KeiV is a boss. And I know this has been a hot topic and some have given their explanation, but I'm seriously concerned with the amount of potential holding and def. PI calls this season. Those two loops above will almost certainly get called every time. And if the defense can't get off the field because of it, it'll drive me bananas.
Agreed. I'm worried about the 3rd downs, I expect to see many more flags. We must've been one of the least penalized teams the last few years and I took it for granted.
I'm not worried because its the third practice of camp in August.
This defensive backfield is filled with veterans, do you guys really think that they don't have a gauge on what PI looks like? They are just at the beginning of fall ball and getting in the groove of a new defense that demands physicality from all secondary positions. You dudes are nitpicking something that is simply some random plays on 2 minute clips of practice. Its really not that big of a deal, imo.
I'm just happy to see the DBs close enough to the WRs to be grabbing.
I do understand and agree with the 'practice like you play' regarding PI. But seeing them all over the WR is a welcomed change.
I agree that it is a small sample but at least 50% of pass plays that they show have some form of PI. Also the fact that we have veteran DBs makes it more concerning, they should know what the Hell PI is and stay away from it. Also I would be less worried if the DB tried to jump a route and picked the wrong one and then held but it seems that the DB's are holding all the way down the field which is more concerning. Hopefully they clean it up over fall camp but to say that mauling WRs most plays is nitpicking is somewhat strange.
I think in the one-on-one matchups we see on the clips, which are where the grabbing is the most prevalent, it's simply a matter of the drill being designed that way.
I doubt the coaches would let the defenders run through drills like that if they thought it would be a detriment come game time.
Schmidt is up about five pounds to 235, same as linebacking partner Jaylon Smith.
Whoa. I haven't had time to look over all the new heights and weights, but I'm surprised no one has brought this one up. The primary knock on Schmidt has always been his small size, no? If he's up to 235, and playing with the same intelligence, leadership and drive that got him on the field in the first place, he might not get passed as quickly as some of us were hoping.
I read that as 325 first...quite a bit different haha. 235 might still be a bit light, but I think that with the added weight Schmidt will be a good Mike for BVG's D. Especially since he already has the mental aspect down apparently.
Whoa. I haven't had time to look over all the new heights and weights, but I'm surprised no one has brought this one up. The primary knock on Schmidt has always been his small size, no? If he's up to 235, and playing with the same intelligence, leadership and drive that got him on the field in the first place, he might not get passed as quickly as some of us were hoping.
I read that as 325 first...quite a bit different haha. 235 might still be a bit light, but I think that with the added weight Schmidt will be a good Mike for BVG's D. Especially since he already has the mental aspect down apparently.
I'm not sure it is, at least not in a 4-3. In Diaco's 3-4, our MLBs were huge, but the ideal weight was still 245-255. I'd think 235-240 would be perfect for a 4-3.
I'm becoming less worried about our LB corps with each passing day.
I'm just worried about watching him get trucked by a bigger back. Certainly at 235 he will be better vs say, Stanford than at 230, but I'm still a little concerned. There's not a better option though, and I think that he will be fine. I'd just be more reassured if he had some more weight.
I'm not worried because its the third practice of camp in August.
This defensive backfield is filled with veterans, do you guys really think that they don't have a gauge on what PI looks like? They are just at the beginning of fall ball and getting in the groove of a new defense that demands physicality from all secondary positions. You dudes are nitpicking something that is simply some random plays on 2 minute clips of practice. Its really not that big of a deal, imo.
I don't think it's strange. They are transitioning into a more physical role and how do we not know the staff isn't asking them to do so? They didn't just become unaware of PI after all of the experience they have. This isn't their first rodeo.
Plus, we have literally seen less than 1% of the practices in these clips. The plays they put in them are plays that show some type of bigger play. Either a) a big catch in traffic (higher probability of PI) b) big pass breakup (higher probability of PI). They aren't showing a ton of plays where all of the receivers are covered and nothing really comes of the play.
I don't "get concerned" about really anything in these clips. Its too small of a sample and far too early to worry about. I certainly am not going to worry about players grabbing eachother in 11 on 11 in August.
How many times have I told you not to be bringing logic and common sense into this debate?
I guess that's why I don't get too worked up about camp. I'm excited that the season is rolling around, but we have no clue what instructions are being given. It can change from play to play.
Diaco virtually never put our DBs in press/ man coverage. As wooly suggested, Cooks may be having them focus on positioning and physicality at this point, with an eye toward cleaning up technique later in camp once the DBs are used to the more aggressive scheme.
While what you say might be true, it doesn't change the fact that A) They are in horrible position which is leading to many of the PI, B) Some of the PI is going on for 15-20 yards (Farley and Collinsworth both had plays where I thought they were trying to grope the WR) C) even KR had some plays where he was grabbing a fair amount.
I am not freaked out by it, as Wooly points out that there is time to fix it, but I would also point out that it is slightly concerning because this isn't ticky tack stuff, this is full on getting roasted and molesting the WR on many plays. I guess on the positive side maybe our WRs are just that good.
While what you say might be true, it doesn't change the fact that A) They are in horrible position which is leading to many of the PI, B) Some of the PI is going on for 15-20 yards (Farley and Collinsworth both had plays where I thought they were trying to grope the WR) C) even KR had some plays where he was grabbing a fair amount.
I am not freaked out by it, as Wooly points out that there is time to fix it, but I would also point out that it is slightly concerning because this isn't ticky tack stuff, this is full on getting roasted and molesting the WR on many plays. I guess on the positive side maybe our WRs are just that good.
Jhonny Williams is working in the background the whole time. Man he has some big legs, too!
Who is that working with Jhonney? Springman. If it is, Jhonney Williams is HUGE!