C
Cackalacky
Guest
Didn't he play FS in high school?
What are they trying to do with him?
I thought the same thing when I first read that but I think HS safety is so much easier than D-1 level.
Didn't he play FS in high school?
What are they trying to do with him?
Didn't he play FS in high school?
What are they trying to do with him?
Too often than not when i watched him though he was engulfed by tackles and never really showed a counter/2nd move once his first move failed. I am not discounting his effort or desire its just he wasn't what i would call a "chess player" when it came to pass rushing.
Quick Defense Recap: Defense Recap | Irish Turning Point
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/F47F5jvr4gw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/FU8rxNjA7x0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Good work.
Lots of talk about pass rush and 3rd down play, but how do you think this team will be against the run on 1st and 2nd down? But my biggest concern isn't getting pressure on the QB, but getting to 3rd and long so they can pressure the QB.
Quick Defense Recap: Defense Recap | Irish Turning Point
Great write up! I would not be surprised to see Rabasa find some serious playing time in this defense. Also Turner is a very interesting case at LB even if it is only 3rd down.
Not been hearing any mention of Moore lately. Was hoping he would step it up his senior season.
I'm a little surprised by the implied negativity toward Diaco. It just seems a little...forced. Like sour grapes-y. (Probably not the right idiom, you know what I mean).
I mean, the 2012 defense was one of the best scoring and red-zone defenses in recent college football history. And suddenly his defenses didn't play as "a unit"? And couldn't get pressure? I get that they want to support the new guy, but c'mon man.
I'm with you on this, Houston.
say what u want abut Diaco, his recruting, style he played, his hair, but on the field, that 2012 D was best in a generation here at ND.
gotta give him that.
This -- 100%
Just like we had a once in a generation defense in 2012, we had a once in a generation linebacker in Manti Teo. Diaco's defense was built on having linemen suck up blocks so that linebackers could make plays. When we didn't have that type of linebacker in 2013, our defense wasn't very good. Diaco may have been a product of Manti Teo and Diaco showed no effort to change his defense in 2013.
Just like we had a once in a generation defense in 2012, we had a once in a generation linebacker in Manti Teo. Diaco's defense was built on having linemen suck up blocks so that linebackers could make plays. When we didn't have that type of linebacker in 2013, our defense wasn't very good. Diaco may have been a product of Manti Teo and Diaco showed no effort to change his defense in 2013.
Romeo's former position almost always required that he avoid contact and create havoc. That's not a luxury he'll have playing on the defensive line. Sure, on passing downs, he'll be able to use a speed rush and avoid contact. But most other downs, he'll have to engage someone that is bigger and stronger. He has the physical tools (shembo did it and he was smaller), he has the staff to teach him technique and I assume he has the strength (staff obviously believes he does). IMO, it's on him. You have to be a special kind of nuts to stare down a 6'6'' 330lb pig lined up across from you and want to fight him for 60 minutes. He's going to have to want contact. Instead of running around the tackle, he needs to blow up his outside shoulder, pin him, drive him and seal the edge. When he blitzes inside gap, he has to rip hard knowing he's going to get smacked by the guard. When he's fighting to keep contain he has to launch those long arms into the tight end's pads, get the crown of his helmet into his chin strap and whip his ass. It's easier said than done.
Defense is built on more than 1 player... 2012 was a great front 7 but an Unknown secondary... Diacos scheme/philosophy fit perfectly with personnel. He deserves a lot of credit, especially since we all praised his body of work post Navy disaster
The reason Stanford has become a Top 10 program is by getting guys like Okwara on the Dline.
But what did he do when the personnel didn't fit? Nothing, except telegraph blitzes all of 2013 that were completely stopped and exploited.
Exactly. Is it just luck or are they doing something we are not?No, the reason Stanford became a top 10 program is stero... I mean... a great strength and condition program coupled with the least injuries in the NCAA.
Exactly. Is it just luck or are they doing something we are not?
You can't do much if you can't run the system. Either you change players or you blend philosophies to make something work.. Since there's no FA we had to blend and wait... 2012 was great, 2013 could've been similar had we suffered minimal injuries along the lines and Backfield
As for telegraphing blitzes, That's aPlayer not knowing when time it up
Quick Defense Recap: Defense Recap | Irish Turning Point
Most coaches are never as good or as bad as they are perceived. It's the players that make the difference. 2012 & 13 were perfect examples. 2012 you had three All American caliber players who were healthy the entire season. 2013 you didn't.
No, the reason Stanford became a top 10 program is stero... I mean... a great strength and condition program coupled with the least injuries in the NCAA.
Have there been actual rumblings about this?