Putting aside the Nathan Starks quagmire(familiar territory for bogtrotter), Notre Dame has its class of 2014 running back. Atkinson, McDaniel, Carlisle, Mahone, Bryant, Folston, and now, Hood, make for quite a crowd for reps to be carrying a football. I doubt if there is interest, or the possibility of acquiring another quality backfield applicant. On with the motley, Nathan Starks recruitment is but a fond memory!
This bold-ed statement was so ambiguous that I cannot tell whether you are calling me a drug addict; calling my family drug addicts; calling me a know it all; generally being an a$$hat; or just misstating what you meant.
There is a lot of things I notice that I don't say. For example, the school said multiple offenses. Then we hear Molly. Then we hear stolen IPod.
Here is how something like that usually happens Person S has Molly. Person T has an IPod their parents gave them. Person T wants Molly really bad, so he trades his IPod for Molly. When person T's parents find out the IPod is gone the real problem starts. Since both persons S and T are probably, ahem, limited in their experience and rather short sighted, they probably don't realize that every Apple device is serialized to the bone, and that by this time the parents are ready to visit the wrath of god upon all involved as if they are his own right hand.
Here is where it gets tricky because laws vary state to state. If person S and T contract to do something that involves doing something illegal, or for something illegal, (atty's stop me) that is a criminal enterprise. Therefore the contract both entered into is not legal. Therefore person S is in possession of stolen property, having "stolen" it without even trying, or having specific knowledge or even intent to steal it.
This is what we would do to wake kids up. You and you felony theft and conspiracy to commit theft. You dealing dope. You purchasing and possession. Now you have felonies in addition to dope charges; do you want to kiss your life goodbye?
That is all I know.*
* The legitimacy was linking the IPod and the drugs (dealing) for me. This seemed to cement this rumor. It is almost impossible to catch kids dealing dope, unless you have possession of stolen good to lean on people with. Kids don't have a lot of cash, so what would a typically overprivileged kid do?
