Weird discussion in my opinion. We will cycle through all the ACC teams playing NO ONE every year... how's that simple fact not registering as a starting point for discussion? Ideal scheduling would get FSU one year; VT another; Clemson a third etc, rather than loading all the studs up in the same year, but sooner or later you have to beat them all down.
This in general is what Whiskey is trying to get across --- get a DECENT schedule [within our national recruiting parameters, and a very few old colleagues like Navy], and DO NOT load up every week, or even two weeks out of three, with top 20 teams. Beating down your own personnel so that they can not reasonably be at their best for the critical games on the schedule lacks perspective bordering on juvenile fantasy gaming. One might debate how many true powers is best, but that number is probably four at most, and those scattered if possible.
I find it ... well, actually surreal, to listen to people wanting to throw our guys out there in front of a murderer's row of meatgrinders while they sit back beer-in-hand to watch and b!tch about losing now and then.