Most college men, athletes or not, come in as boys and go out [physically, mentally, confidence-wise] as men. There is no obvious reason to suspect that someone like Tommy Rees can't do the same in all three areas. He certainly has always had the right attitude about getting better by effort. That plus the coaching and the moral support of his buddies could do what needs to be done.
Tommy Rees will never be mistaken for RGIII, but I'll wait to see what "Tommy Rees, Senior Notre Dame Man" can become. I believe that it is at least reasonable to have some optimism here.
IF the right side of the OLine really firms up, then I think that Tommy will have some "rocking chair time", OFTEN, to set up and throw, reading his progressions accurately and not nervously staring down a missing Eifert. That line will also give the running threat that Tommy never can, so that only in 3rd and long will his inability to "Johnny Football it" make a difference.
With true protection, I am quite happy with his accuracy, even more than Everett's last season [thank God Everett could keep drives going with his athleticism, as he often stopped them with his inaccuracy]. Tommy might just, with upgraded OLine help, be the unspectacular "Pike-type QB" to surgically move the team downfield.
I'm not as nervous about Tommy as I am about Right Guard, and Safety "mental play". We're loaded with athleticism at safety, but not yet [to my viewing] with intelligent generalship. If I was Elliot [yeh, I know, thank God I'm not], I'd go with Matthias Farley and the fellow who has the defense down most smartly from the rest of the group. ... whoever that is among our pile of really good players there.
None of our problems seem hard to solve, at least in theory. If we get perhaps only three things smoothed out, this team is going to be better than last year's, maybe significantly so. If we flop on those areas, or get unlucky injuries, then we're not.