Riddickulous
"That" Guy
- Messages
- 16,866
- Reaction score
- 8,325
I think it sounds better if you take out Wisconsin.
Wisconsin constantly churns out talented linemen. Why exclude them?
I think it sounds better if you take out Wisconsin.
Wisconsin constantly churns out talented linemen. Why exclude them?
They develop the hell out of their linemen, but they don't get highly touted linemen like the schools above. Big difference.
...
Proof?
Either way.. they win.
I guess I should say that I haven't looked this up, but I'd bet Wisconsin does not get the highly rated o-linemen that Oklahoma and USC get. My point is they get their guys and make them great. They're either underrated or just developed well, but their o-line ratings wise probably does not compare to the above teams.
Edit: proof. According to scout.com, Wisconsin hasn't had a single 4-stsr olineman in the last 4 years. Boom.
I guess I should say that I haven't looked this up, but I'd bet Wisconsin does not get the highly rated o-linemen that Oklahoma and USC get. My point is they get their guys and make them great. They're either underrated or just developed well, but their o-line ratings wise probably does not compare to the above teams.
Edit: proof. According to scout.com, Wisconsin hasn't had a single 4-stsr olineman in the last 4 years. Boom.
OL is easily the hardest position to project. Just look at the lineman drafted the last 5 years. Not all 5 stars coming out of high school go in the first three rounds and plenty of 3 star guys go ahead of them. I believe there is a thread somewhere that discusses all this at length.
OL is easily the hardest position to project. Just look at the lineman drafted the last 5 years. Not all 5 stars coming out of high school go in the first three rounds and plenty of 3 star guys go ahead of them. I believe there is a thread somewhere that discusses all this at length.
I'd have to imagine thats true. I don't know a ton about all the intangibles D1 programs look for in a OL recruits tape. I know foot movement, pad levels, explosion, hand placements are some of them but I wouldn't really be able to decipher elite from average.
When watching Stanley's tape I came away saying to myself "It looks like he's just mauling kids half his size on every play.. " How do the coaches evaluate this and what do they really take away from it?
I'd think the camps and competitions give the coaches a closer look at an OLs ability to handle close to their equal in athleticism.
He said Friday, son. And you said a million. Or is this a new bet? lol
will this be live online somewhere to watch?
Cinco minutos.
I heard 2. If it got moved to 2:20 I will be![]()