Valpodoc85
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,719
- Reaction score
- 466
Jordan Peterson for head coach!
Stars are like varsity jackets from High School...you have to put them away once you arrive at college and start over.
they don't play scrappy mid majors, they play the poors
So for those of you who don't care that Vandy has SIX 4 star players, and ND has ~45.
Why are we favored?
Is it because our coaching is so superior, specifically our Special Teams/OL/OC play calling?
I think it's the raw talent, but maybe I'm crazy.
Why do you care so much about trivial things? You set up arguments like this that basically favor your side.
Yes, we have more talent based on recruiting service "stars." That is never the full story and you know it. Unfortunately, when a high star team loses to a low star team, you automatically jump to your conclusion that the coaching and development sucks. Those might very well be true. However, it's a known fact that there are plenty of three star guys that just need to develop, weren't evaluated properly, or just work harder. Will Hernandez became the second best guard in the draft from UTEP (who sucks) and had pretty much 0 recruiting/evaluation.
In terms of a top-10 recruiting class within the last four years, 53 percent of teams that ended in the Top 10 of the final AP poll from 2011-17 featured at least one such haul (top ten composite class). In every year but 2011, at least five teams in the final Top 10 met that recruiting criteria – you’ll remember 2011 as the season Alabama and LSU played for the national championship from the same conference.
Teams with at least one top-10 class to their credit made up 63 percent of the teams ranked in the final top-5 from 2011-17.
Straw man alert!!
NFL draft has nothing to do with college football team performance. Better recruiting ='s better results.
From 247 after this years NCG....
Rankings matter.
I'm not denying rankings matter. My point is, Koon thinks they should be the end all be all.
ok......
Local radio sports is not claiming a win by Vandy this weekend but, they say their chances are very good. Mainly based solely on the QB play of both teams. They state Vandy has identical in talent and harder coached. Mason knows ND very well since he was DC at Stanford. Goal is to get as much pressure on BW as possible to force him into easy mistakes as shown in the Ball State game.
.
At QB or across the board? And are they familiar with our defense?
Their quarterback sounds solid and experienced but I just don’t see them scoring a ton of points on us. They’re right to go after Wimbush and try to force mistakes, but you have to think Kelly and Long will take the handcuffs off after last week and let him do what he does best. Or, if he can’t, ride with Book. For this game, that ought to be enough.
Vandy has the same talent as ND??? Even I wouldn't go there... lol

At QB or across the board? And are they familiar with our defense?
Their quarterback sounds solid and experienced but I just don’t see them scoring a ton of points on us. They’re right to go after Wimbush and try to force mistakes, but you have to think Kelly and Long will take the handcuffs off after last week and let him do what he does best. Or, if he can’t, ride with Book. For this game, that ought to be enough.
I almost think the opposite. I think he has the biggest issues when teams drop 8 in a zone and ask him to read the defense/throw with anticipation.
When teams gets aggressive I think that gives him the opportunity to be a playmaker.
well, in context to Vandy, do you deny that ND has a superior roster? On talent alone, ND should win this game 95 times out of 100. If you had equal rosters, pretty sure ND would not win 95 out of 100 because there is that much difference in coaching staffs. When Vegas sets the line, the factor in both. So in this case, it is based on talent IMO.
No I don't deny that. What I'm saying is games aren't won on talent alone. Talent can also fluctuate. It isn't set in stone when the recruits sign the LOIs. My argument to Koon is he fixated almost solely on stars and that's it. This has been his motive all the time in regards to playing "lesser opponents."
I want to win because of energy and game plan as well (IE, coaching).
I almost think the opposite. I think he has the biggest issues when teams drop 8 in a zone and ask him to read the defense/throw with anticipation.
When teams gets aggressive I think that gives him the opportunity to be a playmaker.
Stars matter. When a team has 45 and another has 6, that matters.
If a team has 30 and another has 40, it matters far less.
My point is were going to win this game on talent alone, but I dont want that to be the case Saturday. I want to win because of energy and game plan as well (IE, coaching). This shouldn't be 31-24 with our starters playing the entire game. This should be 38-20.
You have your nose so far up my butt again that you're ranting and raving about a point I never made.
Ps, sorry about the smell up there. Your wife made stew last night.
Ps, sorry about the smell up there. Your wife made stew last night.
I see someone is keeping it classy.
What's wrong with stew?
Nice of you to log into your other account to chime in.
I never start the fight, but I'll finish it.
Why is he allowed to post like this?
Why is he allowed to post like this?
This is hilarious coming from you. I literally never get into it with someone unless they start it (see above).
You are the opposite. You start the attacks (which are far worse than above).
There's nothing worse than the person who decides they're going to try to be a bully online and start something that doesn't need to happen.
You're a starter. I'm a finisher.