B
Bogtrotter07
Guest
Well, yeah, but that was a Democrat president saying that. When the Democrats win the White House, they are supposed to do what they were elected to do and for Republicans to stand in the way of that is obstructionist and wrong. When a Republican wins the White House, they aren't supposed to do what they were elected to do, they are supposed compromise and work with the Democrats to come to a solution that the Democrats like.
Everyone knows this.
The caveat here is that a Trump was elected. He was elected as a Republican, but he doesn't fit as a typical Republican. He is a business man and appears to be attacking things as a business man and bringing in other successful business men to help him implement his goals. Those Democrats that are trying to treat him like a typical Republican are having a hard time because he doesn't respond the way he should in their eyes. So then you have the others in the Democrat party that go total batsh!t crazy and keep trying to overturn the election even though its over. An example of this is Rosie O'Donnell who is calling for the initiation of martial law and for the current administration to keep power until the Russian influence in the election can be studied, determined that is the only reason DJT won, and the White House handed over to HRC who totally deserves it. Or, not so far over the cuckoo's a Cory Booker who testifies that Sessions is the biggest racist POS ever and giving him the AG post will take us back to a pre-Civil War South footing for rights in this country, but less than a year ago spoke about how great it was to work with Sessions in recognizing & praising civil rights activists. Apparently the reasoning is, he is trying to set himself up as the front-runner for the 2020 Democrat nomination for president.
DJT is not a true Republican and thus will not act as one, and while I believe him to be a total douche, I truly have no full idea how he will be as president.
See my post above. It starts to explain why you notice this seeming discrepancy.
Since Reagan, all Republican Presidential Candidates have run to take things away from people. I didn't say rights, because some people disagree about what it is that is being taken away.
But Republicans have run to take away. They have made it look like they were giving something. But not so much.
The key to their success is they convince everybody that the are taking away from the 'other guy,' which is great for Americans that act like they are Christian on the outside, but enjoy being barbarians deep down inside.
The majority maybe, but not all Americans, by the way. This cycle it was a relatively small but powerful group aided by the one vote equals more if you live in the right state provided for by the Electoral College. (Which I am against eliminating, by the way.)
And for the sake of clarity Republicans just take away rights by ripping them, Democrats do the same thing by stupidity : dumb programs, wandering around problems instead of dealing with them, etc. Both parties are equally bad. But when Republicans take over, you end up with a Depression, Recession, war, Prohibition, or some such stupid shit.
Last edited: