BleedBlueGold
Well-known member
- Messages
- 6,265
- Reaction score
- 2,489
Wife came at me with missiles last night when I brought up cutting the cord. She sure does love overpaying for cable. Anyone's best guess as to why.
Wife came at me with missiles last night when I brought up cutting the cord. She sure does love overpaying for cable. Anyone's best guess as to why.
Wife came at me with missiles last night when I brought up cutting the cord. She sure does love overpaying for cable. Anyone's best guess as to why.
My wife: "I don't know shit about technology. I'll trust your judgement."
And the Heavens opened up, and a golden light shone down upon him, and the angels sang their melodic offerings to a most surprising and just God.
So I call Comcast to do the dance. They pass me to the customer retention center. I tell them I need to reduce my monthly bill considerably. she turns around and offers me the exact same package at the same price I'm currently paying. I say, "I'm sorry, I must not have been clear. I need to reduce my monthly bill considerably." she replies, "Oh no, you were very clear." She then offers me a different package that saves $10. I tell her to put in a disconnect for April 2. She doesn't even say, I'm sorry we're going to lose you.
DTV on 4 TVs - no premium shit but whole home DVR, 3 wireless phones with 20GB shared data monthly and 300MB home internet totaling about $300/month via ATT/DTV. I'm not necessarily happy with the price but relative to discretionary expenses in my life this has high utility and value.
Sports streaming drives me nuts - Perfect example yesterday, CBS Sports app not working at the office Roku so I had to run home to watch ND. Plus WatchESPN app has been shit for two weeks with some sign in problem since I combined my wireless bill with DTV.
I need DVR like crack with kids and wife pretty much making live sports viewing impossible otherwise, plus time saved fast forwarding through halftime and commercials is a godsend. Flipping channels on streaming shit is beyond annoying - I don't know how you people tolerate it.
My wife: "I don't know shit about technology. I'll trust your judgement."
And the Heavens opened up, and a golden light shone down upon him, and the angels sang their melodic offerings to a most surprising and just God.
Rookie. You dead son. You done fucked up A Aron.
Well, I just got off the phone with AT&T.
$80 for DirecTV and internet. They bring DirecTV in over fiber so I don't have to worry about a dish. Includes four DVR's and their own streaming device so I don't need Hulu, Firestick, etc.. The $80 is all inclusive, except for state tax. No equipment fees, regulatory fees, regional sports fees, etc.
$100 Visa gift card included. I'll save about $70 a month.
It depends on your living condition. If you live in a house, then yes more than likely you can have all TV's connected to one antenna. More than likely all of the cables in your house come together into one common point. In the south that is often the attic. If that's the case all you need to do is install an attic antenna, and connect that to a splicer that feeds all the TV's you want to hook up. Depending on the size of your home you may need to buy an amplifier to push to the signal to the farthest rooms, but other than that you should be good to go. Once all your rooms are "live" all you'll need is a cable connecting from the wall outlet to the back of your TV.
Well, I just got off the phone with AT&T.
$80 for DirecTV and internet. They bring DirecTV in over fiber so I don't have to worry about a dish. Includes four DVR's and their own streaming device so I don't need Hulu, Firestick, etc.. The $80 is all inclusive, except for state tax. No equipment fees, regulatory fees, regional sports fees, etc.
$100 Visa gift card included. I'll save about $70 a month.
TWC said they were sending us a $300 gift card when we renegotiated one of our deals. All we had to do was stay with them for 3 months and they would send it out. At 4 or 5 months we call and obviously they had no knowledge of this deal. I said, "don't you record all of your phone calls. Let's look it up". That didn't happen. Lying sacks of s*%@. Proceeded to cancel cable by bringing in all of our items to the store where they magically reduced our rate significantly.
Dammit. I just left the ATT store for a cell phone order and they mentioned Dish. But where my house sits I can't get the signal thru the trees. At no point in time did they mention it's possible to get thru a line.Well, I just got off the phone with AT&T.
$80 for DirecTV and internet. They bring DirecTV in over fiber so I don't have to worry about a dish. Includes four DVR's and their own streaming device so I don't need Hulu, Firestick, etc.. The $80 is all inclusive, except for state tax. No equipment fees, regulatory fees, regional sports fees, etc.
$100 Visa gift card included. I'll save about $70 a month.
I have no idea how some of you guys can afford a mortgage on top of some of those expenses. I must be really poor
Dammit. I just left the ATT store for a cell phone order and they mentioned Dish. But where my house sits I can't get the signal thru the trees. At no point in time did they mention it's possible to get thru a line.
$100 - $200 would change whether you could pay your mortgage?
$100 - $200 would change whether you could pay your mortgage?
Oh I never noticed this (probably because it was St Patrick's Day), and no it wouldn't. I just imagined there were more expenses as well that I'm not aware of. I actually live fairly frugally, minus the beer and even that is cheaper than y'all would expect, and do a good job saving. But there's no way in hell I'd feel comfortable spending hundreds of dollars per month on cable.
Well guess what? The MF'er who placed the order lied to me. Not only about the TV, but about the internet speed and I'm still fighting to get my phone number of 30 years ported over. Below is a letter I just sent to the FCC, along with numerous people at Comcast and AT&T. I just got a call from the AT&T Office of the President so I know my letter got through. Seriously thinking about taking both to court.
AT&T has no problem with blatantly lying in order to get the appointment set... at that point, I think they hope that the customer would rather avoid the headache and just pay for a service that isn't what they were promised. They often over-step in promising services in relation to other companies, and also in terms of what they can actually deliver.
I was promised that DirecTV in my new neighborhood would bundle with another company to provide up to 50mb internet, so I set a bundle and an installation appointment. They gave me a solide price point for the whole package, both the satellite AND the internet, which included a breakdown of the other company's bundle price for the internet speeds I wanted.
For reasons out of anyone's control, they couldn't install DirecTV at my new house. They would have needed to mount the dish on a pole in middle of the side yard and run entirely new cables. I wasn't about that, so I said "no thanks." Whatever, shit happens, no biggie.
But then, when the internet guy shows up to hook up my new stuff, he informs me that I can only get 10mb internet. He isn't sure why DirecTV would promise speeds that aren't possible in my neighborhood, but he says that he can install the 10mb internet and I just need to call to adjust my bill. When I call to inquire about my speeds and my adjusted bill, since I won't be bundling DirecTV anymore, they inform me that I would have been paying $50 more for internet than DirecTV promised with their bundle in the first place.
I then proceeded to get the run-around from three different techs and a supervisor, trying to determine why they have a partnership with DirecTV if they can't get on the same page in terms of realistic prices and offerings.
In the end, I left the call with no answers and an overpriced internet package. I think DirecTV had no interest in giving me the ACTUAL price of the internet bundle, and purposely misled me, and I think the other company is cool with it, because they know certain customers will have no other options, and will be locked into the overpriced service in the end either way.
I would write a letter much like your own, but the cable infrastructure that exists in my neighborhood is super poor, and basically everyone can only get up to 10mb internet, and they all get the same bullshit price. It's just that some people go in knowing the price, while others get blindsided if they are promised a "discounted" bundle through another tv provider.
(It also makes no sense to me, because I was told the cable infrastructure wouldn't be upgraded for another three years [when Fioptics gets installed], despite the fact that our neighborhood butts up against a big university, and the university has almost unlimited internet/wifi capability. Perhaps the university is sucking away all the bandwidth that would allow faster speeds in my neighborhood on the existing lines, or else the company just doesn't want to run new lines when their big money-maker is right next door already.)
Over the years, my job has required me to deal with the telcos. They have master plans in place for upgrading the infrastructure. Most of the time the upgrades to support more traffic and bandwidth are determined by the population in the area and the projected revenue. It's possible that the university is using most of the fiber & copper in your area and they can't justify the investment for the rest of the neighborhood. On the other hand, it's quite possible that your neighborhood is being fed from a completely different node than the university.
I've left a message for an attorney to call me, but would be interested to hear opinions from our resident IE staff of lawyers.
That's the truly perplexing part to me. I live in a pretty densely-populated area, considering the presences of the college. But when I asked, the tech said "probably three years before you have fioptics here," and proceeded to explain that they are handling the super rural areas out in the "county" first.
There is a decent population in the southern part of the county, where you go from "Greater Cincinnati" to "farm land" pretty rapidly, but they're so spread out, that I would think the cost of installing the infrastructure wouldn't even be worth securing every household as customers. You would think they'd hit the top three or four population centers first.
But like you said, it's probably a good guess that they don't want to make the additional investment to the city currently because of the university, and the decision is independent of the business that would come from the population.
I have had AT&T for just over 24 months now. I know its been just over 24 months because my introductory 24-month plan has expired and now I am having to pay full price for my services now.
Under the 24-month intro offer, I was paying ~$140....now that the offer has expired, my last bill was $247.
I have found AT&T's equipment to be no less than horrible, in the 25 months since I have had AT&T I have had 5 modems replaced, I am currently on my 6th modem from them(replaced on 4/1/2017). The only thing out of the ordinary I do with my connection is that I host a game server and have for about 4 years now.
My prediction:
I'll call and ask AT&T what they can do to lower my bill, I'm sure they'll tell me that there is nothing that can be done outside of slashing services. At that point I will schedule to get services with another company and no doubt get a 'introductory' offer as a new subscriber there too. When I call AT&T back to cancel my service with them, they will then tell me some new plans they can give me. At which time I will inform them that they can fornicate with themselves.