- Messages
- 37,544
- Reaction score
- 28,990
For all the talk Sam Presti got about being a genius, I think a lot of it is unwarranted. True, he drafted Durant, Westbrook, Ibaka, Harden, Maynor, and Jackson, but he also hired a bad head coach and none of those players actually fit together. They were more like an all-star roster than a true, cohesive team. Durant, Westbrook, and Harden HAD to have the ball to be effective (less so with Durant, but he still needed it to dominate, especially in his early years). None of them were particularly great outside shooters (Durant was best, but not an automatic guy from distance or anything like that) either. Perkins was literally a non-factor offensively, a liability. Ibaka was pretty good from 10-15 feet, but couldn't post up. Thabo was the only guy that really filled a role-- 3 and D. I guess Fisher did as well during his time there, but really brought nothing from an offensive standpoint. Collison gave good energy and hustle, but was only an adequate rebounder and offered almost nothing offensively. I guess my point is that despite having all the talent in the world, those players never really fit together, offensively. They didn't and couldn't compliment each other. Durant was the alpha player, but he didn't have the alpha personality. All the talk of him being "soft" didn't come from nowhere. Westbrook had the alpha personality, but wasn't the alpha player. I can see why both Durant and RW have both had the years they have had this year.
I believe you're right in pointing out that OKC does seem to be more building a complimentary team today. In those days, I think they were doomed from the get-go though. I blame the make-up and chemistry of the team (management), as well as the cap/economic situation/OKC market of the time, to a lesser degree, for the Thunder's failures. Not Westbrook.
Yes, and they did the correct thing trading Harden because he would've walked otherwise. Where they made a mistake, IMO, is with what they got back for him. The picks were nice, the players were not. And what they got from the picks wasn't good enough, because they ended up being lower picks in two drafts that stunk... only one guy from either draft has made an All-Star team. So in retrospect, they would've probably been better off trading Harden directly for a better complimentary player... realistically, they probably could've gotten DeAndre Jordan + picks. They used both their picks hunting for a big man and neither guy they got is as good as Jordan.
The fact that they traded Harden so that they'd have the cap room to sign Ibaka made sense, but then trading Ibaka for Oladipo is kind of waving the white flag and going "crap, we really miss having a competent guard alongside Westbrook because Lamb didn't work out."
The Kobe comparison might not have been a good one because Westbrook didn't intentionally sabotage the team. I made it more because I think he's a similar kind of personality and is heading a team now that reminds me of post-Shaq Lakers in how it needs to be built to win a championship. It shocks me that they didn't make a play for Cousins given how little he went for to New Orleans, and it shocks me that they haven't found a way to get a defense-first small forward that is a catch-and-shoot guy. Even a Kelly Oubre type who is a role player for Washington would do wonders for them.
