- Messages
- 37,544
- Reaction score
- 28,990
Please login |
Interesting take from Mike Frank who says we could go to 22. My main takeaway looking at the numbers is that I'd be very surprised if we didn't aim for 20+, but this is one year where "misses" wouldn't hurt that much as there is a lot of quality 5th year depth you could ask back.
I think LB recruiting will end fine if not great... even without Hilliard. There are an awful lot of guys left on the board that I love. Same thing applies to WR, where we could conceivably end up with a truly stellar class. It begs the question of CJ Sanders and Guyton being takes if it means passing on one or two elite prospects. Especially since if Sanders or Guyton blows up it would mean they're both (relatively) high decommit risks because of where they're from.
I think CB, RB, and QB are the three most dodgy positions. I think these are the ones where if things don't break right you could have big misses that leave catastrophic depth questions.
Interesting take from Mike Frank who says we could go to 22. My main takeaway looking at the numbers is that I'd be very surprised if we didn't aim for 20+, but this is one year where "misses" wouldn't hurt that much as there is a lot of quality 5th year depth you could ask back.
I think LB recruiting will end fine if not great... even without Hilliard. There are an awful lot of guys left on the board that I love. Same thing applies to WR, where we could conceivably end up with a truly stellar class. It begs the question of CJ Sanders and Guyton being takes if it means passing on one or two elite prospects. Especially since if Sanders or Guyton blows up it would mean they're both (relatively) high decommit risks because of where they're from.
I think CB, RB, and QB are the three most dodgy positions. I think these are the ones where if things don't break right you could have big misses that leave catastrophic depth questions.