Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
So do Dems try to defend Gov. Norton or does his reign as governor get aborted over these pictures?

https://www.dailypress.com/news/vir...tham-evms-blackface-photo-20190201-story.html

First the abortion blow up and now this. Not a good week at all for him.
Calling all spin-doctors

There will be less outrage by the left for this than for a smiling white Catholic kid doing nothing.

750x422
 
Last edited:

MJ12666

New member
Messages
794
Reaction score
60
50/50 he survives. In a Washington Post article they quote the Va. Senate Minority leader as follows:

A Northam ally, Senate Minority Leader Richard L. Saslaw (D-Fairfax) defended the governor.His whole life has been about exactly the opposite and that’s what you need to examine, not something that occurred 30 years ago,” said Senate Minority Leader Richard L. Saslaw (D-Fairfax). “While it’s in very poor taste, I would think there is problem no one in the General Assembly who would like their college conduct examined. I would hate to have to go back and examine my two years in the Army. trust me. I was 18 years old and I was a handful, OK? His life since then has been anything but. It’s been a life of helping people, and many times for free.”

Of course I doubt this individual was saying the same thing about Bret Kavanaugh, but I am sure the Dems arguments against Kavanaugh will quickly be forgotten. LOL - I may actually have to watch some CNN tonight to see if they cover this and what they have to say.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,708
Reaction score
6,016
First the abortion blow up and now this. Not a good week at all for him.
Calling all spin-doctors

There will be less outrage by the left for this than for a smiling white Catholic kid doing nothing.

750x422

I dont like the idea of digging into yearbooks. Seems like a low blow. But I can't think of someone more deserving right now than him.
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
You guys are confusing porn with the real problem. Some three year old playing Candy Crush 10 hours a day is a pretty damn mind rotting thing. People throw devices at their kids like pacifiers and it has very negative long term consequences. Parents don't care, they just want their kid to shut up, leave them alone and be cool.
Of course I agree with this. I'm not defending this stuff, I'm just putting the blame on parents rather than the government.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
I dont like the idea of digging into yearbooks. Seems like a low blow. But I can't think of someone more deserving right now than him.

I wish they would have brought this up when they pulled out Kav's yearbook.
KKK>Farting

Karma is a bitch aint it.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Of course I agree with this. I'm not defending this stuff, I'm just putting the blame on parents rather than the government.

It absolutely starts with parents. And I'm just not sure what the gov logically can do anyway. I'd love to see schools ban smart phones.

If you want your kids to shut up, don't hand them tech. That's what closets are for
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
50/50 he survives. In a Washington Post article they quote the Va. Senate Minority leader as follows:



Of course I doubt this individual was saying the same thing about Bret Kavanaugh, but I am sure the Dems arguments against Kavanaugh will quickly be forgotten. LOL - I may actually have to watch some CNN tonight to see if they cover this and what they have to say.

lol... i just flipped on CNN 10 minutes ago, and it just broke.
they are all questioning why we haven't heard a peep from Ralphy-boy
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Have CNN on for a while now while cooking. Hardly any talk on Northam. Wall to wall coverage about Roger Stone lol.

Life comes at you fast.

Hope he has Nationwide

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ralph Northam is apologizing for the black face photo. <br> <br>via CNN's <a href="https://twitter.com/ryanobles?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ryanobles</a> <a href="https://t.co/3ZTz5v2Bgw">pic.twitter.com/3ZTz5v2Bgw</a></p>— andrew kaczynski (@KFILE) <a href="https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1091475320505618434?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 1, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited:

Wild Bill

Well-known member
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
3,267
That is the most pansy-ass shit I've ever heard.

"Try taking an iPhone away from a seventh grader," says Tucker, implying that it's impossible. Nut up and be a goddamn parent! Do you, Whiskeyjack, need help from Congress to prevent your kids from owning a smartphone? Of course not.

-Tucker attacks silicon valley, some of the deepest pockets in the world who have purchased influence on every inch of the planet, for knowingly peddling shit to consumers and their children = "pansy ass"

-Blames parents, most of whom believe their children are best served by understanding "tech" and are completely ignorant of the issues it may cause = woke lolbertarian hot take.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Tucker on fire tonight.

While covering the Northam shit show, says of the fallout.
"Northam will be kept comfortable, and resuscitated if his party so chooses"
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
-Tucker attacks silicon valley, some of the deepest pockets in the world who have purchased influence on every inch of the planet, for knowingly peddling shit to consumers and their children = "pansy ass"

-Blames parents, most of whom believe their children are best served by understanding "tech" and are completely ignorant of the issues it may cause = woke lolbertarian hot take.
I agree with his attacks on silicon valley and his criticism of parents. The pansy ass part is his insinuation that parents are powerless without federal regulation to back them up.

Tucker isn't pansy ass, impotent parents are pansy ass.
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
"Someone did not do their due diligence." How an attempt to review Texas' voter rolls turned into a debacle
Texas officials flagged 95,000 voters for citizenship reviews. But after thousands have already been cleared, questions are being raised about how they handled the process.

BY ALEXA URA FEB. 1, 2019, 10 AM

State Rep. Rafael Anchia had been alarmed by the actions of the Texas secretary of state’s office for days by the time the agency’s chief, David Whitley, walked into the Dallas Democrat’s Capitol office on Monday.

The Friday before, Whitley’s staff had issued a bombshell press release calling into question the citizenship of 95,000 registered voters in Texas. Soon after, Democratic lawmakers and advocacy groups were raising serious questions about how many people on that list were actually non-citizens who are ineligible to vote.

But before those doubts emerged, Whitley, the top election officer in the state, had handed over information about those registered voters to the Texas attorney general, which has the jurisdiction to prosecute them for felony crimes.

So as Anchia sat at the end of his green, glass-topped conference table, he wanted to know: Did Whitley know for sure that any of the names on his list had committed crimes by voting as noncitizens?

“No,” Whitley answered, according to Anchia.

“And I said, ‘Well, isn’t it the protocol that you investigate and, if you find facts, you turn it over to the AG?”

“I do not have an answer for that,” Whitley responded, according to Anchia’s recollection of the Monday meeting.

By then, Whitley’s press release had already been signal-boosted by top Republican officials — including President Donald Trump — who slapped on unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud and illegal voter registration and pointed to it as proof that voter rolls needed to be purged. And county election officials across the state had gone to work parsing through the records of thousands of registered voters whose citizenship status the state now said they should consider verifying. Some counties were even in the process of sending letters to voters ordering them to prove they were citizens.

Soon after, the citizenship review effort would buckle, revealing itself as a ham-handed exercise that threatened to jeopardize the votes of thousands of legitimate voters across the state. The secretary of state’s office would eventually walk back its initial findings after embarrassing errors in the data revealed that tens of thousands of the voters the state flagged were actually citizens. At least one lawsuit would be filed to halt the review, and others were likely in the pipeline. And a week into the review, no evidence of large-scale voter fraud would emerge.

But at their Monday meeting, Whitley argued that his office was following the normal course of upkeep of the voter rolls. That didn’t make Anchia — who chairs the Texas House’s Mexican American Legislative Caucus — feel much better.

“What they have set in motion is going to disenfranchise U.S. citizens and it’s going to infringe on their right to vote,” he said days later. “The damage that this is doing … to legitimate U.S. voters is substantial.”

“Lawful presence list”
The citizenship check effort went public this week, but the seeds for it were planted in 2013. That year, Texas lawmakers quietly passed a law granting the secretary of state’s office access to personal information maintained by the Department of Public Safety.

During legislative hearings at the time, Keith Ingram, director of elections for the secretary of state’s office, told lawmakers that the information would help his office verify the voter rolls. The state had had a recent misstep when it tried to remove dead people from the rolls and ended up sending “potential deceased” notices to Texans who were still alive.

One of the DPS records the secretary of state's office was granted access to under the 2013 law was a list of people who had turned in documentation — such as a green card or a work visa — that indicated they weren’t citizens when they obtained a driver’s license or a state ID card.

But it appears that the secretary of state’s office held off for years before comparing that list with its list of registered voters. Former Secretary of State Carlos Cascos, a self-proclaimed skeptic of Republican claims of rampant voter fraud, said he had no memory of even considering using the DPS data when he served from 2015 to 2017.

“I don’t recall it ever coming to my desk,” Cascos said. “I don’t even recall having any informal discussions of that.”

And there was reason to be careful with the “lawful presence list.” Driver’s licenses don’t have to be renewed for several years. In between renewals, Texans aren’t required to notify DPS about a change in citizenship status. That means many of the people on the list could have become citizens and registered to vote without DPS knowing.

Other states learned the hard way that basing similar checks on driver’s license data was risky.

In 2012, Florida officials drew up a list of about 180,000 possible noncitizens. It was later culled to about 2,600 names, but even then that data was found to include errors. Ultimately, only about 85 voters were nixed from the rolls.

Around the same time, officials in Colorado started with a list of 11,805 individuals on the voter rolls who they said were noncitizens when they got their driver’s licenses. In the end, state officials said they had found about 141 noncitizens on the rolls — 35 of whom had a voting history — but that those still needed to be verified by local election officials.

But it was under the helm of former Secretary of State Rolando Pablos, who took over in 2017, that Texas began processing the DPS list. That happened even though at least some people in the office knew the risk. Officials in the secretary of state’s office early last year told The Texas Tribune that similar checks in other states using driver’s license data had run into issues with naturalized citizens. Pablos didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Still, on Dec. 5, Betsy Schonhoff, voter registration manager for the secretary of state’s office, told local officials that her office had been working with DPS “this past year” to “evaluate information regarding individuals identified by DPS to not be citizens.” In a mass email sent to Texas counties — and obtained by the Tribune — Schonhoff informed them that the secretary of state’s office would be obtaining additional information from DPS in monthly files and sending out lists of matches starting in mid-January.

The next day, Pablos announced he would resign after two years in office. In his place, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott appointed Whitley, a longtime Abbott aide who at the time served as the governor’s deputy chief of staff.

“VOTER FRAUD ALERT”
Last Friday, Williamson County Elections Administrator Chris Davis had just wrapped up a staff retreat when he got back to his office in Georgetown. By then, news of the state’s list of 95,000 registered voters flagged for review was spreading.

A secretary of state’s advisory about the list had landed in his inbox earlier that day, but it didn’t include any numbers. He knew the reported total of 95,000 likely included naturalized citizens from the get-go.

But misinformation spread quickly. Some of the statements being released about the list were misleading. Others were downright inaccurate. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, took to Twitter within the hour and prefaced the news with the words “VOTER FRAUD ALERT.” At that point, none of the counties had any data to verify.

Thanks to Attorney General Paxton and the Secretary of State for uncovering and investigating this illegal vote registration. I support prosecution where appropriate. The State will work on legislation to safeguard against these illegal practices. #txlege #tcot

VOTER FRAUD ALERT: The @TXsecofstate discovered approx 95,000 individuals identified by DPS as non-U.S. citizens have a matching voter registration record in TX, approx 58,000 of whom have voted in TX elections. Any illegal vote deprives Americans of their voice.

Also on Twitter, Abbott thanked Paxton and Whitley “for uncovering and investigating this illegal vote registration.” Later that afternoon, the Republican Party of Texas sent out a fundraising email with the subject line that read “BREAKING: 95,000 Non-Citizens Registered to Vote?!”

The next day, the president chimed in, claiming on Twitter that “58,000 non-citizens voted in Texas” and adding the unsupported claim that “voter fraud is rampant” across the country.

58,000 non-citizens voted in Texas, with 95,000 non-citizens registered to vote. These numbers are just the tip of the iceberg. All over the country, especially in California, voter fraud is rampant. Must be stopped. Strong voter ID! @foxandfriends

But when El Paso County’s election administrator, Lisa Wise, examined the list of 4,152 names she got from the state on Monday morning, she knew something was wrong. Included on the list was one of her staff members — a naturalized citizen since 2017.

“We had a naturalization party for her,” Wise said. “She had gone and gotten her driver’s license, I think, four years ago.”

The errors didn’t end there. By Tuesday morning, secretary of state officials had started calling counties across the state to inform them that they had made a mistake. The office had incorrectly included some voters who had submitted their voting registration applications at DPS offices and who since then had been confirmed to be citizens, county officials said.

Things grew even more confusing for Remi Garza, elections administrator in Cameron County. He had originally received a list with just more than 1,600 people to review. When someone from the secretary of state’s office called on Tuesday, Garza was told that weeding out applications labeled as “source code 64” — the code that indicates the origin of the application was a DPS office — would remove “well over” 1,500 names from his list, leaving him with just 30 individuals to investigate.

But his staff was only able to find 300 people whose applications were labeled as such, Garza said. After another call with the secretary of state’s office, Garza said he was told that the 1,500 number had also been incorrect. Now, he said he’s left with about 85 percent of his list.

“That’s a level of accuracy I’m not comfortable with,” Garza said on Tuesday. “We’re going to be moving through it very cautiously and slowly. We're talking about the franchise and, I’m not in any way going to jeopardize someone’s ability to vote unless I have a very serious concern.”

Following the secretary of state’s calls, the number of registered voters flagged by the state began to plummet. In Harris County alone, the state’s flub translated to about 18,000 voters — about 60 percent of the original list — whose citizenship status shouldn’t have been questioned.

In Travis County, officials dropped 634 voters off their original list of 4,558. Dallas County’s original list of 9,938 dropped by more than 1,700 voters. In Tarrant County, it was about 1,100 voters cleared from the original 5,800.

The secretary of state’s office told the McLennan County elections office to disregard its entire list of 366 voters, the Waco-Tribune Herald reported.

But the state’s calls came a day too late in Galveston County, where Cheryl Johnson, who oversees the voter rolls as the county’s tax assessor-collector, had already sent off the first batch of “proof of citizenship” letters to voters who were on her initial list of more than 830 people.

On Monday, her office had mailed 92 notices, which told voters their registration would be canceled if they didn’t prove their citizenship within 30 days. That warning even applied to citizens who missed the notice in the mail or didn’t gather their documentation in time. On Tuesday, she learned from the state that 62 of those never should have been sent out. She spent Wednesday preparing follow-up letters to inform those voters that their registration was safe.

“I don’t even have words”
For the better part of 26 years, Julieta Garibay, a Mexican immigrant, was regularly reminded that she better not vote: “‘It’s fraud. You would never be allowed to become a citizen.’ This was ingrained in my mind.”

When she finally took her oath of citizenship in a federal building in San Antonio last April, she let only two days go by before registering to vote in Austin, her adopted hometown. She excitedly cast a ballot last November.

But she’s been stewing since last Friday when she heard about the secretary of state’s announcement. Garibay last renewed her driver’s license in 2017 — before she became a U.S. citizen — so she was sure she was on the list. A Travis County official called her to confirm her suspicions on Wednesday, after Garibay had reached out.

Travis County election officials suspected people like Garibay would be on their list. And state officials confirmed to them on Tuesday that the records they provided may include voters who were not citizens when they applied for a driver’s license but have since become naturalized citizens, said Bruce Elfant, the county’s tax-assessor-collector and voter registrar.

But the secretary of state’s office has not confirmed that publicly, and it has not responded to questions about whether it will send updates to the attorney general’s office to clear individuals who were on the original list.

Amid the silence, civil rights groups and members of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus have raised questions about whether the secretary of state’s office publicized its numbers knowing naturalized citizens would be included — or worse that they published them because naturalized citizens could be purged from the rolls in the process.

For Cascos, a Republican who said he long struggled to toe the party line when it came supporting claims that voter fraud was “rampant,” it’s been problematic to watch how the secretary of state’s initial announcement seemed to confirm the beliefs of many Republicans.

“I think there’s a problem here, and the problem is that, in my opinion, someone did not do their due diligence before they let these numbers out,” Cascos said.

On Thursday, Abbott — whose initial reaction to the numbers went as far as vowing a legislative fix — attempted to recast the secretary of state’s announcement as a work in progress.

"They were reaching out to counties saying, ‘Listen, this isn’t a hard-and-fast list," Abbott said at an unrelated press conference. "This is a list that we need to work on together to make sure that those who do not have the legal authority to vote are not going to be able to vote."

But while some election officials are looking for ways to clear naturalized citizens without asking them to verify their citizenship, others are unlikely to follow suit. For instance, Johnson in Galveston County says she has no other way to determine whether the people on her list are citizens other than sending them a notice that starts the 30-day clock for them to provide proof to avoid getting kicked off the rolls.

“They said, ‘Use other resources,’ and I said, ‘What resources are that?’” Johnson said. “They said, ‘Well, see if you have any other ways to determine the information.’ I really don’t.”

Secretary of state officials, in conversations with county officials, have gone so far as to express interest in how locals were identifying naturalized citizens on the list.

On Tuesday, the civil rights group League of United Latin American Citizens filed a lawsuit that argued that forcing naturalized citizens to prove they are legitimate voters amounts to a “witch hunt” and a “plan carefully calibrated to intimidate legitimate registered voters from continuing to participate in the election process."

To Democratic state Rep. Victoria Neave of Dallas — who is on the Mexican American Legislative Caucus committee created to scrutinize the citizenship review — the whole effort is “nothing short of a political attack on Latino naturalized citizens.”

But Garibay, the Mexican immigrant, sums it up as irresponsible and frustrating.

“I think to many of us, especially when the journey has been so long … [voting] is something so important,” Garibay said. “For someone to say you did something wrong when it’s your right to do it, I don’t even have words.”

The Election Fraud database from Heritage Foundation, which tracks Voter Fraud and notes that it was recently updated, Texas has fourteen instances of "Ineligible Voters" from 2011-18. Two were citizens from other countries and were sentenced to 10-20 years in prison. Partisan media like Fox has no interest in reporting either these statistics nor the update and responses from the Texas Secretary of State nor the County election officials. The unadulterated acolytes politically push the agenda unabashedly that they are losers because of massive ineligible voting. We'll see what the results end up being, which Fox News will not cover.
 
Last edited:

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
"Someone did not do their due diligence." How an attempt to review Texas' voter rolls turned into a debacle
Texas officials flagged 95,000 voters for citizenship reviews. But after thousands have already been cleared, questions are being raised about how they handled the process.

BY ALEXA URA FEB. 1, 2019, 10 AM



The Election Fraud database from Heritage Foundation, which tracks Voter Fraud and notes that it was recently updated, Texas has fourteen instances of "Ineligible Voters" from 2011-18. Two were citizens from other countries and were sentenced to 10-20 years in prison. Partisan media like Fox has no interest in reporting either these statistics nor the update and responses from the Texas Secretary of State nor the County election officials.

Partisan outrage pieces like this from the Texas Tribune (the aurhor churns them out, you provided a few from her, which this is another regurgitation of the prior) ignore that dems have persisted to:

1) keep the registration process void of any true citizenship validation (which is the foundation of this whole issues)
2) make any status difficult to validate
3) not require to update citizenship status
4) make it difficult to get full information from precincts
5) and do absolutely everything they can to make investigating these issues almost impossible

And the author fails to mention that these are flags for investigation. Not final sentences....

The article does not try to explain why individuals who were naturalized over the period in question (some of what the Left calls "errors"), registered in the first place (it was illegal). The left will focus on the errors made, and be outraged. They will use that outrage to distract from anything found to be validly illegal.

If you flagged 100 pedophiles and found that 50 of them were not actually pedophiles, would you be so outraged that you let the 50 true pedophiles walk?
 

Wild Bill

Well-known member
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
3,267
I agree with his attacks on silicon valley and his criticism of parents. The pansy ass part is his insinuation that parents are powerless without federal regulation to back them up.

Tucker isn't pansy ass, impotent parents are pansy ass.

Sure, there are some terrible parents who are weak and will capitulate to their own children. There are also very good parents or well intended parents who aren't as intelligent as a guy like you or Whiskey. The number of parents who have never considered the negative impact of tech is probably larger that we'd like to believe, others are probably incapable of fully comprehending the long term impact, and countless parents are stretched thin working 50 plus hours a week to maintain their household and simply can't shield their children from all the evils of the world.

I'm not encouraging you to embrace the federal government as a way to fix poor parenting or stupidity. Instead, just consider your perspective - what is your interest? I have a greater interest in protecting people, even those who are not as intelligent or engaged, than I do protecting a free market that allows Silicon Valley to impose whatever agenda they prefer on our society. Once the damage is done and they've destroyed the minds of a portion of our youth, it'll be your children and mine who will suffer the consequences, not Silicon Valley Execs.

Consider the Rx industry and in particular the damage done by the Sackler family. Were we better off allowing them to operate within a so called free market, and pretending that any issues they may create would only be felt on an individual level and could be redressed by a civil court? That's a fantasy that nobody of your intellect could possibly believe. A civil suit does nothing to undo the absolute hell they knowingly unleashed on our society, and I'd be shocked if they were even forced to pay damages to victims of their filth on an individual level.

I'm not over here begging for the federal government to take the lead. I understand it's completely corrupt and would only work to help the deepest pockets. I'm merely suggesting that we, as individual citizens, should embrace the idea that we have an obligation to help and protect the people within our communities. It doesn't matter if you're rich or poor, bright or dim witted, everyone should pitch in to protect one another. If a majority of citizens embraced the idea of sacrificing for each other from the highest levels to the lowest levels, perhaps we'd have a federal government that could be used as a weapon against those who disregard our collective well being.

I used to be a committed libertarian and I'll admit it can help individuals. Followers of the ideology are typically very self determined, disciplined, their ability to use reason and logic results in making good decision. Where the ideology falls short is that it cannot impose a social order that compels others to do the same. As a result, you and I will never live in a society that even remotely resembles a libertarian utopia.

A guy once told me that the libertarian/anarchocapitalist ideology is nothing more than a rubik's cube for 120 plus IQ white guys in their 20s and 30s. It's so true. Ironically, if libertarians all decided to put down their rubik's cubes down and instead collectively worked with one another, they'd probably succeed (for reasons stated above) in shaping our culture/society into one that more closely resembles their world view.
 
Last edited:

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,546
Reaction score
29,009
Ralph Northam has now pivoted from apologizing to "I don't think it was me in the photo" (which we'll unpack in a second) to denying he was in the photo... while admitting that he has dressed up in blackface before.

First of all, if he wasn't actually in the photo he would've IMMEDIATELY come out and said so. Like... you know whether or not you've ever dressed up as a Klansman or in blackface. Period. And if you didn't, you'd vehemently deny it. Second, it's beyond the pale to think it wasn't him and then just happened to end up on his yearbook page... and then he didn't do or say anything about? What an absolute liar and fraud.

He has GOT to go. Sad to admit I voted for him.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Okay you got me. My bad for dressing as a Klansman or in black face<br>...<br>I’m not sure which one I was lol<br>...<br>Matter of fact you know what that wasn’t even me<br>...<br>Ok but one time I DID do black face but it was to moonwalk and honor Michael Jackson<br><br>Bro.. just stop talking &#55358;&#56614;&#55356;&#57339;*♂️</p>— Secular Talk (@KyleKulinski) <a href="https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1091799303352397825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,708
Reaction score
6,016
Ralph Northam has now pivoted from apologizing to "I don't think it was me in the photo" (which we'll unpack in a second) to denying he was in the photo... while admitting that he has dressed up in blackface before.

First of all, if he wasn't actually in the photo he would've IMMEDIATELY come out and said so. Like... you know whether or not you've ever dressed up as a Klansman or in blackface. Period. And if you didn't, you'd vehemently deny it. Second, it's beyond the pale to think it wasn't him and then just happened to end up on his yearbook page... and then he didn't do or say anything about? What an absolute liar and fraud.

He has GOT to go. Sad to admit I voted for him.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Okay you got me. My bad for dressing as a Klansman or in black face<br>...<br>I’m not sure which one I was lol<br>...<br>Matter of fact you know what that wasn’t even me<br>...<br>Ok but one time I DID do black face but it was to moonwalk and honor Michael Jackson<br><br>Bro.. just stop talking ����*♂️</p>— Secular Talk (@KyleKulinski) <a href="https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1091799303352397825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Lmaooooo man...this dude don't know how to take the L. If he had owned it, I'd have said that it was fine and he could now get back to being a babykilling governor. But now his behavior, coupled with how he went after that Gillespie guy for being a racist, man....tough to see how he stays in office.
 

tko

I am Legend
Messages
8,516
Reaction score
1,710
He wasn't sure why the guys in med school called him coon man.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,708
Reaction score
6,016
He wasn't sure why the guys in med school called him coon man.

No that was undergrad. He's got his cadet uniform on. Three years before the yearbook!

And many years before talking about leaving a kid on a table while he talks to mom about letting the kid die.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
at some point, blind sheeples will realize repubs were the ones that abolished slavery and fought to give women the vote. the dems were the ones wearing hoods and fighting to keep african americans out of white schools.

walls aren't immoral or racist. but wearing a hood, or going black face is. and killing a born infant is just F'ing highest level evil.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,708
Reaction score
6,016
Anyone else think that maybe the Dems dropped this on him so they could replace him with a dude with a similar ideology and without the baggage of this dude's abortion comments?
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,596
Reaction score
2,013
Ralph Northam has now pivoted from apologizing to "I don't think it was me in the photo" (which we'll unpack in a second) to denying he was in the photo... while admitting that he has dressed up in blackface before.

First of all, if he wasn't actually in the photo he would've IMMEDIATELY come out and said so. Like... you know whether or not you've ever dressed up as a Klansman or in blackface. Period. And if you didn't, you'd vehemently deny it. Second, it's beyond the pale to think it wasn't him and then just happened to end up on his yearbook page... and then he didn't do or say anything about? What an absolute liar and fraud.

He has GOT to go. Sad to admit I voted for him.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Okay you got me. My bad for dressing as a Klansman or in black face<br>...<br>I’m not sure which one I was lol<br>...<br>Matter of fact you know what that wasn’t even me<br>...<br>Ok but one time I DID do black face but it was to moonwalk and honor Michael Jackson<br><br>Bro.. just stop talking ����*♂️</p>— Secular Talk (@KyleKulinski) <a href="https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1091799303352397825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Our national "outrage against racism" meter seems a little low on this one...
 

IrishSteelhead

All Flair, No Substance
Messages
11,114
Reaction score
4,686
Politics

Anyone else think that maybe the Dems dropped this on him so they could replace him with a dude with a similar ideology and without the baggage of this dude's abortion comments?



This. 100% coordinated attack from own side. Trim some unhealthy fat without giving an inch on the issue of abortion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Partisan outrage pieces like this from the Texas Tribune (the aurhor churns them out, you provided a few from her, which this is another regurgitation of the prior) ignore that dems have persisted to:

1) keep the registration process void of any true citizenship validation (which is the foundation of this whole issues)
2) make any status difficult to validate
3) not require to update citizenship status
4) make it difficult to get full information from precincts
5) and do absolutely everything they can to make investigating these issues almost impossible

And the author fails to mention that these are flags for investigation. Not final sentences....

The article does not try to explain why individuals who were naturalized over the period in question (some of what the Left calls "errors"), registered in the first place (it was illegal). The left will focus on the errors made, and be outraged. They will use that outrage to distract from anything found to be validly illegal.

If you flagged 100 pedophiles and found that 50 of them were not actually pedophiles, would you be so outraged that you let the 50 true pedophiles walk?

Anymore for your information, I just look at our political threads once a day. While I am limiting my responses to three a day and will be reducing these, I don't mind clarifying a few points.

- A quick review of Texas voting laws shows anyone that voting registration procedures with proof of identification with photo IDs and of residency which have been established by a trifecta state dominated by Republicans (easily Googled) A couple of photo IDs for voting include a Handgun License or a Military License.

- voter id cards which have been found to be non-discriminatory in the courts in 2018 and are part of the process of voting

- County Clerks are in charge of keeping their voting rolls up to date, culling voters and following Texas voting laws. Multiple County Clerks are speaking out against having a hundreds or thousands of voters in their counties dumped on them by the state (Google it).

- The Texas Secretary of State has notified County Clerks that errors have been made for many included on the list. Harris County (Houston) voters list from the SoSt has already dropped from 30,000+ to 12,000 because they were mistakenly flagged by the SoSt.

- Texas like other states has instituted a Real ID for drivers licenses with multiple forms of identification and proof of residency. Approximately 25% of voters nation-wide do not have drivers licenses or state ID and must present other documentation, which is acceptable in Texas.

- Other states - some of which are mentioned in the article - have also instituted checks on voters who may have been ineligible to vote and come up with very few. Colorado's check of over 11,000 possible was found thirty-five non-citizens who actually voted. Florida started out checking over 180,000 and ended up with only 85. Lawsuits concerning results in Arizona and New Mexico in close races were examined by both sides for illegal voting and resulted in no evidence of any voter fraud.

Very simply, as I said, we'll wait and see, but it is apparent that as one county official said that the state did not do due diligence, that the SoSt acknowledges mistakes were made, that counties who have sent out letters to verify are withdrawing those, and that in a state which has quite detailed requirements of voting registration, these initial numbers of thousands may well be insignificant like in so many other states.

One additional point in my mind is the Texas SoSt could made confirmations more broad or more specific, and not just check the box for Hispanic voters.

(My political posts are done for today.)
 
Last edited:

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Texas Dems ask noncitizens to register to vote, send applications with citizenship box pre-checked
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/18/texas-democrats-ask-noncitizens-register-vote/

https://texasscorecard.com/local/non-citizens-voting-texas-elections-officials-tell-lawmakers/
While the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) requires local election officials to maintain accurate voter rolls, it also made it easier for non-citizens to get on the rolls by mandating that states offer voter registration by mail and at driver’s license offices. Registering to vote is now an honor system, with no documentation required and no one verifying citizenship – applicants merely check a box affirming they’re U.S. citizens.

Anymore for your information, I just look at our political threads once a day. While I am limiting my responses to three a day and will be reducing these, I don't mind clarifying a few points.

- A quick review of Texas voting laws shows anyone that voting registration procedures with proof of identification with photo IDs and of residency which have been established by a trifecta state dominated by Republicans (easily Googled) A couple of photo IDs for voting include a Handgun License or a Military License.

- voter id cards which have been found to be non-discriminatory in the courts in 2018 and are part of the process of voting

- County Clerks are in charge of keeping their voting rolls up to date, culling voters and following Texas voting laws. Multiple County Clerks are speaking out against having a hundreds or thousands of voters in their counties dumped on them by the state (Google it).

- The Texas Secretary of State has notified County Clerks that errors have been made for many included on the list. Harris County (Houston) voters list from the SoSt has already dropped from 30,000+ to 12,000 because they were mistakenly flagged by the SoSt.

- Texas like other states has instituted a Real ID for drivers licenses with multiple forms of identification and proof of residency. Approximately 25% of voters nation-wide do not have drivers licenses or state ID and must present other documentation, which is acceptable in Texas.

- Other states - some of which are mentioned in the article - have also instituted checks on voters who may have been ineligible to vote and come up with very few. Colorado's check of over 11,000 possible was found thirty-five non-citizens who actually voted. Florida started out checking over 180,000 and ended up with only 85. Lawsuits concerning results in Arizona and New Mexico in close races were examined by both sides for illegal voting and resulted in no evidence of any voter fraud.

Very simply, as I said, we'll wait and see, but it is apparent that as one county official said that the state did not do due diligence, that the SoSt acknowledges mistakes were made, that counties who have sent out letters to verify are withdrawing those, and that in a state which has quite detailed requirements of voting registration, these initial numbers of thousands may well be insignificant like in so many other states.

One additional point in my mind is the Texas SoSt could made confirmations more broad or more specific, and not just check the box for Hispanic voters.

(My political posts are done for today.)
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
2,732
I couldn't care less about Northam's yearbook photo or the outrage/lack thereof surrounding it. The infanticide thing makes me sick to my stomach and there is absolutely no issue or stance that can come close - he advocates for murder of innocent children. How is that not far and away the story over a dumb yearbook photo?

What irritates me with the photo - HTF isn't that found in the governors race opposition research? Holy shit the guy's nick name was Coonman? How do you not go for the jugular in a race baiting world with that layup of a freaking gem to play? Instead, Coonman effectively paints the other guy a racist with zero evidence - sociopath level trolling there. Republicans suck.

Trump tweeted a sweet one on how whoever handled Gillespie's oppo research was grossly incompetent. This is what pisses people off - can't trust Republicans to fight at the same level as Dems.

As for the Libertarian thing - why does it have to be a 100% discipleship to the most extreme form of ideology? What else comes close to a smaller government, socially liberal, fiscally conservative platform? Or a basic move to bring power back to the states and get the feds back in their own lane?
 
Top