JughedJones
Banned
- Messages
- 3,147
- Reaction score
- 359
Do you think children should obey teachers when they ask them to follow the rules of the class?
yup.
but I... stick with me... don't think adults should hit kids.
It's crazy, I know.
Do you think children should obey teachers when they ask them to follow the rules of the class?
yup.
but I... stick with me... don't think adults should hit kids.
It's crazy, I know.
So, interesting conversation in one of my wife's classes yesterday.
She had a girl state to the class that she was proud of the girl in the video because she was standing up for the rights of students to use their cell phones during class.
Yeah, that didn't go over very well.
Of course, there were no children injured during that conversation...
I've already said, in this thread, that the amount of force used was disturbing. But at some point, you malcontents are going to have to stop just automatically blaming "aggro cops", and start admitting that some of these kids and their parents share the blame. The cop wouldn't even have been there if this girl's parents had demanded that this girl have even basic respect for authority.
I've spent a lot of time in classrooms. I truly cannot understand anyone watching the video and thinking that the amount of force used is acceptable.
He didn't hit her. He didn't "slam her to the ground". He tried to remove her from the chair, and she fought back. At the point that she hit the officer, in my opinion she gave up the right to be looked at as a child interacting with an adult. If she had acted like a child, and just curled up into the fetal position, that is one thing; but she struck the officer. Children are taught not to hit police officers. Children are taught to obey the rules of the classroom. Children are taught to respect the authority of teachers and school administrators. That's basic parenting.
I've already said, in this thread, that the amount of force used was disturbing. But at some point, you malcontents are going to have to stop just automatically blaming "aggro cops", and start admitting that some of these kids and their parents share the blame. The cop wouldn't even have been there if this girl's parents had demanded that this girl have even basic respect for authority.
Nobody -- not a single person -- has made any excuses for the girl's behavior. It was disgusting. But, she is a child. You, however, seem to be making excuses for the officer who knocked the girl's desk over, ripped her violently from it and tossed her across the room because she would not comply with his demands. He lost his temper and went too far because how dare anyone question his authority, especially an an obstinate child. His actions had the potential to physically harm the girl and others in the classroom. You seem to be saying that he was justified and that her parents are horrible and that she has given up her rights. Anything exept admitting that the resource officer did anything wrong. He apparently has a history of rough treatment of students. Why are you defending his actions, Moose? I just don't get you sometimes.
The video was pretty hard to watch
I'm not saying that she deserved to be manhandled like she was, but don't kids also have to change their behaviors in cases like this?
I've already said, in this thread, that the amount of force used was disturbing.
I can totally understand how you would think that I am defending the actions of the cop in this situation.
I guess fvck teaching kids respect for authority, huh?
I thought that the cop was actually kind of calm. .
He tried to pick her up out of the desk, but because of the mechanics of it, he ended up picking up her AND the desk, too. He didn't "slam" her to the floor; the desk just flipped over with her in it. He then pulled her out of the chair as it was on the floor. She was not going willingly, so he had to pull pretty hard, and she got tossed pretty good at that point. After she is out and he is on top of her, getting ready to cuff her, you can hear him telling her quite calmly to give him her hands. He doesn't sound out of control and screaming at all.
So she gets to make adult decisions on who she obeys at school, but she is a child when the consequences come down on her?
Ok. Taken without context, I can see why someone might see this as a defense of the SRO's actions. However, let's put it into context:I thought that the cop was actually kind of calm. He tried to pick her up out of the desk, but because of the mechanics of it, he ended up picking up her AND the desk, too. He didn't "slam" her to the floor; the desk just flipped over with her in it. He then pulled her out of the chair as it was on the floor. She was not going willingly, so he had to pull pretty hard, and she got tossed pretty good at that point. After she is out and he is on top of her, getting ready to cuff her, you can hear him telling her quite calmly to give him her hands. He doesn't sound out of control and screaming at all.
Because we're a society of sadistic assholes apparently. This kid wasn't breaking any laws so why in the hell was law enforcement involved? If the kid doesn't want to learn oh well, call her parents and suspend her from school. Instead we call in Rambo and kill a fly with a bazzoka. Good job America.
So she gets to make adult decisions on who she obeys at school, but she is a child when the consequences come down on her? If she is a child, then she should be obeying the teacher, principal, AND the police.
Wasnt this a little girl?...
So you think that the entire blame in this situation has to lie on one side or the other? They couldn't both have been at fault, could they?
The cop got fired, and justifiably so, in my mind. So what consequence do you "she's a child" folks think is appropriate for the girl?
Cop handled it incorrectly.
Girl is to blame for starting the situation. Obey the rules and nothing happens.
Both need to suffer the consequences.
I actually have been saying this the entire time. Certainly she shares in the blame, but his reaction far exceeded what her infraction was. The fact that he is an adult and a resouce officer whose job it is to protect children makes it worse.
Well, the child got tossed around in her classroom by a grown man. She was humilitated in front of her classmates and it was broadcast all over the world on social media. And arrested -- lets not forget that she was arrested. I expect that arrest will result in a court appearance if this dumb shit's actions don't make that go away. I expect any judge is going to conclude that she was a snotty teenager who deserved to write 100 times on the board "I will not use my cell phone in class," and the involvement of law enforcement, let alone the courts is way past something that is reasonable. But, do tell ... what punishment do you think she deserves for refusing to put her phone away and getting out of her seat?
Hundreds of students walked out of class around 10 a.m. and into the school's atrium before school administrators returned the students to class.
Principal Jeff Temoney told the students none of them would be suspended if they returned to class.
"We've heard your voices, okay," Temoney said. "We appreciate you taking time to do this, but again, as you know, we always focus on teaching and learning, so let's head on back to class."
It wasn't spot-checking based on suspicious activity. It was more like a checkpoint. Everyone's bag gets searched. Apparently it happens regularly. Maybe it's under the same umbrella where TSA agents can search every person & bag that goes onto a plane. I guess as long as you're on WMATA property, you're subject to warrantless searches? Who knows? Just rubs me the wrong way.
So about 100 students out of 2100 were involved in the walkout? Just wondering because context is everything.
Hundreds of students walked out of class around 10 a.m. and into the school's atrium before school administrators returned the students to class.
"About 100" ... Changing the story to fit your narrative, nice.
Actually, the article says hundreds, plural, and the students were quickly shooed back to class. For clarity I included below the sentence you had difficulty reading.
Check the short video that accompanied the article. If you actually look, you will see a diverse group of students, black and white, male and female, standing up for Fields.
BTW, notice that the protesters didn't throw rocks, burn cars, nor loot sores. They protested peacefully and moved on when authorities asked them to. Bravo for them.
Wow. How many cops do they need to respond to a noise complaint? There were like 10 cops there.
I think the officer who originally responded to the complaint called for backup when the kids became uncooperative and confrontational. This incident shows it's not just Blacks who have these type of encounters with the police. If you show your ass and act like an idiot when dealing with the cops, things tend to go badly regardless of your race.
I think the officer who originally responded to the complaint called for backup when the kids became uncooperative and confrontational. This incident shows it's not just Blacks who have these type of encounters with the police. If you show your ass and act like an idiot when dealing with the cops, things tend to go badly regardless of your race.
If the kids daddy would have beat his as* growing up when he misbehaved, there would probably not be a reason for the cops to beat his as* now. Just sayin.
Guys this is America, you can tell a cop to go pound sand, his response shouldn't be to hit you with the cattle prod. The guy was dragged out of his home and beaten in front of his girl friend for a freaking noise complaint. Do you two root for the empire in Star Wars?