It's sarcastic, but the articles they reference and link to are 100% real.That's like a knock-off Onion article, right?
What are you talking about? The article links to The New Yorker and The Atlantic, arguably the two signature publications of the intellectual elite.This is a good example of what I brought up before about "faux PC". This isn't a reputable, reliable or even known source with this article. It's no different than some crazy Onion article being taken out of context by someone.
This is a good example of what I brought up before about "faux PC". This isn't a reputable, reliable or even known source with this article. It's no different than some crazy Onion article being taken out of context by someone.
What are you talking about? The article links to The New Yorker and The Atlantic, arguably the two signature publications of the intellectual elite.
The point of the blog is to call out the "reputable sources" and they link directly to them... they specifically call out The Atlantic and The New Yorker. Are The Atlantic and The New Yorker not legitimate publications in your mind?
Do you know anybody who's currently in college? My sister just wrapped up sophomore year at BC and it's exactly as bad as the memes make it appear.It's not real, it is exaggerated.
Do you know anybody who's currently in college? My sister just wrapped up sophomore year at BC and it's exactly as bad as the memes make it appear.
I'm not seeing vulgar language and personal attacks on FB and the lot from granola pushing libs. I'm seeing it from the angry "Anti-PC" crowd that feels their free speech also gives them free passage to vulgarity, anger, attacks, and bigotry.
I think you may be seeing what you want to see on this one. The internet and social media brings out the worst in many people, from all walks, but saying you are seeing no vulgarity, venom and intrusive or violent behavior from the PC left?? I mean, yeah you're wearing blinders...
I think it's important to note here that no one who is taken seriously by anyone is out there validating, empowering or normalizing the Alt Right.
I would argue that anyone supporting the Trump administration is validating, empowering and normalizing the Alt Right...
Yup... it's those pesky anti PCers who are the problem...
Well I can say this... I'm not convinced that there even is a large population of "PC'ers" in this country. Judging by the amount of people that voted for Trump, there certainly seems to be a good population of "Anti-PC" people out there.
While IE certainly isn't a microcosm of the country's population, it would also be worth noting that I can't remember the last post that could be considered someone being overly PC, but I can tell you we have an entire thread to make fun of them....
and I'm not convinced the Alt Right is even a thing large enough to even warrant discussing... let alone having any real influence anywhere. I'll continue this dialogue after my next emergency meeting on "Micro Aggressions: How to not Offend Anyone Whilst Breathing,"...
also, your edit on Trump is laughable... Trump being some anti PC figure head is fine as he's easily one of if not THE least PC political figure out there... but he's not Alt Right nor a figure head, that's your blinders talking.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-rightThe alt-right has also had a significant influence on conservative thought in the United States, such as the Sailer Strategy, along with having close ties to the Trump administration. It has been listed as a key reason for Trump's win in the 2016 election.[43][44] The Trump administration has also brought in several figures who are associated with the alt-right, such as White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. [45] In 2016, he described Breitbart as "the platform for the alt-right," and with the goal of promoting the ideology.
Literally a month ago. I believe I posted about it in this thread.Really... when was the last time you had to attend a meeting on "micro-aggressions"?
Really... when was the last time you had to attend a meeting on "micro-aggressions"?
Literally a month ago. I believe I posted about it in this thread.
We honest to God have them often....
Show me an example.
Yes. I know people in college, some that work at a University and several that teach. I'm sure you found one person to agree with you and that is enough, but I highly disagree.
I remember that in the early 2000's the Vagina Monologues did a campus tour around Michigan. People uproared, protested, etc. But it wasn't some over arching implication to society. But in today's social media drawn world, there would have been articles, people wearing vagina hats and folks like you on the interwebs claiming it's the end of the world.
But... it would be no different. Our lense is different today, the actual actions I don't believe are really that much more different. In fact, I would argue that the entire "Anti-PC" movement has done more damage (ie bringing us Trump) than the actual PC movement. Hell... someone telling me I'm insensitive doesn't change my world. But I can tell you that the Anti-PC crowd is more offensive in my world. I'm not seeing vulgar language and personal attacks on FB and the lot from granola pushing libs. I'm seeing it from the angry "Anti-PC" crowd that feels their free speech also gives them free passage to vulgarity, anger, attacks, and bigotry.
My broader point is that the entire "PC vs Anti-PC" debate has brought out the worst in people. Not the other way around.
Of like an email request for one of these meetings? LOL, you're something... I'll have to let that simmer for a bit as my instinct is I'm definitely not comfortable sharing that on IE... if you are calling me a liar then hey, you do you.