chicago51
Well-known member
- Messages
- 3,658
- Reaction score
- 387
FWIW Sampson wrote in the Athletic that he has heard that the WR coach is Rees's call and not MF's, so it might be more relevant to ask if Tommy has any connection to Wiggins.
The other possibility which we don't really know about it is how much exposure MF is going to give to his assistants. Saban's assistants never see the light of day, which might be frustrating for a young coach looking to get his name out. But I could see a young riser like Freeman resonating with other similar coaches by empowering them to grow as well.
Bad move if MF is pretty much giving Rees 100% power to make coaching hires . By all means he should collaborate with his offensive coordinator but any hire Rees makes needs to fit Marcus Freeman's vision, and Marcus needs to be involved.
You don't want one culture for the offense and one culture for the defense. I'd be inclined to give Tommy who he wants as I trust his judgment but I'm going to vet them if I'm coach Freeman.
Tommy may not be your OC forever. You don't want him taking the entire offensive staff with him when he walks out the door for head coaching because they're his guys.
Marcus needs to sit down and figure out his vision for the offensive side of the ball this off-season. You need have that because what you want to do affects who you recruit . When you have to replace an OC, you need to know what you want so you can hire the right replace.
Obviously if you brought in a flexbone OC, some your players you've been recruiting for years may not fit that scheme. That's a dramatic example but you get idea.
Last edited: