'16 FL WR Kevin Stepherson (Notre Dame Early Enrollee)

Henges24

BUCKETHEAD
Messages
4,807
Reaction score
1,584
Not sure how to interpret the request for a continuance. Could be good or bad.

He's fine. He'll be there for the Blue & Gold game. I'm assuming he has crossed his T's and dotted his I's since he has stayed out of trouble for what we know at least.
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
He's fine. He'll be there for the Blue & Gold game. I'm assuming he has crossed his T's and dotted his I's since he has stayed out of trouble for what we know at least.

If that's the case, then why the continuance? Why wouldn't he just accept the plea deal as originally arranged? It just seems fishy to me to, especially with him seemingly being in the dog house most of the spring. I hope you're right though.
 

Meatloaf

Well-known member
Messages
2,058
Reaction score
951
My interpretation is he was rumored to be in the doghouse because he hadn't met all the terms of his probation, hence why his lawyer also asked for a continuance. I assume that it's ultimately a good thing as it allows him to make sure he's got his shit together. I don't think Kelly would be playing him in the spring game if he weren't confident in his return, either.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,128
Reaction score
11,077
No info, but I bet the extension allows him to complete required community service. It's the only thing that would make sense as to requesting more time and prolonging the process.

That, or a final drug test is needed, and a few weeks might help in that regard *for whatever reason*
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
No info, but I bet the extension allows him to complete required community service. It's the only thing that would make sense as to requesting more time and prolonging the process.

That, or a final drug test is needed, and a few weeks might help in that regard *for whatever reason*

WVXq0tP.gif
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
No info, but I bet the extension allows him to complete required community service. It's the only thing that would make sense as to requesting more time and prolonging the process.

That, or a final drug test is needed, and a few weeks might help in that regard *for whatever reason*

These are good guesses.
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
No info, but I bet the extension allows him to complete required community service. It's the only thing that would make sense as to requesting more time and prolonging the process.

That, or a final drug test is needed, and a few weeks might help in that regard *for whatever reason*

I mean it is a holiday! gives him a few weeks after to make sure hes good to go.
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,335
Reaction score
13,096
its possible he could not complete 100% his community service hours due to school and football commitments?
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,620
Reaction score
20,108
its possible he could not complete 100% his community service hours due to school and football commitments?

Except a judge wouldn't look at football as a priority over community service.
 

Irish8248

Well-known member
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
880
Happens very frequently... I just delayed a sentencing so my client could do a community service project which would look favorably to the Court during sentencing.
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,335
Reaction score
13,096
Except a judge wouldn't look at football as a priority over community service.

he needs football attendance to stay eligible to stay at ND. It directly effects his education and potential quality of life down the road. i think they'd consider it
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
Defense counsel may have agreed to the continuance request in which case the judge probably would not deny it anyway. Continuances are common and this isn't a big deal. It could have even been Stepherson's attorney that needed the continuance and it would still be worded as defendant's continuance request.
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
I'm not a fan of legalizing marijuana, but the system we have now stinks. No problem in lots of place, jail-able offense in others. Something's gotta give.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,295
I'm not a fan of legalizing marijuana, but the system we have now stinks. No problem in lots of place, jail-able offense in others. Something's gotta give.

I'm with you on weed... and as soon as we make alcohol illegal agian and jail all the CEO's of Big Pharma that flood our streets with America's #2 drug problem behind alcohol, we'll be able to make America great again.

All the italics!
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
5,055
I'm with you on weed... and as soon as we make alcohol illegal agian and jail all the CEO's of Big Pharma that flood our streets with America's #2 drug problem behind alcohol, we'll be able to make America great again.

All the italics!
Criminalize beer and wine? I'm joining the resistance

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 

NDTH91

Well-known member
Messages
1,092
Reaction score
204
So what does this mean for him from a football perspective? Is he clear from an NCAA standpoint? From a University standpoint possession of weed is usually suspension (at least)... did all that get handed down last year?

Interested to hear where others think he stands as of now.
 

Irish2155

Well-known member
Messages
6,452
Reaction score
1,987
It is just weed. Was he flipping big quantity or something, if so that is a different story? Or just smoking like the majority of college students?

The a vast majority of CFB players smoke, just doesn't get caught...the dumb ones get caught, Kevin.
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
I'm with you on weed... and as soon as we make alcohol illegal agian and jail all the CEO's of Big Pharma that flood our streets with America's #2 drug problem behind alcohol, we'll be able to make America great again.

All the italics!

Heck, Pharmaceutical might be our #1 problem at this point.
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
I'm going to play devil's advocate. I agree that there is a lot of indication that we do, in fact, have pharmaceutical and alcohol epidemics already. But we are stuck with pharmaceuticals and alcohol.

- You can further regulate pharmaceuticals, but you ultimately need them for medicine, so they are going to be around.

- Alcohol is linked to a ton of crime, but its such an ingrained part of our culture, that it would be extremely difficult and probably counter-productive to try to make it illegal.

So accepting for argument's sake that "Pot is less harmful than either"--which is probably true from a certain angle, but is often argued too forcefully without really weighing the whole story--why should we legalize it?

We have proven that we can't deal with the drugs we have, and that they cause a lot of BIG issues.

The libertarian argument seems hollow. I agree that generally people should be able to make decisions for themselves and live with the consequences in their own lives. But the fact is the consequences flow very directly to spouses, children, and communities. Drug abuse is not victimless at all.

The strongest argument to me is that it would eliminate organized crime on some level, which may be true, but that is a VERY different argument than arguing that it is harmless. Its basically deciding which harms are more desirable.

So as for me, I think we need a more careful approach that doesn't just take the libertarian, or hedonist, or big-business "pot is fine" argument at face value-- and create a new problem on top of the others we are already struggling with.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,295
I'm going to play devil's advocate. I agree that there is a lot of indication that we do, in fact, have pharmaceutical and alcohol epidemics already. But we are stuck with pharmaceuticals and alcohol.

- You can further regulate pharmaceuticals, but you ultimately need them for medicine, so they are going to be around.

- Alcohol is linked to a ton of crime, but its such an ingrained part of our culture, that it would be extremely difficult and probably counter-productive to try to make it illegal.

So accepting for argument's sake that "Pot is less harmful than either"--which is probably true from a certain angle, but is often argued too forcefully without really weighing the whole story--why should we legalize it?

We have proven that we can't deal with the drugs we have, and that they cause a lot of BIG issues.

The libertarian argument seems hollow. I agree that generally people should be able to make decisions for themselves and live with the consequences in their own lives. But the fact is the consequences flow very directly to spouses, children, and communities. Drug abuse is not victimless at all.

The strongest argument to me is that it would eliminate organized crime on some level, which may be true, but that is a VERY different argument than arguing that it is harmless. Its basically deciding which harms are more desirable.

So as for me, I think we need a more careful approach that doesn't just take the libertarian, or hedonist, or big-business "pot is fine" argument at face value-- and create a new problem on top of the others we are already struggling with.

If the libertarian argument seems hollow then use the American argument that the founding fathers would have used. There are over 1 million people rotting in jails/prisons right now because of weed. Their freedom & rights stripped because people with your view think we just can't handle any more legal drugs. I don't mess with weed personally but how the local, state and the federal government over criminalizes the least harmful drug that the majority of Americans feel should be legal to incarcerate other Americans so they feed the system with fines, court costs, prison beds and civil forfeitures is well, un-American in spirit but SO American in practice.
 
Last edited:

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
My point was that it's not all or nothing, and I also agree that jail is appropriate in many cases.

But it's a complicated issue and we shouldn't just pick a team.
 
Last edited:

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
2,732
If the libertarian argument seems hollow then use the American argument that the founding fathers would have used. There are over 1 million people rotting in jails/prisons right now because of weed. Their freedom & rights stripped because people with your view think we just can't handle any more legal drugs. I don't mess with weed personally but how the local, state and the federal government over criminalizes the least harmful drug that the majority of Americans feel should be legal to incarcerate other Americans so they feed the system with fines, court costs, prison beds and civil forfeitures is well, un-American in spirit but SO American in practice.

This x1000 - I really enjoy that rich people go to rehab for using prescription drugs and poor people go to jail. Or rich people get a good lawyer and sing a community service song and poor people go to jail. I don't want to pay for stoners to be incarcerated or see them forced to a second class life because their criminal record keeps them from getting a decent job or career. It is economically retarded policy that compounds the "problem" instead of helping it.
 
Top