The hernia issue was still lingering with him
Coming from someone who's had a hernia: the thought of getting in and out of a three point stance at 300+ lbs all while running, sliding, and pushing makes me queasy. Mine was months ago and I still cringe when lifting weights or doing anything that requires agility. It definitely takes time to get confidence in your body back.
Pics or it doesn't happen.
What do you mean? Did you hear that somehow?
I mean what I said. I've heard from three separate people -- only one being an ND guy and I think he was half kidding -- that Stanford players are juiced out of their minds. The other two people I heard it from were a USC guy and a friend who went to Stanford... we were grabbing drinks in San Fran and it came up in conversation talking about our respective football programs, recruiting, and player development. It wasn't even an "I heard a rumor..." or "I think..." it was "there are a bunch of guys on some really good sh*t... that's how our 'player development' is so good."
But I mean this isn't unique. Happens basically everywhere in every sport to some degree. I've also heard Oregon is all about the juice and everyone knows USC had a bunch of juicers in the Cushing era. I have no idea who, if anyone, juices on ND's team because I'm not going to ask because I wouldn't want to hear the answer.
I mean what I said. I've heard from three separate people -- only one being an ND guy and I think he was half kidding -- that Stanford players are juiced out of their minds. The other two people I heard it from were a USC guy and a friend who went to Stanford... we were grabbing drinks in San Fran and it came up in conversation talking about our respective football programs, recruiting, and player development. It wasn't even an "I heard a rumor..." or "I think..." it was "there are a bunch of guys on some really good sh*t... that's how our 'player development' is so good."
But I mean this isn't unique. Happens basically everywhere in every sport to some degree. I've also heard Oregon is all about the juice and everyone knows USC had a bunch of juicers in the Cushing era. I have no idea who, if anyone, juices on ND's team because I'm not going to ask because I wouldn't want to hear the answer.
If I had to guess, Tommy, Heggie, and Farley.
But seriously, how the **** is this stuff not tested for repeatedly? I had no idea about this.
I mean what I said. I've heard from three separate people -- only one being an ND guy and I think he was half kidding -- that Stanford players are juiced out of their minds. The other two people I heard it from were a USC guy and a friend who went to Stanford... we were grabbing drinks in San Fran and it came up in conversation talking about our respective football programs, recruiting, and player development. It wasn't even an "I heard a rumor..." or "I think..." it was "there are a bunch of guys on some really good sh*t... that's how our 'player development' is so good."
But I mean this isn't unique. Happens basically everywhere in every sport to some degree. I've also heard Oregon is all about the juice and everyone knows USC had a bunch of juicers in the Cushing era. I have no idea who, if anyone, juices on ND's team because I'm not going to ask because I wouldn't want to hear the answer.
Why are we speculating about individuals on ND who are potentially juicing? Has there been a rumor or accusation? If not, I find it wildly inappropriate to call names.
I think everyone has been joking so far. If the NCAA doesn't test, I couldn't care less if they juice or not. Even playing field. I wouldn't think any less of the ND players for doing so. But I really wish the NCAA tested that stuff. It'd be best if NO one was doing it.
The other thing is how well blocked Holtz's Special Teams were. That 1988 Return by Watters started with Watters having a huge hole to get up to full running speed, and then he had only the kicker to beat. Kelly's Special teams do not block well and do not contain or tackle well. We have plenty enough speed/playmakers to have good Special Teams. What we do not have is good blocking and tackling.
I believe he's had lingering back issues too. Back issues for big guys=perpetual problem.
Yep. Happens all over and happens at ND too unfortunately.
The reason Holtz's team blocked, tackled and demonstrated great toughness and Coach Kelly's teams struggle at times IMO is Holtz ran a power offense, which meant the defense practiced everyday with a power offensive team ergo they had to play very tough and physical style, so you had a pretty tough physical team overall. This spread scheme we run IMO negates the size and physical advantage that we traditionally have been able to recruit and exploit. Spread teams usually are smaller faster teams, they usually don't have tough physical defenses to compliment them and they usually don't win Championships. The spread has had great success in some places and in some circumstances, I think the Notre Dame spread offense experiment is realizing some unforeseen??? growing pains. (Difficulty in short yardage and goaline offense, special teams toughness, and 2nd and 3rd level defensive tackling.)
ND's OL is built like a power team, but the spread emphasizes quickness. Either way, running the spread with a non-mobile QB is an exercise in futility.
ND's OL is built like a power team, but the spread emphasizes quickness. Either way, running the spread with a non-mobile QB is an exercise in futility.
I was responding to someone who was questioning the lack of toughness and tackling on special teams and in the secondary. Our o-line is built for power but we do not run a power scheme that is why we routinely struggle in goaline and short yardage situations and why we resort to empty shotgun sets. We do not commit to overpowering smaller inferior d-lines. IMO that has to do with the scheme and also the philosophy of the coaches within it.
It is infuriating when we have to throw a fade from the 1 against Navy. (or someone similarly out matched.) I'm not a coach, or even an expert, but why is this staff so afraid to just let them line up and fight? Spread or not, ND should be able to line up and stomp these weaker teams. Every other team does.
Over the last day... My observation is more centered on this fanbase... ( All over the internet and such, not just at IE) Seems there is a serious disconnect somewhere... It seems on one end you have a base that saw the growth last year and was ready to finally move forward after two decades of frustration... And they melted down... On the other it seems we have a segment that not only expected 8 wins, but is almost fine with it... And the two sides are just cutting each others throats.
The reason Holtz's team blocked, tackled and demonstrated great toughness and Coach Kelly's teams struggle at times IMO is Holtz ran a power offense, which meant the defense practiced everyday with a power offensive team ergo they had to play very tough and physical style, so you had a pretty tough physical team overall. This spread scheme we run IMO negates the size and physical advantage that we traditionally have been able to recruit and exploit. Spread teams usually are smaller faster teams, they usually don't have tough physical defenses to compliment them and they usually don't win Championships. The spread has had great success in some places and in some circumstances, I think the Notre Dame spread offense experiment is realizing some unforeseen??? growing pains. (Difficulty in short yardage and goaline offense, special teams toughness, and 2nd and 3rd level defensive tackling.)
This spread scheme we run IMO negates the size and physical advantage that we traditionally have been able to recruit and exploit.
Spread teams usually are smaller faster teams,