretty dismal. I just can't see how, given the choice right now, anyone would opt for Taysom Hill over Malik Zaire if you had to win now. He fits one type of system, and he has to run 30 times a game to open up the passing game enough to put up average numbers.

We haven't lost a game yet with our starters out. I see the argument here.

I don't think that's the point of the article. Isn't the point to make the best team of the injured players, not who actually meant the most to their team?
 

tussin

Well-known member
Messages
4,153
Reaction score
1,982
College football's all-injury team

To me this seems like intentional disrespect from ESPN. I have a hard time believing many people would take Taysom Hill (granted he is a good athlete, but still unproven and very middle-of-the-road numbers) over Malik, or that many would take James Conner (also a good player, very overused, injury bound to happen) over Folston.

Connor was ACC player of the year and had over 1700 yards last year. Take off your homer glasses.
 

Blaise

Well-known member
Messages
2,233
Reaction score
88
Connor was ACC player of the year and had over 1700 yards last year. Take off your homer glasses.

Exactly this....

I get you like Folson, but c'mon.. How can you see that an ACC player of the year would make this list over Folson?
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
They went with injured veterans that have previously produced at a high level over injured rookies with better upside. Completely defensible; lots of our injured starters haven't proven much on the field yet.
 

gkIrish

Greek God
Messages
13,184
Reaction score
1,004
Jarron Jones is the only guy that should be on the list ahead of who is actually on it but I really don't know a lot about half those DLinemen so who knows.
 
Top