- Messages
- 44,617
- Reaction score
- 20,101
Only sets us up for more disappointment... when he picks UF.
After what's happened in the recent past, I will remain a pessimistic optimist.
Only sets us up for more disappointment... when he picks UF.
No one posted the update from ISD regarding Anzalone?
Penn State seems to have done some negative recruiting that didn't sit well and Christain has heard that Anzalone is referring to ND commits at The Opening as his "teammates at Notre Dame."
Irish Sports Daily Forums
No one posted the update from ISD regarding Anzalone?
Penn State seems to have done some negative recruiting that didn't sit well and Christain has heard that Anzalone is referring to ND commits at The Opening as his "teammates at Notre Dame."
Irish Sports Daily Forums
ALLGATOR you aren't sweating this though right? Isn't UF stacked at LB already this cycle? Or was he going to play offense for you guys?
Okay guys. Back to 3-4 versus 4-3. When recruiting sites talk about inside versus outside, their bias is to a 4-3. An outside 4-3 linebacker could be either an inside, or outside linebacker in a 3-4. .
To be fair I did kind of lead ALLGATOR into minimizing the loss of Anzalone. And I do think we need him more than UF does.
And if we didn't get him, I would TOTALLY be talking about how it doesn't matter because we have Martini and hopefully Garrett in the 2014 class. lol (/dead serious)
I think you guys get him and I hope you do as well. We on the other hand need and want Ebenezer. I said this in one of my first post on this site. I havent changed my opinion.
Question: Is there any shot ND would play him at H back I didnt watch ND play last year?
The amount of positive buzz out there right now for ND is astounding. I want to buy it... sure seems like ND is the bet if you're the betting type...... but I'm pretty nervous still. Would be an absolutely huge pickup.
We need a elite CAT if we do get Anzalone to make this a fantastic LB class. I feel pretty good about Muhammad right now and he would be perfect.
Not trying to clog up AA's thread with more LB debate, but why do few people slate Mattingly for CAT? Seems tall, rangy and quick on film. Plus, he's still got a lot of room to put on strength (lower body at least). I would think Smith-Deeb-Anzalone-Mattingly gives us the ideal set of LBs for our system (barring guys like Foster, Savaiinaea and other guys that are off the board or huge reaches).
wouldn't randolph be considered a cat type as well???
wouldn't randolph be considered a cat type as well???