dublinirish
Everestt Gholstonson
- Messages
- 27,314
- Reaction score
- 13,087
funny thing about schumate, he goes from being a few weeks ago mentally not able for the playbook to now being a stud and basically unbenchable.
funny thing about schumate, he goes from being a few weeks ago mentally not able for the playbook to now being a stud and basically unbenchable.
funny thing about schumate, he goes from being a few weeks ago mentally not able for the playbook to now being a stud and basically unbenchable.
funny thing about schumate, he goes from being a few weeks ago mentally not able for the playbook to now being a stud and basically unbenchable.
I am curious to see if he can stop Navy. That is the true definition of being successful at Notre Dame as the DC.
I am curious to see if he can stop Navy. That is the true definition of being successful at Notre Dame as the DC.
I am curious to see if he can stop Navy. That is the true definition of being successful at Notre Dame as the DC.
also physical grooming standards
I think TP was kidding. This D is built for speed and it should have no real trouble stopping Navy enough times to get the W.
And of course I wonder how much having Pat Eilers on the back end is helping. Kyle McCarthy is great, the kids love him and it was a big shock, especially being within the timeframe of the player suspensions, quite a one two.
So not only do you loose a guy that was described as a graduate student capable of handling the responsibilities of a position coach, but their has to be a hit to communication and teamwork on the back end, because of the reduced coaching contact.
So then Kelly, BVG, or the program gets a really high powered guy, great business success, started out his college at Harvard as a student only, and tried his hand at transferring into ND to try to make the football team. The guy played like three different positions for Lou; the original team player, so to speak. He has to be making a difference, and part of the reason Shumate and Redfield's games have taken off.
Would like more information on his impact, if anyone has it, whether my hypothesis is right or wrong.
Small point, but Pat transferred in from Yale, graduated in science then got a mechanical engineering degree a year later, all while playing football. Really good guy also. No specific info but Pat is one of those guys that has a lot to offer and any time spent around him is probably well spent time. Glad he volunteered to come back and try to give something to these young guys.
gif of the year, no need to hold a vote and wait. doesn't really capture the awesome crazy eyes like the HDTV live shot of this though. My 10 year old was scared of it and had to convince him that is exactly the feeling the opposing teams will have.
Kelly has replaced, what we thought were good coaches, with that appears to be, great coaches.
Warriner - Hiestand
Diaco - BVG
I hope this trend continues but most importantly, I wish we could lock this staff down for at least 3-4 years. It'd be so great to get the Irish machine churning at full speed before introducing change.
I will enjoy what we have, while we have it!
BVG certainly had Michigan's number Saturday night. Was it the transition from Borges to Nussmeier? Was it the transition from Diaco to BVG? Was it both? Either way, it was an incredibly impressive showing. Hopefully BVG continues to have great success, I don't want to hear any halftime excuses like "It's too late to make adjustments" like Diaco did against Navy. I think if our guys execute we should have an easier time stopping Navy in the 4-3 than we did in the 3-4. Past history has shown that "Bend, don't break" doesn't really work against Navy as they always do a fine job executing, they're not going to screw up often, so you must attack them. If our DE's contain it will keep the gains minimal, and hopefully Day and Jones can lock up the inside runs.
While I still prefer to have Heistand over Warriner, I still think we're struggling with our run blocking since Warriner left. While Michigan's DL is no slouch, and Mattison is generally a great coordinator, we certainly got stuffed sufficiently in our run game Saturday. Our OL guys have talent and experience, I'd like to see us opening holes for our talented RBs instead of them having to make cuts in the backfield or worse yet getting hit back there. Just focusing on our run blocking the last few years, I've seen some steps backwards from where we were prior to Heistand. On the other hand, pass blocking has been beautiful and Heistand has killed it in recruiting, which is why I still prefer him to Warriner.
We had Hiestand for 2012, yes? If I remember correctly, we ran the ball really well. In 2013, we had a QB who, by virtue of being in the game, limited the defense's responsibility by half. I bet we run big this year if Golson continues to show teams how lethal he is throwing the ball.
I thought our run blocking has been really good until Michigan, that might be the only exception that I can remember in the last two years (disregarding Bama since were dismantled). Do you have numbers to support this? And can we identify who was on the roster running the ball?
I am toying with the idea of making a screenshot of his wikipedia page my new avatar.