Legacy - instead of posting a foot of links, answer the Q.. in KC, did 2-3% of jury rolls include illegal immigrants? Same Q on DC....
The answer is yes on both.
The judge in KC is a known lib/activist. And..... She did not challenge the fact that illegals made up 2-3% of jury rolls / registered voters in certain counties.
And you still haven't commented on the dem's publicly saying that the blue wave is made up of documented and undocumented.... please explain exactly what that means?
KC or the state of Kansas? Most of KC is in Missouri.
You do avoid my points and politicizing voting registration - Dems, libs, leftists, etc. However, I made the mistake in responding to you, so let me compound that. The lib/activist federal judge, Julie Robinson, was appointed by George Bush. Kobach was the lead attorney for the state. He had ample opportunity to present his case in court that there was a "substantial number" of non-citizens who had managed to vote in Kansas and that the figures on drivers license registration by non-citizens and his figures "that since 1999, his office had confirmed 127 cases of noncitizens who had either registered to vote or attempted to do so.
Of that number, 43 had succeeded in registering and 11 had voted". He couldn't prove that his assertion that the above numbers were "the tip of the iceberg". In fact, she wrote that “Instead, the Court draws the more obvious conclusion that there is no iceberg; only an icicle, largely created by confusion and administrative error.” and that "there was evidence of a 'small number of noncitizen registrations in Kansas, it is largely explained by administrative error, confusion, or mistake."
From the article you read:
Robinson noted that Kansas is a state with some 1.8 million registered voters — and that the number of people in Kansas who aren't U.S. citizens who either registered to vote or tried to do so is 0.6 percent of the state's noncitizen population.
Based on the evidence, the judge ruled, Kansas' interests in preventing fraud, while legitimate, are "not strong enough to outweigh the tangible and quantifiable burden on eligible voter registration applicants in Kansas who were not registered to vote before January 1, 2013."
The federal judge had found Kobach in contempt of court two month prior and after the trial, sanctioned him, requiring him to complete community service. As noted, Kansas was found to be in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Obviously, that did not prevent him from being appointed to Trump's voting fraud commission which found no evidence of anything remotely close to voter fraud.
Finally, Kansas Motor Vehicle Dept has to offer voting registration to anyone who wishes wit any motor vehicle registration, but they must bring citizenship papers. Many did not have that documentation.
But, Kobach included those numbers in his assertion that 30,000+ people attempted voter fraud because they did not have or did not know they needed that documentation to vote. Seventy percent of those 30,000+ was from the motor vehicle registration papers not available from their visit to renew.
You are clearly on-board with these figures as representing voter fraud and not with the findings of the court that "0.6 percent of the state's noncitizen population" had tried to illegally register to vote or voted. That's of the "noncitizen population".
Read the link or not. But comment on it with some understanding of the facts without pretense.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/61875021/npcmeme.0.jpg)
