Sherm Sticky
The Prophet
- Messages
- 19,321
- Reaction score
- 1,638
'17 IN WR Mac Hippenhammer (Penn State Verbal)
'17 IN WR Mac Hippenhammer (Penn State Verbal)
Realistically can't you say Davie, Willingham, Weis and Kelly have all been a failure on the trail. Doesn't that indicate the problem is not with the coaches, but with the University and program as a whole. Or more accurate is the landscape of college football and how Notre Dame will never be able to recruit with the big boys. We all know Notre Dame has the academic restrictions. And unlike even a Stanford Notre Dame's home state doesn't produce talent, Stanford has Cali. Notre Dame is not in Cali, Florida, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Louisiana, North Carolina, etc. Not to mention the weather is South Bend, Indiana sucks during the winter. Drastically different than Palo Alto.
Davie was able to recruit decent classes, but his teams lacked speed and try difference makers.
Don't even need to say anything about Willingham's lack of recruiting effort.
Weis recruited well. But left many holes on defense, especially defensive line and holes in the offensive line. He also shot for the stars and missed way to many times. He was never able to add the depth due to this.
And Kelly's recruiting failures have been well documented in this site.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
'17 IN WR Mac Hippenhammer (Penn State Verbal)
Yup. I've been a huge critic of our recruiting philosophy for years and I think the proof is in the pudding. You're better offer taking lots of guys that really want to be here early in the cycle and then figuring out the other pieces later. There is always room for big fish. It makes no sense to approach guys like Hippenhammer how we did, much less Oliver Martin who was a true stud recruit. And we do this crap every year, while chasing a bunch of Cali players that will inevitably fail at ND like 90% of them do.
Guys who really want to be here almost always outperform their ranking. Onwualu and Love are recent examples. Schmidt when he was healthy for that one half a year played way above a no-star PWO level. Eifert. Both Martins. You can make a list of the most productive players to come through ND and very few of them were "recruiting wars" from the southeast or west coast to convince them to come here. Guys like Tuitt are an exception.
Four straight years of classes full of depth holes and ranked outside the top 10. Obviously, we need a guy that will recruit a different way than Kelly has. He has been a failure on the trail.
Realistically can't you say Davie, Willingham, Weis and Kelly have all been a failure on the trail. Doesn't that indicate the problem is not with the coaches, but with the University and program as a whole. Or more accurate is the landscape of college football and how Notre Dame will never be able to recruit with the big boys. We all know Notre Dame has the academic restrictions. And unlike even a Stanford Notre Dame's home state doesn't produce talent, Stanford has Cali. Notre Dame is not in Cali, Florida, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Louisiana, North Carolina, etc. Not to mention the weather is South Bend, Indiana sucks during the winter. Drastically different than Palo Alto.
Davie was able to recruit decent classes, but his teams lacked speed and try difference makers.
Don't even need to say anything about Willingham's lack of recruiting effort.
Weis recruited well. But left many holes on defense, especially defensive line and holes in the offensive line. He also shot for the stars and missed way to many times. He was never able to add the depth due to this.
And Kelly's recruiting failures have been well documented in this site.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk