ND Coaching Changes 2016

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
'17 IN WR Mac Hippenhammer (Penn State Verbal)

'17 IN WR Mac Hippenhammer (Penn State Verbal)

Yup. I've been a huge critic of our recruiting philosophy for years and I think the proof is in the pudding. You're better offer taking lots of guys that really want to be here early in the cycle and then figuring out the other pieces later. There is always room for big fish. It makes no sense to approach guys like Hippenhammer how we did, much less Oliver Martin who was a true stud recruit. And we do this crap every year, while chasing a bunch of Cali players that will inevitably fail at ND like 90% of them do.



Guys who really want to be here almost always outperform their ranking. Onwualu and Love are recent examples. Schmidt when he was healthy for that one half a year played way above a no-star PWO level. Eifert. Both Martins. You can make a list of the most productive players to come through ND and very few of them were "recruiting wars" from the southeast or west coast to convince them to come here. Guys like Tuitt are an exception.



Four straight years of classes full of depth holes and ranked outside the top 10. Obviously, we need a guy that will recruit a different way than Kelly has. He has been a failure on the trail.



Realistically can't you say Davie, Willingham, Weis and Kelly have all been a failure on the trail. Doesn't that indicate the problem is not with the coaches, but with the University and program as a whole. Or more accurate is the landscape of college football and how Notre Dame will never be able to recruit with the big boys. We all know Notre Dame has the academic restrictions. And unlike even a Stanford Notre Dame's home state doesn't produce talent, Stanford has Cali. Notre Dame is not in Cali, Florida, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Louisiana, North Carolina, etc. Not to mention the weather is South Bend, Indiana sucks during the winter. Drastically different than Palo Alto.

Davie was able to recruit decent classes, but his teams lacked speed and try difference makers.

Don't even need to say anything about Willingham's lack of recruiting effort.

Weis recruited well. But left many holes on defense, especially defensive line and holes in the offensive line. He also shot for the stars and missed way to many times. He was never able to add the depth due to this.

And Kelly's recruiting failures have been well documented in this site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459
Realistically can't you say Davie, Willingham, Weis and Kelly have all been a failure on the trail. Doesn't that indicate the problem is not with the coaches, but with the University and program as a whole. Or more accurate is the landscape of college football and how Notre Dame will never be able to recruit with the big boys. We all know Notre Dame has the academic restrictions. And unlike even a Stanford Notre Dame's home state doesn't produce talent, Stanford has Cali. Notre Dame is not in Cali, Florida, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Louisiana, North Carolina, etc. Not to mention the weather is South Bend, Indiana sucks during the winter. Drastically different than Palo Alto.

Davie was able to recruit decent classes, but his teams lacked speed and try difference makers.

Don't even need to say anything about Willingham's lack of recruiting effort.

Weis recruited well. But left many holes on defense, especially defensive line and holes in the offensive line. He also shot for the stars and missed way to many times. He was never able to add the depth due to this.

And Kelly's recruiting failures have been well documented in this site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The talent Indiana does produce, ND doesn't seem to recruit very well. But there is always Jaylon and The Shark both coming from Indiana.
 

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
Realistically can't you say Davie, Willingham, Weis and Kelly have all been a failure on the trail. Doesn't that indicate the problem is not with the coaches, but with the University and program as a whole. Or more accurate is the landscape of college football and how Notre Dame will never be able to recruit with the big boys. We all know Notre Dame has the academic restrictions. And unlike even a Stanford Notre Dame's home state doesn't produce talent, Stanford has Cali. Notre Dame is not in Cali, Florida, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Louisiana, North Carolina, etc. Not to mention the weather is South Bend, Indiana sucks during the winter. Drastically different than Palo Alto.

Davie was able to recruit decent classes, but his teams lacked speed and try difference makers.

Don't even need to say anything about Willingham's lack of recruiting effort.

Weis recruited well. But left many holes on defense, especially defensive line and holes in the offensive line. He also shot for the stars and missed way to many times. He was never able to add the depth due to this.

And Kelly's recruiting failures have been well documented in this site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Sherm your first two sentences point out it recruiting is a University problem because the last four coaches had no success. Then you kind of rip those 4 coaches recruiting prowess.
So which is it the coaches or UND?

Other coaches have recruited well and coached well. ND had a location/education disadvantage competing with the football factories then too.

Davie had deep ties to Texas schools from his A&M days and used it recruiting for Holtz and himself. Davie also took to ND into FL and the southlands. By '97 half the roster was from south of the Mason Dixon Line. I wrote an article for the Irish Recruiting Journal on the shift in ND's recruiting base. Davie also made ND brought ND camp's up to major college standards. This had the added benefit of exposing recruits to the ND environment including academics. Regardless of his recruiting abilities, his assistants left much to be desired on the recruiting trail and on the field, Colletto, Rodgers, et al. And after Holtz's confrontations with ND Admissions, with and without Cerrato, Davie made no waves to Admissions. Offers weren't official until Admission gave their Nihil Obstat. Dave deferred. Where Holtz/Cerrato had scraped, finessed, bamboozled, or 11th hour time played Admissions, Davie rolled over understanding Malloy and croonies were backing Admissions to the hilt. Keep in mind that in those days ND required 16 core course hours while the NCAA only required 12. Most kids didn't take the courses ND required. And were told if they wanted to come to ND they had to load up their Senior year with tough courses at the same time improving GPAs. Highly touted WR David Terrell committed to ND but Admissions wanted Terrell to retake a course and improve the grade Terriell flipped to Michigan and became a star. Davie once again proved that ND is no place for OJT, on or off the field.

Willingham had success at Stanford but his lack of recruiting interest at ND was probably the worst in ND history. He did get some questionable recruits in, one had a 800 SAT, excelled on the field and graduated on time. Willingham truly ran the program into the ground, leaving his successor with huge wholes in the OLine and other places. After ruining ND, Willingham went to UW and ruined that program.

Weis never should have been hired. See the OJT comment above. Nobly Weis stayed the course with his then current employers through the Super Bowl. Unfamiliar with recruiting egos he withdrew an offer to a recruit who was upset because Weis couldn't make a home visit because of time conflicts with New England. Foolishly UND let the Patriots come before the Irish. Weis's NFL demeanor did work with a lot of recruits and players. He also made gaffs like Davie did hiring assistants (and we can add Kelly and Willingham to that list). Had Cutcliffe not had a heart attack requiring his withdrawal as a coach things might have been better for Weis but he still made fundamental management and coaching mistakes. Without JUCO's to plug into Willingham's lack of OL recruitment, Weis had to swing at the fences for the top OLs, the one he got was forced to start as a freshman and didn't receive the weight room development nor technique that a redshirt year would have provided. He never reached the expectations set for him. Weis did make a number of inroads with the ND Administration among them as an alumni he understood ND's academic emphasis. Where Holtz had fought Rooney and Admissions, and Davie and Willingham had rolled over in deference, Weis approached Saracino (Rooney's successor) to get an understanding of what ND Admissions looked for in a recruit's transcript, core courses, and character. Weis in turn educated his assistants in Admissions way and instructed them to seek out underclassman and instill in them, their coaches, etc what the recruit needed to do as a sophomore, junior, and first semester senior to enable Admissions to give their OK. No need to rehash Schematic Advantage nor Weis's lack of success in subsequent college coaching gigs.

Kelly did well coaching at several places with the lower rated players those schools and their opponents usually got. Two of the big questions with him when he came to ND was could he recruit nationally and could he compete on the field with the big dawg schools and coaches. I believe he's done better than his 3 predecessors but still made the similar management errors in hiring staff. Where Weis hired people he had never worked with Kelly insisted on bringing his small fish staff from his small fish previous employer. Assistant who like Weis's were a mixed bag in recruiting. It requires all the staff not just some of them. Kelly also exhibited an arrogance similar to Weis in doing the same thing over and over despite it not working time after time. "Get used to it." Kelly did get a training table at ND something Malloy and his predecessors had fought for against generations of ND coaches.

Three of these coaches never should have been hired. The fourth was on the cusp of the winning percentage of the great ND coaches ... till the Frozen Five, ND's retroactive ineligibility, the last drive with MJ and a gun ... none of which were the coaching staff's responsiblity. ND has Du lac, Res Life, and places accountability in the student. But expect the coaching staff to win with reduced numbers and replace them with freshman ... and still win.

Who hired these coaches? Not the location in Indiana. Not the weather, diversity, parietals, small dorms, tough academic requirements and lack of cake courses an degrees. The UND Adminstration is the common denominator.

UND has a similar history for more than 80 years. Rockne's death was sad, yet a relief to the ND Administration. He ran the show and they resented that in spades. They didn't replace him with another successful coach. They threw in a former player with coaching experience but chopped the number of scholarships. When Leahy won 4 National Championship working inhuman hours and his health was compromised he asked for a year's leave of absence to recover. The new ND president didn't care for football once again being bigger than the University. So the president who would be know for his championing civil rights, promoted the Freshman Coach to Head Coach. He was an All-American RB for ND so that obviously qualified him to win at the Winnningest Program in major college football. It had a winning percentage of over .800 in the 50's.

Like Hunk Anderson, Terry Brennan was a good man, was put in over his head, while at the same time ND once again cut scholarships while opponents were adding them. When Brennan didn't hit expectations another former player was brought in and handcuffed. Kuharich had talent but not enough bodies.

Ara initially said no to Father Hesburgh. A couple of days after the interview, Hesburgh who had sacked Leaky, hired Brennan and Kuharich, made the "adjustments" Ara said were needed for the program to succeed. They continued with Devine but after he retired once again UND decided that a proven college head coach wasn't necessary. A great HS coach would suffice. Faust and his assistants recruited well but that success wasn't matched on the field. Once again it was shown that ND is not the place for OJT.

This brings us to Davie, Willingham, Weis, and Kelly and a UND Adminsitration that hasn't learned that those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it. Over and over again.

For ND to be successful with the big dogs, ND needs a great coach and great recruiting classes year after year. Without the JUCO plugin factor to replace the career ending injuries, academic and student life casualties, ND has to replace 20 year olds with 17 and 18 year olds. ND had to succeed every year in recruiting and every couple of years when hiring coaching staffs.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,083
Not that I want to join in with the Nancies because this isn't the end of the world... yet.

But I've been saying it for 2 years... ND does not prospect, target nor court at a sufficient level in the recruiting process.

It is simply the sales process.


2018 Offers:

Michigan ..... 155
Bama .......... 115
Nebraska .... 107
Penn St ....... 102
Ohio St ........ 101
ND ............... 74

SC has just 68*.

Don't disagree with any of what you stated, but I wonder if the number of low offers is due to a lot of those kids not being even remotely close to having decent grades and test scores?
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Sherm your first two sentences point out it recruiting is a University problem because the last four coaches had no success. Then you kind of rip those 4 coaches recruiting prowess.
So which is it the coaches or UND?

Other coaches have recruited well and coached well. ND had a location/education disadvantage competing with the football factories then too.

Davie had deep ties to Texas schools from his A&M days and used it recruiting for Holtz and himself. Davie also took to ND into FL and the southlands. By '97 half the roster was from south of the Mason Dixon Line. I wrote an article for the Irish Recruiting Journal on the shift in ND's recruiting base. Davie also made ND brought ND camp's up to major college standards. This had the added benefit of exposing recruits to the ND environment including academics. Regardless of his recruiting abilities, his assistants left much to be desired on the recruiting trail and on the field, Colletto, Rodgers, et al. And after Holtz's confrontations with ND Admissions, with and without Cerrato, Davie made no waves to Admissions. Offers weren't official until Admission gave their Nihil Obstat. Dave deferred. Where Holtz/Cerrato had scraped, finessed, bamboozled, or 11th hour time played Admissions, Davie rolled over understanding Malloy and croonies were backing Admissions to the hilt. Keep in mind that in those days ND required 16 core course hours while the NCAA only required 12. Most kids didn't take the courses ND required. And were told if they wanted to come to ND they had to load up their Senior year with tough courses at the same time improving GPAs. Highly touted WR David Terrell committed to ND but Admissions wanted Terrell to retake a course and improve the grade Terriell flipped to Michigan and became a star. Davie once again proved that ND is no place for OJT, on or off the field.

Willingham had success at Stanford but his lack of recruiting interest at ND was probably the worst in ND history. He did get some questionable recruits in, one had a 800 SAT, excelled on the field and graduated on time. Willingham truly ran the program into the ground, leaving his successor with huge wholes in the OLine and other places. After ruining ND, Willingham went to UW and ruined that program.

Weis never should have been hired. See the OJT comment above. Nobly Weis stayed the course with his then current employers through the Super Bowl. Unfamiliar with recruiting egos he withdrew an offer to a recruit who was upset because Weis couldn't make a home visit because of time conflicts with New England. Foolishly UND let the Patriots come before the Irish. Weis's NFL demeanor did work with a lot of recruits and players. He also made gaffs like Davie did hiring assistants (and we can add Kelly and Willingham to that list). Had Cutcliffe not had a heart attack requiring his withdrawal as a coach things might have been better for Weis but he still made fundamental management and coaching mistakes. Without JUCO's to plug into Willingham's lack of OL recruitment, Weis had to swing at the fences for the top OLs, the one he got was forced to start as a freshman and didn't receive the weight room development nor technique that a redshirt year would have provided. He never reached the expectations set for him. Weis did make a number of inroads with the ND Administration among them as an alumni he understood ND's academic emphasis. Where Holtz had fought Rooney and Admissions, and Davie and Willingham had rolled over in deference, Weis approached Saracino (Rooney's successor) to get an understanding of what ND Admissions looked for in a recruit's transcript, core courses, and character. Weis in turn educated his assistants in Admissions way and instructed them to seek out underclassman and instill in them, their coaches, etc what the recruit needed to do as a sophomore, junior, and first semester senior to enable Admissions to give their OK. No need to rehash Schematic Advantage nor Weis's lack of success in subsequent college coaching gigs.

Kelly did well coaching at several places with the lower rated players those schools and their opponents usually got. Two of the big questions with him when he came to ND was could he recruit nationally and could he compete on the field with the big dawg schools and coaches. I believe he's done better than his 3 predecessors but still made the similar management errors in hiring staff. Where Weis hired people he had never worked with Kelly insisted on bringing his small fish staff from his small fish previous employer. Assistant who like Weis's were a mixed bag in recruiting. It requires all the staff not just some of them. Kelly also exhibited an arrogance similar to Weis in doing the same thing over and over despite it not working time after time. "Get used to it." Kelly did get a training table at ND something Malloy and his predecessors had fought for against generations of ND coaches.

Three of these coaches never should have been hired. The fourth was on the cusp of the winning percentage of the great ND coaches ... till the Frozen Five, ND's retroactive ineligibility, the last drive with MJ and a gun ... none of which were the coaching staff's responsiblity. ND has Du lac, Res Life, and places accountability in the student. But expect the coaching staff to win with reduced numbers and replace them with freshman ... and still win.

Who hired these coaches? Not the location in Indiana. Not the weather, diversity, parietals, small dorms, tough academic requirements and lack of cake courses an degrees. The UND Adminstration is the common denominator.

UND has a similar history for more than 80 years. Rockne's death was sad, yet a relief to the ND Administration. He ran the show and they resented that in spades. They didn't replace him with another successful coach. They threw in a former player with coaching experience but chopped the number of scholarships. When Leahy won 4 National Championship working inhuman hours and his health was compromised he asked for a year's leave of absence to recover. The new ND president didn't care for football once again being bigger than the University. So the president who would be know for his championing civil rights, promoted the Freshman Coach to Head Coach. He was an All-American RB for ND so that obviously qualified him to win at the Winnningest Program in major college football. It had a winning percentage of over .800 in the 50's.

Like Hunk Anderson, Terry Brennan was a good man, was put in over his head, while at the same time ND once again cut scholarships while opponents were adding them. When Brennan didn't hit expectations another former player was brought in and handcuffed. Kuharich had talent but not enough bodies.

Ara initially said no to Father Hesburgh. A couple of days after the interview, Hesburgh who had sacked Leaky, hired Brennan and Kuharich, made the "adjustments" Ara said were needed for the program to succeed. They continued with Devine but after he retired once again UND decided that a proven college head coach wasn't necessary. A great HS coach would suffice. Faust and his assistants recruited well but that success wasn't matched on the field. Once again it was shown that ND is not the place for OJT.

This brings us to Davie, Willingham, Weis, and Kelly and a UND Adminsitration that hasn't learned that those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it. Over and over again.

For ND to be successful with the big dogs, ND needs a great coach and great recruiting classes year after year. Without the JUCO plugin factor to replace the career ending injuries, academic and student life casualties, ND has to replace 20 year olds with 17 and 18 year olds. ND had to succeed every year in recruiting and every couple of years when hiring coaching staffs.

This post is the word! I am glad to have been able to read it.

People don't realize that Terry Brennan was just out of ND, so to speak when he was hired to be head coach, what was he, all of 24 or 25?!?!?! And, if anyone has any questions that administration overtly tried to throttle back football by curtailing its success, Brennan, in the days of nearly unlimited scholarships, (think 120 for some of the bigger schools,) was given such measly scholarship support that he had a significant number of players (starters and second team) that weren't even on scholarship, and his total scholarship allotment was just about what some other schools offered for a single year!

Brennan could have been one of the greats. But he had less than support. On purpose. I know because I have a friend that was the last assistant Terry hired, on December 19th. Terry was fired on Christmas! (or Christmas eve.)

That is why I believe there are real plans in the works to untangle the Football operations from the University administration. The future model will be more of a self-funded, independent business operation, operating distinctly separate under the university's charter.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Don't disagree with any of what you stated, but I wonder if the number of low offers is due to a lot of those kids not being even remotely close to having decent grades and test scores?

To test that take Stanford, and the rest of the top ten academic institutions in CFB, look at their admissions standards for football players versus non-athlete students, and see the number of offers they put out.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,083
I can remember when Bob "Don't call me Bobby" Knight started getting pissed at anyone who called him Bobby. Hard to change after so many years of Bobby. Mr. Rees will always be Tommy in our minds and in our hearts.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,128
Reaction score
11,077
BGIF's post and highlights about BK's refusal to change things that are broke because "deal with it" makes me wonder:

How much responsibility does Jack share for the short-comings of the program since 2012?

I know there has to be a give-and-take, because you can't ask your HC to fire his new DC after just one season, and you can't ask him to fire his DC after just two seasons, when that second season was plagued by the worst injury luck in the history of college defenses.

But at the same time, if your head coach is consistently making personnel and game-management errors on a year-to-year basis, at what point can the AD step in without making the HC feel like he's under attack?

Should Jack have acted sooner in his *management* of the program, which is supposedly the norm behind the scenes now?

I truly don't know. If he starts to put the pressure on BK after '14, the argument could be made that he would be over-stepping, as we're just two years removed from a natty appearance and coming off of two seasons where the team was dealing with freak occurrences that hurt the roster.

If he starts to put the pressure on after '15, it almost wouldn't have made sense, considering the overall success of the team... but as GK shouted until he was blue in the face while the rest of us wouldn't listen, there were still big issues waiting just under the surface that could appear at any moment if things didn't work out perfectly in '16... and they didn't.

So Jack probably should have acted BEFORE the '16 season in terms of, at the very least, forcing BK's hand on the BVG thing. Probably could have forced his hand on the playcalling, and the Special Teams/TE coach as well, if we're being really picky.

But at the same time, I think it's perfectly reasonably that he (hopefully begrudgingly) allowed BK to stay the course coming off the '15 season. Anybody could have believed that wild success was possible in '16 if some breaks went the right way and some player-personnel decisions happened differently/worked out better.

What's a Savvy Jack to do?
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
Realistically can't you say Davie, Willingham, Weis and Kelly have all been a failure on the trail. Doesn't that indicate the problem is not with the coaches, but with the University and program as a whole. Or more accurate is the landscape of college football and how Notre Dame will never be able to recruit with the big boys. We all know Notre Dame has the academic restrictions. And unlike even a Stanford Notre Dame's home state doesn't produce talent, Stanford has Cali. Notre Dame is not in Cali, Florida, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Louisiana, North Carolina, etc. Not to mention the weather is South Bend, Indiana sucks during the winter. Drastically different than Palo

Weis recruited well. But left many holes on defense, especially defensive line and holes in the offensive line. He also shot for the stars and missed way to many times. He was never able to add the depth due to this.

Weis was actually great. His problem was everything else that came with being a head coach in college football. He actually had lots of talent on defense, he just didn't know how to develop it and had a bad staff in place.

With regards to Stanford, the majority of their roster is not Cali players and NorCal has pretty mediocre talent concentration. ND has a lot of talent in the Midwest to pull from... it's extremely underrated how much talent there is on a yearly basis from Chicago/Indiana but Notre Dame does a very poor job of recruiting this talent... and was totally MIA in recruiting Ohio/Michigan this cycle. People every year make excuses about why Notre Dame "can't" recruit but an incompetent coach like Weis who simply tried hard showed it can be done. Kelly's problem is that he and his staff basically haven't worked hard for the past 5 years.
 

NDinBoston

Active member
Messages
939
Reaction score
55
Weis was actually great. His problem was everything else that came with being a head coach in college football. He actually had lots of talent on defense, he just didn't know how to develop it and had a bad staff in place.

With regards to Stanford, the majority of their roster is not Cali players and NorCal has pretty mediocre talent concentration. ND has a lot of talent in the Midwest to pull from... it's extremely underrated how much talent there is on a yearly basis from Chicago/Indiana but Notre Dame does a very poor job of recruiting this talent... and was totally MIA in recruiting Ohio/Michigan this cycle. People every year make excuses about why Notre Dame "can't" recruit but an incompetent coach like Weis who simply tried hard showed it can be done. Kelly's problem is that he and his staff basically haven't worked hard for the past 5 years.

This is fascinating so I have a question. NDC listed offer counts and showed that ND is well below the top schools and gave examples of things they have to do better. Then you look at Stanford and they are at or below ND's offer rate and finish below ND in recruiting rankings anyway. What are the main things driving their better success on the field?
 

NDShark

Well-known member
Messages
1,343
Reaction score
563
EDIT: I got it

On The Job training/experience I assumed.

BGIF -- Thank you for the history lesson. Amazing to hear the ways in which we've shot ourselves in the feet for the past 70 years.

Bogs -- Thank you for the information about what's ahead. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy. Even if you're selling snake oil, I'm buying, because it's a whole lot better than believing we'd continue some of the same antics BGIF wrote about for the next few decades.

Reps for all! Although I'm maxed out on my Bogs account.
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,329
Reaction score
13,092
Weis was actually great. His problem was everything else that came with being a head coach in college football. He actually had lots of talent on defense, he just didn't know how to develop it and had a bad staff in place.

With regards to Stanford, the majority of their roster is not Cali players and NorCal has pretty mediocre talent concentration. ND has a lot of talent in the Midwest to pull from... it's extremely nderrated how much talent there is on a yearly basis from Chicago/Indiana but Notre Dame does a very poor job of recruiting this talent... and was totally MIA in recruiting Ohio/Michigan this cycle. People every year make excuses about why Notre Dame "can't" recruit but an incompetent coach like Weis who simply tried hard showed it can be done. Kelly's problem is that he and his staff basically haven't worked hard for the past 5 years.

Was funny because the cycle where Kelly, Diaco and co. went after Tuitt, Lynch and Ishaq made people think wow this is how it's going to be going forward, just relentless hustle on the recruiting trail. They never repeated this level of effort since really.
 

Meatloaf

Well-known member
Messages
2,058
Reaction score
951
Was funny because the cycle where Kelly, Diaco and co. went after Tuitt, Lynch and Ishaq made people think wow this is how it's going to be going forward, just relentless hustle on the recruiting trail. They never repeated this level of effort since really.

This is what pisses me of the most about Kelly and our staff in regards to crootin. They can be tenacious and out work teams for top 50 players, they just choose not to. Every once in a while you see a good effort like DRob, but it's nowhere near as consistent as it should be.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,401
On The Job training/experience I assumed.

BGIF -- Thank you for the history lesson. Amazing to hear the ways in which we've shot ourselves in the feet for the past 70 years.

Bogs -- Thank you for the information about what's ahead. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy. Even if you're selling snake oil, I'm buying, because it's a whole lot better than believing we'd continue some of the same antics BGIF wrote about for the next few decades.

Reps for all! Although I'm maxed out on my Bogs account.

I'm so confused...you're Bogs?
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,083
Weis was actually great. His problem was everything else that came with being a head coach in college football. He actually had lots of talent on defense, he just didn't know how to develop it and had a bad staff in place.

With regards to Stanford, the majority of their roster is not Cali players and NorCal has pretty mediocre talent concentration. ND has a lot of talent in the Midwest to pull from... it's extremely underrated how much talent there is on a yearly basis from Chicago/Indiana but Notre Dame does a very poor job of recruiting this talent... and was totally MIA in recruiting Ohio/Michigan this cycle. People every year make excuses about why Notre Dame "can't" recruit but an incompetent coach like Weis who simply tried hard showed it can be done. Kelly's problem is that he and his staff basically haven't worked hard for the past 5 years.

One of Charlie's problems was his coaching staff and him either not knowing how to handle the fighting or simply hoping it would resolve itself, which goes back to OJT.
 

Armyirish47

Well-known member
Messages
1,440
Reaction score
1,085
Great recent posts in this thread. I would also like to add that frequently I lose sight of just how hard it is to win a national championship, let alone do it repeatedly. In the Age of Saban and Meyer it seems like it shouldn't be that difficult of a proposition at the right school, but it takes not just talented coaching, tireless recruiting, etc. but a healthy dose of good ole fashioned luck. Take some other title droughts at various competitive schools for instance:

Michigan (spit): won in '48, not again until '97, and not since

Ohio State: 1970 - 2002 (and didn't win last year despite having arguably the most talented NFL draft class EVAR! Ezekiel Elliott, Michael Thomas, Joey Bosa of Ohio State Buckeyes could be part of the best rookie class ever from one college - NFL 2016)

Texas: 1970 - 2005

Texas A&M: 1939 - crickets

Clemson: 1981 - 2016

Alabama: 1992 - arrival of "The One"

USC: 1978 - 2003

UCLA: 1954 - LOL

Stanford: 1926 - LOLOL

Penn State: 1982, 1986, gross

Georgia: 1942 - 1980 - present

Northwestern: Still reading?

None of this excuses last season, or Kelly's or any other coaches failures and shortcomings. The goal obviously is not just to win a championship but be relatively awesome year in and year out. BUT, it does give me a little bit of perspective though, and gets me excited about next year with the coaching changes because Kelly will either win big (hurrah!) or go home (just wait till the NEXT year!).
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
Was funny because the cycle where Kelly, Diaco and co. went after Tuitt, Lynch and Ishaq made people think wow this is how it's going to be going forward, just relentless hustle on the recruiting trail. They never repeated this level of effort since really.

So much for Kelly having that "fire in the belly". Kelly going conservative and "lazy" at ND is one of the most surprising things of his tenure (to me anyway).
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,083
So much for Kelly having that "fire in the belly". Kelly going conservative and "lazy" at ND is one of the most surprising things of his tenure (to me anyway).

Kind of like when NBA & NFL players finally land that big contract and they don't continue to raise their level of play. Kelly gets that extension and goes on cruise control.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
ISD has a great article by Nick Dubose. Analyze This. I don't mean to shortchange it by talking about just one slice it makes, but read it.

It points out Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio States recent success as how well these staffs have used non coaching assistants or analysts.

Bama has 16 very highly qualified assistants that to statistical analysis at one time, and break down high school tape to scout recruits at another. Read more about the rest of what they do.

Clemson has a dozen, OSU ten, but ND has 7 and three or four are intern positions, so they don't even have the experience to do what the other three schools have their analysts do!

You can talk about standards, having assistants as recruiting superstars, etc. But as I am learning, to win at college football today, you need to have a large staff, (larger than ND's), filled with very capable, well trained individuals, (also above ND's standards).

Wouldn't it be interesting if ND built the behind the scenes staff, right, and started winning and began a climb back to the big-time?
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
ISD has a great article by Nick Dubose. Analyze This. I don't mean to shortchange it by talking about just one slice it makes, but read it.

It points out Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio States recent success as how well these staffs have used non coaching assistants or analysts.

Bama has 16 very highly qualified assistants that to statistical analysis at one time, and break down high school tape to scout recruits at another. Read more about the rest of what they do.

Clemson has a dozen, OSU ten, but ND has 7 and three or four are intern positions, so they don't even have the experience to do what the other three schools have their analysts do!

You can talk about standards, having assistants as recruiting superstars, etc. But as I am learning, to win at college football today, you need to have a large staff, (larger than ND's), filled with very capable, well trained individuals, (also above ND's standards).

Wouldn't it be interesting if ND built the behind the scenes staff, right, and started winning and began a climb back to the big-time?


kirk herbsteit even mentioned this at the championship game ....take a look at what michigan is doing now...3 freaking assistants on staff each make 1mill or more...we are sooooo damn behind
 

NDinBoston

Active member
Messages
939
Reaction score
55
ISD has a great article by Nick Dubose. Analyze This. I don't mean to shortchange it by talking about just one slice it makes, but read it.

It points out Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio States recent success as how well these staffs have used non coaching assistants or analysts.

Bama has 16 very highly qualified assistants that to statistical analysis at one time, and break down high school tape to scout recruits at another. Read more about the rest of what they do.

Clemson has a dozen, OSU ten, but ND has 7 and three or four are intern positions, so they don't even have the experience to do what the other three schools have their analysts do!

You can talk about standards, having assistants as recruiting superstars, etc. But as I am learning, to win at college football today, you need to have a large staff, (larger than ND's), filled with very capable, well trained individuals, (also above ND's standards).

Wouldn't it be interesting if ND built the behind the scenes staff, right, and started winning and began a climb back to the big-time?

Thanks Bogs. I posted something similar recently. Not to make excuses for millionaire coaches but it's a big time business and ND should invest in it like that. Again, thanks for continuing to bring interesting stuff that helps piece it all together. Reps
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
Does ND choose to get outspent by the other schools, or are they ignorant to what other schools are doing? It is somewhat embarrassing that all of the other blue bloods take their programs so much more seriously.

The program needs an overhaul. Commit the resources to give the program a chance to be successful. Hire more, better staff. Pay the bigger, better staff what the market dictates. Buy more, better things for training and marketing. Recruit more, better kids. Compete damnit! Stop mailing it in.
 

OCIrish

Fukk Michigan
Messages
3,280
Reaction score
218
ISD has a great article by Nick Dubose. Analyze This. I don't mean to shortchange it by talking about just one slice it makes, but read it.

It points out Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio States recent success as how well these staffs have used non coaching assistants or analysts.

Bama has 16 very highly qualified assistants that to statistical analysis at one time, and break down high school tape to scout recruits at another. Read more about the rest of what they do.

Clemson has a dozen, OSU ten, but ND has 7 and three or four are intern positions, so they don't even have the experience to do what the other three schools have their analysts do!

You can talk about standards, having assistants as recruiting superstars, etc. But as I am learning, to win at college football today, you need to have a large staff, (larger than ND's), filled with very capable, well trained individuals, (also above ND's standards).

Wouldn't it be interesting if ND built the behind the scenes staff, right, and started winning and began a climb back to the big-time?

Bogs, thanks for sharing!! This is great stuff, which, brings me to a point, somewhat in one of my rants back in December. I think BGIF alluded, in another thread a brief summary of coaches hired throughout ND's history. History has proven time and again that the administration DOES NOT want the football team to be bigger than the institution itself. I feel this is one reason why they are always behind the 8 ball if you will in terms of playing catch up to other programs. I don't see ND being an innovator in college football, therefore they're constantly having to play catch up with the blue bloods. If it's not one one thing with the program, it's been another. I could be off base, but the feeling I get, is that the administration had NO qualms about keeping the football program behind the elite.......as long as the stadium is filled for home games, why should they care?? Kind of reminds me of being a Cubs fan. As long as Wrigley was packed, ownership didn't care what kind of product they put on the field.
 

Valpodoc85

Well-known member
Messages
1,719
Reaction score
466
There is a linear relationship in NCAA sports between games won and money spent. Perhaps we're not spending as much as OSU and Alabama. Perhaps Swarbrick knows this and feels he's getting his money's worth from BK.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
kirk herbsteit even mentioned this at the championship game ....take a look at what michigan is doing now...3 freaking assistants on staff each make 1mill or more...we are sooooo damn behind

Yes, Michigan got to a point similar to where we are now under Kelly and looked down the road at OSU and said "we need to do everything in our power to compete with that."

They went out and spent ungodly amounts on Harbaugh, and then gave him blank checks for support staff. They're letting him do literally anything he wants and he thinks will help win.

Clemson, similarly, saw the rise of the SEC and Oregon and said "only way we win is to spend money"... they got Morris and Venables for more $$ than anyone was paying at the time. Their facilities are going to be bonkers once complete. That's what winners do.

The fact that ND is spending hundreds of millions to add classrooms to a football stadium tells you the priorities aren't even close to being what they should be to compete with the elite. The money spent on Elko tells me they're sort of waking up though and just trying to make sure the next coach is the best one they can possibly get instead of settling for an available option like Rhule this past cycle.
 
Top