Booslum31
New member
- Messages
- 5,687
- Reaction score
- 187
If ND sent me 182 letters, I'd be ecstatic.
I only got one letter from them (Digger Phelps) and it said they weren't interested. Still...I loved getting mail from ND.
If ND sent me 182 letters, I'd be ecstatic.
I only got one letter from them (Digger Phelps) and it said they weren't interested. Still...I loved getting mail from ND.
Bowling Green
I don't know if I would call their other recruits studs. Half are kids from Ohio that OSU never offered. They are doing a better job than UK normally does but they aren't beating the top schools for these kids. Elam would be an exception, but he's from the state.
Not a bad tactic. Target kids from Ohio who normally go to other B1G schools instead of kids in the super-competitive SEC region. They won't get top-of-the-line kids that tOSU and scUM want, but it is going to pay dividends down the line because of less competition in the region. Another reason why the B1G will be the Big2 and the little-12 for the foreseeable future. The teams other than tOSU and scUM aren't getting targeted kids that normally go to B1G teams.I don't know if I would call their other recruits studs. Half are kids from Ohio that OSU never offered. They are doing a better job than UK normally does but they aren't beating the top schools for these kids. Elam would be an exception, but he's from the state.
Not a bad tactic. Target kids from Ohio who normally go to other B1G schools instead of kids in the super-competitive SEC region. They won't get top-of-the-line kids that tOSU and scUM want, but it is going to pay dividends down the line because of less competition in the region. Another reason why the B1G will be the Big2 and the little-12 for the foreseeable future. The teams other than tOSU and scUM aren't getting targeted kids that normally go to B1G teams.
Not a bad tactic. Target kids from Ohio who normally go to other B1G schools instead of kids in the super-competitive SEC region. They won't get top-of-the-line kids that tOSU and scUM want, but it is going to pay dividends down the line because of less competition in the region. Another reason why the B1G will be the Big2 and the little-12 for the foreseeable future. The teams other than tOSU and scUM aren't getting targeted kids that normally go to B1G teams.
There is a constant cycle of low- and mid-level BCS conference schools overachieving for short bursts. It is nearly impossible for them to maintain.
Looking at UK's schedule, they are looking at a minimum of 8 loses. But I think they could go as worse as 2-10. That kind of record won't keep guys like Elam, West, Barker, or Snodgrass
Looking at UK's schedule, they are looking at a minimum of 8 loses. But I think they could go as worse as 2-10. That kind of record won't keep guys like Elam, West, Barker, or Snodgrass
You can try to "change the culture" at Kentucky. Or you can play for championships at Notre Dame or Alabama. Some kids will choose the former. Others, the latter.
The fact that Elam's not committed to Kentucky by now suggests he might fall into the second camp.
My theory is he has not committed to UK yet because he wants to sit in front of a nationally televised audience and do the hat dance during the Army All-American Bowl. This kid LOVES attention. I could be wrong. He may fall into the 2nd camp as you suggest, but that's my theory.
My theory is he has not committed to UK yet because he wants to sit in front of a nationally televised audience and do the hat dance during the Army All-American Bowl. This kid LOVES attention. I could be wrong. He may fall into the 2nd camp as you suggest, but that's my theory.
The thing is the culture at UK is just not going to change. I don't see how kids can be sold on changing a culture that has been just an awful program for 50 years! They have sucked for a very, very long time. Its a basketball school in a basketball state. Louisville has had recent success, but I just do not see it happening at UK at all, especially with UK playing against SEC competition. UK has had one winning coach since Bear Bryant (who was Blanton Collier who immediately followed Bryant with an impressive 41-36 record.)
Since then it is not a pretty picture...
Charlie Bradshaw (1962-68) 25-41
John Ray (1969-72) 10-33
Frank Curci (1973-81) 47-51
Jerry Claiborne (1982-89) 41-46
Bill Curry (1990-96) 26-52
Hal Mumme (1997-2000) 20-26
Guy Morriss (2001-2002) 9-14
Rich Brooks (2003-2009) 39-47
Joker Phillips (2010-2012) 13-24
The thing is the culture at UK is just not going to change. I don't see how kids can be sold on changing a culture that has been just an awful program for 50 years! They have sucked for a very, very long time. Its a basketball school in a basketball state. Louisville has had recent success, but I just do not see it happening at UK at all, especially with UK playing against SEC competition.
The thing is the culture at UK is just not going to change. I don't see how kids can be sold on changing a culture that has been just an awful program for 50 years! They have sucked for a very, very long time. Its a basketball school in a basketball state. Louisville has had recent success, but I just do not see it happening at UK at all, especially with UK playing against SEC competition. UK has had one winning coach since Bear Bryant (who was Blanton Collier who immediately followed Bryant with an impressive 41-36 record.)
Right.
This is not Illinois or Arizona State or North Carolina, some sleeping giant program in a talent-rich state that just never quite pulls it together. This is a perennial bottom-dweller in a small, non-football state that plays in the toughest conference in the land. Stoops is probably better than the last few coaches they've had, but it'll take more than just a few guys who want to "change the culture" to make Kentucky competitive.