'22 AL RB Quinshon Judkins (Ole Miss Verbal)

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,128
Reaction score
11,077
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.
 

allenm5333

Well-known member
Messages
2,551
Reaction score
2,538
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.
No salary cap in CFB. So yes I would
 

arndtjc

Dee Snutzs
Messages
1,275
Reaction score
2,340
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.

Also I think it’s pretty clear that the RB room won’t be anywhere close to the reason next year’s team doesn’t win. That position is loaded for the next few years
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
With our group hell no... but maybe there are teams without a rb that need.. but he's not Him so it's a no thanks
 

T-Boone

Well-known member
Messages
8,401
Reaction score
4,798
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.
Nah I think I’d give the $1.3 to Keon Keeleys mother and get him signed on for $1.3 over the next 2 or 3 years.
 

Veritate Duce Progredi

A man gotta have a code
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
5,352
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.
It's a more fun experiment to imagine a top level WR, OT, S or DE.

If Tetairoa McMillan or Luther Burden were in the portal, 100% I would.

If Laiatu Latu (DE - UCLA) entered the portal, I think it'd be foolish to not put big money on him.

Also, as someone else said: No salary cap so if you have a chance to grab a monster difference maker for your team when you believe there are tons of pieces in place already, you have to roll those dice.
 

IAIrish

The Dude Abides
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
2,074
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.
Can Washington have him on loan for a game? $100k for the game.
If the feckin skunkbears can cheat their way to the title game, this should be totally in bounds.
 

Irish4life

Well-known member
Messages
2,887
Reaction score
3,674
That's right. That favorite in the national championship game who didn't throw a pass in a top 10 match-up for an entire half? Obviously it's because of the QB. The number one seed in the NFC with the best running back in the league? It's actually their clearly mediocre 7th round QB. Audric Estime? Bum.

PFF brain is killing football more than NIL, the portal, or anything.
Elite OLs make great run games, not RBs. Valueless position, completely interchangeable.
 

ColinKSU

Well-known member
Messages
4,647
Reaction score
6,163
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.
No
 

notredomer23

Staph Member
Messages
17,638
Reaction score
17,569
If you guys had the cash and the greenlight, and you thought it as a now-or-never year to make a run at a natty, would you drop $1.3M to put Judkins in the backfield for a year?

I don’t think I would… unless it was very clear that a stud RB was the missing piece for a sure-fire, natty-caliber offense. I liken it to the Rams dumping a bunch of first-round picks and (kind of) mortgaging their future on proven veterans in order to maximize their Super Bowl window.

I think there’s too much guesswork on a college roster to try that. But it’s a fun thought experiment.

The only non-QB I would have dropped $1.3MM on this cycle would have been the Edge from Purdue Nic Scourton. Imagine a 13 sack guy on this defense?!
 

Irish4life

Well-known member
Messages
2,887
Reaction score
3,674
Wouldn't go that far. An elite back can take an offense to the next level. Backs that are elite receivers or blockers open up an offense too.
Still a valueless position. The optimal way to handle a RB is to run them into the ground and let em walk before they get to a second contract (and in Judkins' case start asking for QB money). There is no value in keeping a RB around long term.
 

notredomer23

Staph Member
Messages
17,638
Reaction score
17,569
Loy (wearing his national analyst hat) posted on the OSU board that he was set to go to Bama than OSU upped the ante.

Sounds most likely outcome here is OSU, outside shot at FSU, long shot of returning to Ole Miss.

I'd be furious as an OSU fan to spend this type of money on a RB in the portal, assuming their acquisition money isn't unlimited.
 

NDMatt91

Well-known member
Messages
3,533
Reaction score
3,453
Loy (wearing his national analyst hat) posted on the OSU board that he was set to go to Bama than OSU upped the ante.

Sounds most likely outcome here is OSU, outside shot at FSU, long shot of returning to Ole Miss.

I'd be furious as an OSU fan to spend this type of money on a RB in the portal, assuming their acquisition money isn't unlimited.
Is Henderson returning?
 

Grahambo

Varsity Club Member
Messages
4,259
Reaction score
2,606
They didn’t want to spend on a QB instead going for a “winner”. But now spent likely 1.5+ on a RB?

I mean, ok. Have at it. When you lose your job over this don’t be surprised.
And a RB that supposedly is difficult.
 

maxwell

Active member
Messages
107
Reaction score
104
This gives OSU best 1-2 RB room in the country with Henderson . Judkins may be a “locker room problem”, but he is a tremendous back , love how hard he runs
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
They didn’t want to spend on a QB instead going for a “winner”. But now spent likely 1.5+ on a RB?

I mean, ok. Have at it. When you lose your job over this don’t be surprised.
Reminds me of Matt Millen drafting a WR in the first round 4 times. Having good RBs is great, but RB isn't what stopped OSU from beating Michigan.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,489
Reaction score
14,230
T

Yeah, that's gonna be a problem. We really better get our tackle situation figured out or our RBs are going to be in just for the added protection in that first game.
jag.png


Here's half.

Dude from Purdue who picked on a bunch of Big Ten midgets is the one with the situation. He got half his sacks in November against Minnesota, Michigan in a blowout and IU. Zero against Wisconsin and Iowa. Hmmm.

Hats off to him for cashing in.
 
Top