IrishInFl
Back in Florida
- Messages
- 5,288
- Reaction score
- 424
There is absolutely nothing on this planet more dorky than trying to pick up chicks playing Pokemon.
Trying? There is no try with my game.
There is absolutely nothing on this planet more dorky than trying to pick up chicks playing Pokemon.
Trying? There is no try with my game.
I'm sure that with your mad game, the Pokemon dork had no chance.
I hope you you tickled her pikachu.
I'm sure that with your mad game, the Pokemon dork had no chance.
I hope you you tickled her pikachu.
🖕p.s. I bought Nintendo stock the day this was released and I am planning on paying my student loans with the proceeds.
It was only a matter of time........... and these two clowns were lucky:
2 'Pokemon Go' players plunge off cliff - FOX5 Vegas - KVVU
Article doesn't say what they were chasing, or if the caught it. 2/10
I hate your list but let's add bad coffee to it.Yesterday at the park I looked around and had a moment of clarity. I realized that Pokemon Go is for children and poors. It has been uninstalled.
Sent from my Galaxy Note4 using Tapatalk.
Yesterday at the park I looked around and had a moment of clarity. I realized that Pokemon Go is for children and poors. It has been uninstalled.
Sent from my Galaxy Note4 using Tapatalk.
Yesterday at the park I looked around and had a moment of clarity. I realized that Pokemon Go is for children and poors. It has been uninstalled.
Sent from my Galaxy Note4 using Tapatalk.
I ordered some salmon-colored pants from Vineyard Vines yesterday and I'm currently wearing a baby blue and white striped Brooks Brothers golf shirt while drinking from a Pat the Patriot Tervis. So no, I don't care what Wooly thinks.You goddamn sellout.
Is Wooly's approval really that important to you?
I ordered some salmon-colored pants from Vineyard Vines yesterday and I'm currently wearing a baby blue and white striped Brooks Brothers golf shirt while drinking from a Pat the Patriot Tervis. So no, I don't care what Wooly thinks.
I ordered some salmon-colored pants from Vineyard Vines yesterday and I'm currently wearing a baby blue and white striped Brooks Brothers golf shirt while drinking from a Pat the Patriot Tervis. So no, I don't care what Wooly thinks.
p.s. I bought Nintendo stock the day this was released and I am planning on paying my student loans with the proceeds.
I'd sell now. No way this momentum keeps up.
It's way over-reflected in the current stock price. The increases are based on emotion, not financial information. Stupid people are buying Nintendo and running it up. It's not institutional investors investing based on fundamentals.Haven't even released in China, South America, most of Europe.... it's a massive hit, only question is whether or not it's already reflected in the increased stock price.
It's way over-reflected in the current stock price. The increases are based on emotion, not financial information. Stupid people are buying Nintendo and running it up. It's not institutional investors investing based on fundamentals.
That estimation doesn't work. Nintendo is trading at multiples of daily active users that startups get. A mature company isn't going to grow like a tech startup, no matter how popular their app gets.Maybe, they added $17 billion to their market cap with stock price increase. However, the app (evaluated as an asset on par with something like Twitter) is worth at least $10-$15 billion by crude estimation. So if it's currently over-reflected it's marginal.
Haven't even released in China, South America, most of Europe.... it's a massive hit, only question is whether or not it's already reflected in the increased stock price.
That estimation doesn't work. Nintendo is trading at multiples of daily active users that startups get. A mature company isn't going to grow like a tech startup, no matter how popular their app gets.
....
I don't know where to start.
1) It hasn't come even close to hitting peak users.
2) I'm using projected direct annual revenue of the app to gauge it.
Look at what King (the Candy Crush guys) sold for.... $6 billion. It doesn't hold a candle to what Niantic's Pokemon Go is as an asset. I'm not sure what's hard about this... my estimation can't possibly be accurate with limited information, but it is inarguable that the valuation of the asset would be north of 10 billion if spun off.
Pokemon Go is fundamentally different (see: worse) than Candy Crush as an asset for several reasons.....
I don't know where to start.
1) It hasn't come even close to hitting peak users.
2) I'm using projected direct annual revenue of the app to gauge it.
Look at what King (the Candy Crush guys) sold for.... $6 billion. It doesn't hold a candle to what Niantic's Pokemon Go is as an asset. I'm not sure what's hard about this... my estimation can't possibly be accurate with limited information, but it is inarguable that the valuation of the asset would be north of 10 billion if spun off.
Pokemon Go is fundamentally different (see: worse) than Candy Crush as an asset for several reasons.
1. EVERYONE played Candy Crush, including children and older adults. Pokemon Go is primarily teenagers and young adults. There are large segments of the population that are either too old to have any childhood nostalgia for Pokemon or too young to be wandering around the streets by themselves.
2. Pokemon Go is contingent on the social aspect to be successful. The same forces that caused it to rapidly catch fire will also cause its eventual decline. We see it all the time in online multiplayer games. Once the community stops growing, it can decline quickly and servers die.
3. Maintenance and development costs. Self-explanatory.
4. Safety concerns. People are getting hurt and even killed playing this game. That's not going to play well with parents.
The other thing to keep in mind is that Nintendo only owns ~30% of Pokémon Go.