Political Correctness thread

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
Czerwiec went so far as to leave an angry voicemail with the university ROTC office in the minutes following her call to 911 and subsequent phone call with a UND police officer.

"There is no reason in this day and age that you need to do these exercises in the middle of the quad," she said in part of the voicemail recording. "Do them somewhere else. I shouldn't have to work in a terrorized environment."

She said she regrets using profanity in the heat of the moment.

"But I do stand by the things I said in that message, which was that they had scared me unnecessarily and I didn't think it was a good idea for them to be doing the drills on campus while classes were going on," she said. "That I thought that was creating unnecessary stress and fear."

It is amazing to me how people expect society to dumb sh!t down for them, because they can't handle/process/keep up with what is going on around them. Instead of dragging everyone else down to their level of (in)ability, maybe they should work on themselves a little? No one has ever achieved anything great by forcing everyone else to move as slow as they do.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031
Does she not realize that those students in ROTC will also be the ones defending her rights in the future?
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
When does assigning the "political correctness" term switch when the minority becomes the majority?

Say I lived in Texas. Could I say,

"I know it's not 'politically correct' to question open carry guns on campus, but..." ??? or

'I know it's not 'politically correct' to doubt that creationism is a real science or that it shouldn't be taught in schools, but..."???
 
Last edited:
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
When does assigning the "political correctness" term switch when the minority becomes the majority?

Say I lived in Texas. Could I say,

"I know it's not 'politically correct' to question open carry guns on campus, but..." ??? or

'I know it's not 'politically correct' to doubt that creationism is a real science or that it shouldn't be taught in schools, but..."???

There are other factors that trump the minority status of a PC term. Like stupidity. So don't even fret the 'creationism is a real science' one.

Actually, don't fret any of them if you live in Texas!
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest

Let's 'you and me' go out for a drink and discuss this. The logic bomb, wrapped in a rhetoric impossibility. (Something is gaining power so it becomes easier to defeat?)

Kind of reminds me of the insane things we say every day to keep living the complacent lives we do.

We could also discuss why when a pompous, arrogant, shitard speaks with a haughty, aristocratic British accent, their verbal diarrhea sounds even worse!
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,991
Let's 'you and me' go out for a drink and discuss this. The logic bomb, wrapped in a rhetoric impossibility. (Something is gaining power so it becomes easier to defeat?)

Kind of reminds me of the insane things we say every day to keep living the complacent lives we do.

We could also discuss why when a pompous, arrogant, shitard speaks with a haughty, aristocratic British accent, their verbal diarrhea sounds even worse!

His point holds a lot of truth with regard to how human nature works with regard to social issues. Take, for example, prohibitionists who were an early incarnation of fascist-progressives. If they had not succeeded in banning all alcohol and had instead meekly restricted it or banned certain kinds of alcohol or taxed it then their Amendment wouldn't have been repealed shortly thereafter. They galvanized people against their "we know better" laws and attitudes.

The same thing is happening now... if these were "reasonable" attempts at censorship by academia, etc. then they wouldn't be making waves. But they're clearly going for a full power grab Fahrenheit 451 style and if they lose the counter-swing against their PC cultural is going to be massive (see: Donald Trump).
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
When does assigning the "political correctness" term switch when the minority becomes the majority?

Say I lived in Texas. Could I say,

"I know it's not 'politically correct' to question open carry guns on campus, but..." ??? or

'I know it's not 'politically correct' to doubt that creationism is a real science or that it shouldn't be taught in schools, but..."???

Sure...

I think the point is, you should be able to voice said opinions w/o fear of retribution from government. I think the spirit of the legal relief is largely extended across most interactions at all levels in and out of government, however there is nothing that says people can't respond in kind in an open discussion.

But I think there are some dangerous over-reaches by those holding the minority opinion...

1) public assembly...you can't go blow up someone else's right to assemble when you disagree. And there is nothing protecting a right to be a selfish douchebag, and their is no protection when your actions for all intents and purposes seek to achieve censorship. Those people deserve to be treated harshly on the spot, and rebuked long term by everyone.

2) academic institutions are a special case...Those in administrative and lecturing roles should be far more mindful that their institutions should be places where the right to speak your mind is stretched to the maximum...lest you simply sign up for indoctrination of varying degrees. Historically, they have set that expectation. When university leadership engages in what can only be construed as censorship, or creating an environment welcoming of censorship, that is a special case of heinous....and while legally it isn't likely to be a violation, people should be especially outraged, particularly at state funded institutions. I think it ridiculous that Universities find themselves largely protecting their student bodies from what has been an essential part of their mission...and I'd argue one of the very few benefits to having mandatory liberal artsy components to a curriculum (ie even engineers are usually forced to have some liberal arts shit in their degree).

...and unrelated to the post I'm responding to...I find Milo an insufferable jackass like Trump...but Dennis Miller said something about Trump that applies here too...Trump is a head shaker...but there are days I find myself shaking my head up and down. Same can be said for Milo.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
His point holds a lot of truth with regard to how human nature works with regard to social issues. Take, for example, prohibitionists who were an early incarnation of fascist-progressives. If they had not succeeded in banning all alcohol and had instead meekly restricted it or banned certain kinds of alcohol or taxed it then their Amendment wouldn't have been repealed shortly thereafter. They galvanized people against their "we know better" laws and attitudes.

The same thing is happening now... if these were "reasonable" attempts at censorship by academia, etc. then they wouldn't be making waves. But they're clearly going for a full power grab Fahrenheit 451 style and if they lose the counter-swing against their PC cultural is going to be massive (see: Donald Trump).

We have similar points, but a different perspective, I think.

I find the term 'fascist-progressives' an oxymoron. The reason it is impossible is because true progressives, whether they liberal minded, or conservative, are first and foremost populists. By nature, true human progress means more rights and responsibilities for more people. Not the few, elitism; not the like minded, authoritarianism; nor those defined by any racial, gender, or religious distinction, supremacism.

No, fascism is a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a single source of authority (human) that controls the lives of the people where no individuals or groups are not allowed to disagree with the government.

The truth is : A) Progressivism precludes a single source of authority, as well as use of rule for a common good; and B) The fact that brainless airbags like Trump and Yiannopoulos can speak out, with impunity, is proof that there is no fascist presence involved.

As far as our own country's history, the fascism meter has been steadily been falling since the 1960's. I was there to experience it, and I am here now as a witness.

Warning : blue text below represents a charming yet long winded experience of an event from the author's childhood.

When I was a rather young child I loved reading. I had my library card by my fourth birthday. It took me that long because I could never execute a written address or signature good enough for the librarian.

At any rate, by nine I was reading fairly advanced works related to literature, history, psychology, and politics. Even with my parents permission, the library would deny me checking out, or even viewing certain works. The most vehement denials were along political lines. God forbid I wanted to read anything from Nietzsche, Rohde, Wagner, Schopenhauer, Kant, Lange, or, (God forbid!) Darwin and Marx!

It wasn't just me, and that I was a kid. While I was their defending myself with a blistering counter-attack to the feeble minded will of "the man," [who happened to be a rather unattractive woman, of the high-brow, spinster variety, (I know, you can't see me rebelling, pitching a bitch, or attacking with vicious intent when I feel I am being wronged. That is so unlike me!)] a man, far more adult, and far larger than me watched with great interest. When I was done getting talked down to and yet again denied, and it was his turn to be helped, he asked for one of the very volumes I was interested in.

He was denied. We both learned something interesting that day; just because a library had a book, it didn't mean anyone would actually get to see that book. As to why, I actually remember looking up the word "seditious" to try to understand why I couldn't read certain material I wanted.

At any rate, that incident is so well etched in my memory because it prompted my first letter to my congressman, Thomas Ludlow Ashley. (We actually met years later, and he remembered the letter.) I cannot to this day decide who got a bigger 'kick' out of it!


Back to business. The comparison of those intent on prohibition wanted to take away an actual tangible resource in (our) one's pursuit of happiness. It was a greater good argument, which makes it upon first blush look like the PC crowd's actions. But that is where it ends.

(Remember, a 'greater good argument, and doing something for the 'common good' are two entirely different things! Greater good is an argument for elitism of some kind, it divides people into groups, even if it is only those who are saved or receive benefit, versus those who don't; Common good is a proposition where benefits are shared by everyone, ie., when a soldier sacrifices his life so that we may continue to experience freedom, or when Jesus Christ died on the cross to save us.)

Well maybe the two crowds share a character weakness or two, but that is where the similarity ends. The fact of the matter is, if you insist on calling me a bogtrotter, or are not allowed to call me bogtrotter, you have not lost anything, in either case, or from one extreme to the other. Nothing as far as your right to free speech, or anything else related to your pursuit of any of your inalienable rights. By using 'traditional' language, you have just shown your self as a little less couth.

In fact, the voices of a Donald Trump, the Tea Party, The Religious Right, Moral Majority, Obstructionist Congress, ad nauseum, which some are trumpeting as the champion(s) of individual rights, is or are, anything but that! No, they are making a play based upon showing an affinity for individual rights, but they are really engaged in the struggle to contain progressive reform for all those, namely the 'have-nots' that are benefiting from today's increased enlightenment.

Are all these anecdotal examples of asshat behavior moronic? Yes! But that never stopped humans, individually or socially prior to our times!

My feeling is that unless someone is a direct threat to me, or my family, I can let the rest roll off my back. I mean, I think that I, and society as a whole are better off for not calling others, "ni___r, k__e, w_p, d__o, she__y, b__ner, fa__ot, or R__sh Li_____h!

And like I said in an earlier post with the "Souix" example, these hatreds are deeply ingrained in us. So much so that I think it is worth taking a look at some of our rearranged prejudices that we like to call original thinking.

Or maybe it will keep us from electing a clown as President that states publically he is willing to consider using nukes to attack an underground, secretive terrorist group, that survives in large part by blending in to the general population!
 
Last edited:

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,382

Didn't see this story until yesterday. I laughed hysterically when I read "emergency counseling." Hahahahaha

Damn it....this is the group that's going to be running the country when we're old...scary thought. Sure hope there's no Cold War nuclear crisis or worse in the future...these punks will be hiding under their desks sucking their thumbs. Part of me wants to vote for Trump just to see these overly-offended wastes of space crumble and watch all the celebs move away. The other half of me just shakes my head when I see the lineup of all the possible candidates this year. Lot of crappy politicians these days.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,991
We have similar points, but a different perspective, I think.

I find the term 'fascist-progressives' an oxymoron. The reason it is impossible is because true progressives, whether they liberal minded, or conservative, are first and foremost populists. By nature, true human progress means more rights and responsibilities for more people. Not the few, elitism; not the like minded, authoritarianism; nor those defined by any racial, gender, or religious distinction, supremacism.

No, fascism is a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a single source of authority (human) that controls the lives of the people where no individuals or groups are not allowed to disagree with the government.

The truth is : A) Progressivism precludes a single source of authority, as well as use of rule for a common good; and B) The fact that brainless airbags like Trump and Yiannopoulos can speak out, with impunity, is proof that there is no fascist presence involved.

Not going to quote the whole post, but I think this worth addressing. I bolded two very correct statements. First, traditionally, classic "progressives" are populists who have been focused on empowering people to have a say.

Second, you are also completely correct about fascism. When I say "fascist-progressive" I mean people who self-style themselves "progressives" but are actually fascists. This undercurrent is unavoidable populism, because there will always be a group of people who take it too far and instead of "empowering" people they end up attempting to silence anyone who disagrees with their viewpoint.

Fascism is traditionally defined as being at the furthest end of right-wing political spectrum. But what people consider "left" and "right" gets jumbled these days, because many Republicans (what the media calls the "right") want limited government and are more libertarians than anything else. Many people who call themselves liberals are the furthest thing from classic liberals, and so on and so forth.

So what you get is something like this: Viral video of student confrontation over dreadlocks prompts investigation at SFSU | KRON4.com

You have a "progressive" person literally telling someone how they can or cannot dress. Much like you have "progressive" people trying to limit what people can say, and other forms of expression. These people aren't ACTUALLY progressive... but that's how they self-identify.

And this is the problem with political correctness... that black woman finds it politically correct to assault a white man over his hair. If a white man assaulted a black woman over how she was wearing her hair, it would be considered a hate crime.

Same as with how Hamilton is lauded for using a black/Latino cast to play white historical figures but when Hollywood casts Gerard Butler as a fictional god in Gods of Egypt it's considered "white washing" and the director has to apologize. It's all the same, fascist problem and it all comes back to political correctness.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,991
Also, embed for everyone because this video is standalone worthy:
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jDlQ4H0Kdg8?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Best part is that there are dreads in virtually every culture, including Euro-centric ones.
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
Also, embed for everyone because this video is standalone worthy:
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jDlQ4H0Kdg8?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Best part is that there are dreads in virtually every culture, including Euro-centric ones.

no-brainer here...SHE was clearly the aggressor. I think she could have probably kept her job had she just let go when he tried to pull away (no that she should...but its Frisco)

...but the nail in her coffin...she wouldn't let go, and the veiled threat..."don't put your hands on me". Just exactly what do you all think was going to happen to that kid in the days to come if there wasn't someone there filming? Everyone who watches this can pretty much conclude she was going after this kid, and was going to flip the assault on him...

That kid literally owes his friend his life, because he was about to be ruined by this psycho from hell...I still think he probably can't stay at that school because the faculty will blame him, so I hope he sues the pants off that place, and goes to Stanford...

and as for her "companion" boy...he clearly conspired and participated in this...he needs to be expelled.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Not going to quote the whole post, but I think this worth addressing. I bolded two very correct statements. First, traditionally, classic "progressives" are populists who have been focused on empowering people to have a say.

Second, you are also completely correct about fascism. When I say "fascist-progressive" I mean people who self-style themselves "progressives" but are actually fascists. This undercurrent is unavoidable populism, because there will always be a group of people who take it too far and instead of "empowering" people they end up attempting to silence anyone who disagrees with their viewpoint.

Fascism is traditionally defined as being at the furthest end of right-wing political spectrum. But what people consider "left" and "right" gets jumbled these days, because many Republicans (what the media calls the "right") want limited government and are more libertarians than anything else. Many people who call themselves liberals are the furthest thing from classic liberals, and so on and so forth.

So what you get is something like this: Viral video of student confrontation over dreadlocks prompts investigation at SFSU | KRON4.com

You have a "progressive" person literally telling someone how they can or cannot dress. Much like you have "progressive" people trying to limit what people can say, and other forms of expression. These people aren't ACTUALLY progressive... but that's how they self-identify.

And this is the problem with political correctness... that black woman finds it politically correct to assault a white man over his hair. If a white man assaulted a black woman over how she was wearing her hair, it would be considered a hate crime.

Same as with how Hamilton is lauded for using a black/Latino cast to play white historical figures but when Hollywood casts Gerard Butler as a fictional god in Gods of Egypt it's considered "white washing" and the director has to apologize. It's all the same, fascist problem and it all comes back to political correctness.

Now we are getting closer!

Before I go on, I really appreciate your posts, whether they are aligned with what I believe or not. They usually show great thoughtfulness, and quite a high intellectual capacity. Oh yeah, and probably most important passion and commitment.

I certainly do not disagree with what you say in your last two paragraphs. I quite agree with it. So much so that I will take it one step further.

The mechanism you describe is and has been at the core of human social behavior since before human history was recorded. It is like a pendulum; first it swings one way, naturally, only to swing back against its previous path, and so on.

As humans grow, and society changes, often with formerly powerless people gaining equivalent rights to the majority, there is a counter movement. This can be seen factually in something as basic as human language, or in results compiled by the human genome project. It is literally a part of our languaging, and our DNA!

The most interesting aspect of this is that change has never happened as fast as it has in the United States (in particular), in the last 120 years. In something like six generations, give or take, we have dealt with problems caused by the institution of slavery, and its eradication, the birth of a middle class, labor representation, the enfranchisement of women and minorities, etc.

Forget about technology? Sometimes I would like to do just that. Think it has slowed down any? Watch a movie from five years ago!

So with that the pendulum swings faster, with a wider arc. Do I like any of the excesses either way? No. But thank providence I am not in charge of that!
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
Just to be clear, the video says she is a campus employee, but SFSU is quoted in Lax's article that she does not actually work for the school.

Noted, thanks for the clarification.

So in that case the response really needs to be expulsion of both her and her pink pants compatriot. Just cannot accept "warrior" crap perpetrated on students (even if by other students). The moment she grabbed him was the moment she stopped being a fellow student seeking to be heard, and she became an agent of censorship...and that kind of attitude needs to be rooted out, and killed off (not her...her attitude).
 

Blaise

Well-known member
Messages
2,233
Reaction score
88
I just don't understand how people allow themselves to get so worked up... People do or say stupid things that you don't agree with.. Why act all crazy
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433

first...who'd actually go to Marquette if they could go to ND...had to throw that punch :)?

Marquette Can't market itself as a catholic institution in good faith, and allow the censorship of what amounts to a Catholic/Christian values based argument in an academic setting. So before we go further...do they market themselves that way...well on their web page it says "Marquette is a Catholic and Jesuit university located in Milwaukee, Wis...." That clarified...junior faculty member Cheryl Abbate was out of bounds...VERY OBVIOUSLY when she went after the student as she did. Now, it was an ethics class, not a morals class, but the distinction is not so simple in practice. There are indeed ethical implications. Say a christian living in a homosexual marriage is attending church and partaking of the sacrament...as we unravel the moral issues, we come to the issue where the priest depends on you assessing your own state of grace based on some principles...that is space for ethical discussions in my book. Anyway, if you are so out of touch with the backgrounds of the students you'd likely teach, and are unprepared to address those concerns constructively in the classroom, you were misplaced as an instructor...who does that fall upon that someone intolerant of faith based reasoning is leading a class at a supposed faith based institution? I am 100% certain this confrontation is not the student's fault, yet he is the one made to suffer...that is so completely unacceptable it should be a form of negligence that a christian student was exposed to this kind of behavior at a self-proclaimed Catholic institution.

Now, for one professor to nail another in public...I can't condone that. If a member of my management team did that to another, I'd fire him/her. So it is hard for me to hammer Marquette if that is the rationale behind their discipline of Professor McAdams...but it doesn't sound like that is the case. In fact it sounds like the President is doing things the McAdams not called for by their little tribunal. At what point does the Catholic Church step in and force Marquette to disassociate itself from Catholicism? I think that time should be near.

In my view the administration at Marquette is composed of very poor excuses for leaders...they are all at once cowards and con artists. Those that would benefit from the Catholic association, and then allow christian values to be censored within its walls are a special case of awful human beings deserving of scorn and rebuke. I mean we aren't just talking about an environment that provides space for arguing against/testing faith-based principles here...we are talking about outright censorship. That kind of behavior cannot stand unchallenged.

EDIT: other sources claim the class in question was a philosophy course on "Theory of Ethics" . That actually makes what Cheryl Abbate and the administration did much, much worse. Seriously...anything coherent (sometimes not so coherent) can be the basis of a view and discussion in a philosophy class...I'd think one of the oldest sources of coherent thought regarding morals and ethics might be at least permitted....at a Catholic University.
 
Last edited:

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,159
7 Harsh Realities Of Life Millennials Need To Understand « The Burning Platform

7 Harsh Realities Of Life Millennials Need To Understand


Posted on 9th March 2016 by Administrator in Economy

life, Millennials, reality


Via The Libertarian Republic



Millennials.

They may not yet be the present, but they’re certainly the future. These young, uninitiated minds will someday soon become our politicians, doctors, scientists, chefs, television producers, fashion designers, manufacturers, and, one would hope, the new proponents of liberty. But are they ready for it?

Time after time, particularly on college campuses, millennials have proven to be little more than entitled, spoiled, anti-intellectual brats who place far too much emphasis on feelings and nowhere near enough emphasis on critical thinking. To the millennial, words are cause for the creation of safe spaces, alternative ideas must be stifled, and anything they perceive to be a microaggression is enough to send them spiraling into a state of mental distress.

It’s time millennials understood these 7 harsh realities of life so we don’t end up with a generation of gutless adult babies running the show.

1. Your Feelings Are Largely Irrelevant

Seriously, nobody who has already graduated college cares about your feelings. That means that when you complain to your boss because your co-worker mis-gendered you, he’s probably not going to bend over backwards to bandage your wounds. Given feelings are entirely subjective in nature, it’s completely unreasonable to demand everyone tip-toe around you to prevent yours from being hurt. The reality is that people will offend you and hurt your feelings, and they won’t stop to mop up your tears because they shouldn’t have to. Learning to accept criticism, alternative viewpoints, and even outright insults will make you happier in the long run than routinely playing the victim card.




2. You Cannot Be Whatever You Want To Be

This is a comforting lie parents have started telling their children to boost their morale in school. Unfortunately, millennials are now convinced it’s true, especially as society has now decided to push this narrative as well. The reality is if you’re 17 years old and still can’t figure out basic division, you’re not going to be a rocket scientist. If you’re overweight and unattractive, you’re not going to be the quarterback’s prom date. If you lack fine motor skills, you’re not going to be a heart surgeon. It’s okay to accept that you cannot be whatever you want to be. In fact, once you accept this, you’ll be able to focus on the things you can be — the things you really are talented at.


3. Gender Studies Is A Waste Of Money

You heard me. While some millennials taking useless degrees will claim they’re beneficial for teaching or research positions, the reality is that they just put themselves several thousands dollars in debt to learn how to be a professional victim. While you’re struggling to make ends meet after graduation because nobody who pays more than minimum wage is interested in your qualifications and you’re drowning in student loan debt, be sure to check out the next harsh reality before you start complaining.

4. If You Live In America, You’re Already In The 1%

That’s right. Even though you work at McDonald’s for minimum wage because you got a useless, outrageously expensive college degree, you’re still far better off than the vast majority of the planet. Don’t believe me? Fly to Uganda and check out the living conditions there. Fly to China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Iran, Russia, and even European countries like Ukraine and Greece, and you’ll quickly discover just how well-off you really are. While it may be cool these days to dump on capitalism, it’s the only reason you aren’t already worse off.

5. You Don’t Have A Right To It Just Because You Exist

That includes healthcare, guaranteed income, and somewhere to live. Just because you’re here and breathing doesn’t mean society owes you anything. Like the billions of people who lived before you, working hard is a better guarantor of wealth and the ability to comfortably take care of yourself than begging society or the government to do it for you. Demanding healthcare be a right, for example, is equivalent to demanding government force the taxpayer to pay for it. While that may seem like a good idea in theory, it only leads to rationing of care when costs become unsustainable, which negatively impacts not just your health, but everyone else’s, too.

6. You DO Have The Right To Live As You Please — But Not To Demand People Accept It

By contrast, you do have the right to live however you please, so long as it’s within the confines of the law. If you want to cross-dress, smoke marijuana, drink lots of alcohol, have lots of sex, and, yes, even go to school for gender studies, then by all means, go for it. Government should not be allowed to legislate people’s behavior as long as it doesn’t infringe upon someone else’s rights, but that doesn’t mean society isn’t allowed to have an opinion. You don’t have the right to demand people keep their opinions about your lifestyle to themselves, especially if you’re open and public about it. I have as much of a right to comment on the way you live your life as you do to actually live it. Your feelings are not a protected right, but my speech is.


7. The Only Safe Space Is Your Home

No matter where you go in life, someone will be there to offend you. Maybe it’s a joke you overheard on vacation, a spat at the office, or a difference of opinion with someone in line at the grocery store. Inevitably, someone will offend you and your values. If you cannot handle that without losing control of your emotions and reverting back to your “safe space” away from the harmful words of others, then you’re best to just stay put at home. Remember, though: if people in the outside world scare you, people on the internet will downright terrify you. It’s probably best to just accept these harsh realities of life and go out into the world prepared to confront them wherever they may be waiting.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,696
Reaction score
5,996
7 Harsh Realities Of Life Millennials Need To Understand « The Burning Platform

7 Harsh Realities Of Life Millennials Need To Understand


Posted on 9th March 2016 by Administrator in Economy

life, Millennials, reality


Via The Libertarian Republic



Millennials.

They may not yet be the present, but they’re certainly the future. These young, uninitiated minds will someday soon become our politicians, doctors, scientists, chefs, television producers, fashion designers, manufacturers, and, one would hope, the new proponents of liberty. But are they ready for it?

Time after time, particularly on college campuses, millennials have proven to be little more than entitled, spoiled, anti-intellectual brats who place far too much emphasis on feelings and nowhere near enough emphasis on critical thinking. To the millennial, words are cause for the creation of safe spaces, alternative ideas must be stifled, and anything they perceive to be a microaggression is enough to send them spiraling into a state of mental distress.

It’s time millennials understood these 7 harsh realities of life so we don’t end up with a generation of gutless adult babies running the show.

1. Your Feelings Are Largely Irrelevant

Seriously, nobody who has already graduated college cares about your feelings. That means that when you complain to your boss because your co-worker mis-gendered you, he’s probably not going to bend over backwards to bandage your wounds. Given feelings are entirely subjective in nature, it’s completely unreasonable to demand everyone tip-toe around you to prevent yours from being hurt. The reality is that people will offend you and hurt your feelings, and they won’t stop to mop up your tears because they shouldn’t have to. Learning to accept criticism, alternative viewpoints, and even outright insults will make you happier in the long run than routinely playing the victim card.




2. You Cannot Be Whatever You Want To Be

This is a comforting lie parents have started telling their children to boost their morale in school. Unfortunately, millennials are now convinced it’s true, especially as society has now decided to push this narrative as well. The reality is if you’re 17 years old and still can’t figure out basic division, you’re not going to be a rocket scientist. If you’re overweight and unattractive, you’re not going to be the quarterback’s prom date. If you lack fine motor skills, you’re not going to be a heart surgeon. It’s okay to accept that you cannot be whatever you want to be. In fact, once you accept this, you’ll be able to focus on the things you can be — the things you really are talented at.


3. Gender Studies Is A Waste Of Money

You heard me. While some millennials taking useless degrees will claim they’re beneficial for teaching or research positions, the reality is that they just put themselves several thousands dollars in debt to learn how to be a professional victim. While you’re struggling to make ends meet after graduation because nobody who pays more than minimum wage is interested in your qualifications and you’re drowning in student loan debt, be sure to check out the next harsh reality before you start complaining.

4. If You Live In America, You’re Already In The 1%

That’s right. Even though you work at McDonald’s for minimum wage because you got a useless, outrageously expensive college degree, you’re still far better off than the vast majority of the planet. Don’t believe me? Fly to Uganda and check out the living conditions there. Fly to China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Iran, Russia, and even European countries like Ukraine and Greece, and you’ll quickly discover just how well-off you really are. While it may be cool these days to dump on capitalism, it’s the only reason you aren’t already worse off.

5. You Don’t Have A Right To It Just Because You Exist

That includes healthcare, guaranteed income, and somewhere to live. Just because you’re here and breathing doesn’t mean society owes you anything. Like the billions of people who lived before you, working hard is a better guarantor of wealth and the ability to comfortably take care of yourself than begging society or the government to do it for you. Demanding healthcare be a right, for example, is equivalent to demanding government force the taxpayer to pay for it. While that may seem like a good idea in theory, it only leads to rationing of care when costs become unsustainable, which negatively impacts not just your health, but everyone else’s, too.

6. You DO Have The Right To Live As You Please — But Not To Demand People Accept It

By contrast, you do have the right to live however you please, so long as it’s within the confines of the law. If you want to cross-dress, smoke marijuana, drink lots of alcohol, have lots of sex, and, yes, even go to school for gender studies, then by all means, go for it. Government should not be allowed to legislate people’s behavior as long as it doesn’t infringe upon someone else’s rights, but that doesn’t mean society isn’t allowed to have an opinion. You don’t have the right to demand people keep their opinions about your lifestyle to themselves, especially if you’re open and public about it. I have as much of a right to comment on the way you live your life as you do to actually live it. Your feelings are not a protected right, but my speech is.


7. The Only Safe Space Is Your Home

No matter where you go in life, someone will be there to offend you. Maybe it’s a joke you overheard on vacation, a spat at the office, or a difference of opinion with someone in line at the grocery store. Inevitably, someone will offend you and your values. If you cannot handle that without losing control of your emotions and reverting back to your “safe space” away from the harmful words of others, then you’re best to just stay put at home. Remember, though: if people in the outside world scare you, people on the internet will downright terrify you. It’s probably best to just accept these harsh realities of life and go out into the world prepared to confront them wherever they may be waiting.

Honestly, I'm pretty okay with many of my peers being soft. It tells me if I want to leave the rugged North, I can probably get a job with ease and get promoted relative to these clowns very quickly.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
Honestly, I'm pretty okay with many of my peers being soft. It tells me if I want to leave the rugged North, I can probably get a job with ease and get promoted relative to these clowns very quickly.

Your peers will appreciate that, as well. After all, they need someone to make a lot of money, so they can take it for their "entitlements".

:wink:
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
It's comical to me when older people rag on millennials like they are the problem. There are more entitlements for old people than young. It's the old people reaping the rewards of pensions, draining social security and lowering worker productivity.

I've hired a lot of people and will tell you now that I would take a millennial over a seasoned guy for entry to entry-mid positions. I find that the millennials to the ones that are hungry, still eager to learn and not yet jaded by the drain of a career.

It always seems to me that you see a lot of older people acting like they deserve more than millennials simply because they have been around longer. That is entitlement.
 

Black Irish

Wise Guy
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
602
How long before "Millennial" becomes a forbidden word of micro-aggression?

"Stop trying to define me by the range my birth year falls into!"
 

GoldenDome

New member
Messages
808
Reaction score
61
It's comical to me when older people rag on millennials like they are the problem. There are more entitlements for old people than young. It's the old people reaping the rewards of pensions, draining social security and lowering worker productivity.

I've hired a lot of people and will tell you now that I would take a millennial over a seasoned guy for entry to entry-mid positions. I find that the millennials to the ones that are hungry, still eager to learn and not yet jaded by the drain of a career.

It always seems to me that you see a lot of older people acting like they deserve more than millennials simply because they have been around longer. That is entitlement.

A true sign of categorization into the "get off my lawn" demographic.

One can hope we all don't become grumpy, crusty and disdainful.
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
It's comical to me when older people rag on millennials like they are the problem. There are more entitlements for old people than young. It's the old people reaping the rewards of pensions, draining social security and lowering worker productivity.

I've hired a lot of people and will tell you now that I would take a millennial over a seasoned guy for entry to entry-mid positions. I find that the millennials to the ones that are hungry, still eager to learn and not yet jaded by the drain of a career.

It always seems to me that you see a lot of older people acting like they deserve more than millennials simply because they have been around longer. That is entitlement.
That's because you're hiring millennials with Finance degrees. We're not representative of the cohort.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,696
Reaction score
5,996
That's because you're hiring millennials with Finance degrees. We're not representative of the cohort.

Yeah, hey wooly, if you need to hire a white caucasian from America's breadbasket for diversity purposes, throw a job offer out. I do have a Finance degree after all.

:D
 
Top