Excerpt from Mike Leach's book about Adam James

KPENN

Well-known member
Staff member
Messages
13,017
Reaction score
11,340
An exclusive excerpt from Mike Leach's book, Swing Your Sword - The Bonus - SI.com

Edit: I kinda worded the title a little weird, but i think you'll know what i meant
"Adam [James] was a kid who seemed like he had been given everything he wanted his whole life and acted like if things did not go exactly how he wanted, then it was because someone was treating him unfairly or his failures were somebody else's fault. He was a selfish player on and off the field who was counterproductive for our team and would be for any other team."
-- Graham Harrell, Texas Tech, QB, 2004-2008

Staffs debate their players' merits all the time. When Adam James was a receiver prospect from Celina, Texas, most of the Tech staff was against recruiting him. They didn't think he could play. I thought Adam could develop into a contributor.

Adam's daddy, Craig, came around and campaigned for his son. He talked about how good Adam was. It all started when we beat Cal in the Holiday Bowl. Craig, who was there to announce the game, came up to our hospitality room. He started talking about how great his kid was and how great the bloodlines of the James family were. I later found out that he tried giving the same sales pitch to the Nevada staff after calling their bowl game too.

Our staff thoroughly researched whether Adam James had any other scholarship offers. We didn't find any. We offered him a grayshirt, which meant that his scholarship wouldn't go into effect until January. He needed as much time as he could to develop. He was the last guy we signed in that recruiting class.

The thing about it is, Adam was big enough and moved decently. He was not fast, but he had pretty good hands. He could've fit into the role of tight end for us, but because he didn't work hard he was only marginally effective. We could never get him to move out from behind his father's coattails. Together, they believed that playing time was determined by politics and influence rather than hard work.

My biggest regret was not cutting Adam James. I kept hoping he'd develop a work ethic. He had two position coaches, first Dana Holgorsen, then Lincoln Riley. He didn't get along with either one.

As a coach, you want it to work out. We invested a lot of time in coaching Adam James. We worked hard to try to rehabilitate him to make him a working part of the team. We thought he may have simply been the victim of his dad's little-league father tendencies, and that he'd eventually find a way to be his own, independent person. But that didn't turn out to be the case. I should've cut my losses, but I was really hoping that he'd improve and stuck with him.

On December 14, 2009, as we began to prepare for the Alamo Bowl, I noticed Adam James nonchalantly going through our first period of practice. I told him if he didn't improve his effort, I was going to send him to "Muscle Beach," which is the area designated for injured players and for lifting weights that Bennie Wylie, our strength coach, oversees. Adam ignored the warning, so we sent him along with two other players over to Muscle Beach. Bennie told the three players they had to run laps and stairs. According to Bennie, Adam gave him attitude. Adam was the last one to finish each exercise and he danced through the discipline like he was mocking it. After the session at Muscle Beach, the other two players admitted their effort on the field had been unacceptable. They said they would work harder. Adam told Bennie that his effort had been fine and that the Tech coaches didn't know what they were doing.

Three days later, on December 17, Adam James again displayed his contempt for team rules and the coaching staff. He arrived at practice twenty minutes late, in street clothes, wearing sunglasses. He said he had a concussion. The team physician acknowledged that James had a mild concussion and limited him from physical activity until he was symptom free. The team policy dictated that all players, including injured players, attend practice in practice attire and participate in the manner permissible given the nature of their injury.

According to Steve Pincock, the team trainer, James was "walking the field" in an indifferent way. James was wearing street clothes and had a baseball cap on backwards, which, injured or not, he knew was against team rules. I asked Pincock why Adam wasn't dressed appropriately for practice. Pincock said he didn't know. This was the first he'd seen him because Adam was late. I asked him why Adam was wearing sunglasses. Pincock said Adam's eyes were sensitive to light because he had a concussion. I told Pincock to remove James from the field since he wasn't dressed properly, was late, and had a bad attitude while the rest of the team was practicing hard. I told Pincock to put him somewhere dark and have him do something.

At no point did I say to lock him in a room. I never told Pincock what he should do with Adam beyond getting him off the field and putting him somewhere dark since his eyes were sensitive to light.

Months later, when Adam James was deposed under oath, he said he found the incident "funny" and that he did not believe that I should have been fired. In fact, he texted his father about the incident while in the equipment garage because he thought he would "like" it, since they both have the same sense of humor.

On December 19 we held practice on our game field inside Jones Stadium. Before practice, Pincock gave me a rundown of the injured players. He asked me what I wanted him to do with Adam James. I told him do whatever he did last practice. Then, as I went down the tunnel to start practice, another one of our trainers told me Adam was in the media room.

According to Pincock's statement, he specifically told James not to go into the electrical closet by the media room. James admitted under oath that he ignored Pincock's instructions. He admitted that he let himself into that closet and that he shot a video -- a video that would start a firestorm of allegations -- because he thought it was funny.

Craig James told Tech chancellor Kent Hance that Adam had spent three hours in that electrical closet based on instructions from Pincock. That night, Craig called Larry Anders (chairman of the Tech board of regents) and complained that Adam had been forced to practice with a concussion and had been locked in an electrical closet. We'd already held out the starting quarterback for a month that season because he had a concussion -- the starting quarterback. Adam was forbidden to practice because he had a concussion. We wanted him away from the field.

According to both his and Anders's depositions, Craig demanded that I be fired. Hance called me and said that Craig had phoned Anders to complain about his son being forced to play before his concussion was healed, which was simply not true. I explained the situation to Hance, and also told him how often Craig called up the Tech coaches to lobby for more playing time for his son. I told him that Adam had been a constant discipline problem and that I planned on cutting him from the team. Hance told me not to cut Adam.

During the conversation Hance said he was going to give the Jameses three options: Adam could stay at Tech, and that we, as coaches, would help him become the best that he could be; he could transfer and we'd release him to any school he wanted; or he could stay at Tech, be a regular student and we'd continue to pay his scholarship, even though we didn't do this for any other student.

After speaking with Anders and Jerry Turner (vice chairman of the board of regents) Hance ordered an investigation into the Adam James matter, to be conducted by university attorney Charlotte Bingham. Interestingly, Bingham worked for Hance, not the president's office. Later that night she interviewed Craig James, who told her that Adam was required to stand in an electrical closet for hours.

She interviewed Adam, who told her that he had been forced to stand in the closet for five minutes. Neither of these statements were true.

Turner contacted Bingham on December 21, before she'd interviewed a single witness outside the James family. Turner instructed Bingham, Tech president Bailey, and AD Myers that the investigation should be used to terminate me. Neither Turner, Hance, nor any of the regents should've been involved or interfered with any of this. It is strictly prohibited by university policies and procedures. The entire matter should've been handled exclusively by the president and the athletic director.

Despite that, Bailey advised me that same day that while the investigation was no big deal, he was concerned that Hance was going to "railroad" me because of his business connections to Craig James. Bailey was so concerned that he had his assistant attend and keep a record of the investigation interviews.

When Bingham interviewed me, I told her about Adam James's poor work habits, that he showed up late for practice, that he did not have workout gear on, and that I did not want him loafing while his teammates were working hard. I also told her that I wanted the trainers to take him away from the field and put him in a dark place because he was sensitive to light, and that the trainers had handled him from there.

Bingham reported her findings to Anders, Bailey, Myers, Turner, and Hance, and did not recommend that I be fired. Hance called me to say that some members of the board of regents wanted me fired because of Craig James' complaints. Hance said they were going to take some sort of disciplinary action against me even though he couldn't explain what I'd done wrong.

The day after Christmas, two days after Hance told Anders and Turner he was going to fire me, I met with Myers and Bailey.

I told them I was happy to cooperate with the investigation. They handed me a letter dated December 23, signed by Bailey, acknowledging "the allegations by the James family had not been substantiated" despite, or perhaps as a result of, Ms. Bingham's investigation. They then told me I needed to sign a letter admitting wrongdoing on my part in the "mistreatment" of a student athlete. I told them I was innocent and I would not sign that letter.

We went back and forth for over an hour. They kept trying to get me to sign the letter and admit that I did something wrong, when they knew that I didn't.

Bailey and Myers assured me that they wanted me to be their coach, that this was not about getting rid of me, that they were not trying to fire me, that this incident was only a little thing, and that if I would just sign this letter it would all go away. This obviously turned out not to be the case.
 
Last edited:

Kak7304

Well-known member
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
361
This is pretty much the scenario I imagined when the story first broke. Adam James seemed like a spoiled kid that feels like everything should be handed to him because of who he is.
 

irishrecruiting

New member
Messages
117
Reaction score
6
This is pretty much the scenario I imagined when the story first broke. Adam James seemed like a spoiled kid that feels like everything should be handed to him because of who he is.

I agree with this. Obviously there are conflicting stories, opinions, ideas and there always will be. But my opinion is the same as yours...I'm siding with Mike Leach on this. His story/argument is stronger in my opinion.
 

phork

Raining On Your Parade
Messages
9,863
Reaction score
1,019
The fact that James' dad helped take out SMU the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Another punk kid thinking he is entitled because of his name.
 

ndfi78

Well-known member
Messages
1,279
Reaction score
104
Yup, even though there are usually two sides to every story I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly what happened. James is a bitch, pure and simple.
 

ndcoltsfan2010

Well-known member
Messages
2,642
Reaction score
134
I can definently see this kind of thing happening with a kid like James. An arrogant kid with an overwhelming sense of entitlement. Interesting read for sure, thanks for sharing it.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
This side of the story makes perfect sense. The side of the story Texas Tech and Craig James purported had a bunch of "huh?" moments. I'll take this one.
 

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,965
Reaction score
6,453
I cannot contribute anything to Coach Leach's story. but i can confirm through my brothers, who know many people in the football community, that the younger James was a person who was not a dedicated worker nor a team-mate. Their "read" on his personality would fit certain elements of Leach's rendition of events, at least.
 

BestBIrish47

Well-known member
Messages
1,697
Reaction score
195
Well, the James Family has helped destroy 1 Texas program (SMU) and set back another (TTech) who's up for the Hat trick... Does he have anymore kiddos...I would love to Texas A&M to get it next. ha ha
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
Leach is a great coach as well. It's a travesty that he is getting black listed around college football. When Leach cant even get an interview for the Pitt job, something is up. bs
 

phork

Raining On Your Parade
Messages
9,863
Reaction score
1,019
Leach might be a great coach, but he is d1ck by all accounts.
 

Ben E.

CRUSADER
Messages
892
Reaction score
87
Leach might be a great coach, but he is d1ck by all accounts.

all div 1 headcoaches s are dicks but some just hide it better than others. power corrupts....
 
Last edited:
J

johnnykillz

Guest
Leach is a great coach as well. It's a travesty that he is getting black listed around college football. When Leach cant even get an interview for the Pitt job, something is up. bs

Maybe an AD will consider hiring him, if they happen to have an agreement in place that won't allow him access to dark closets, etc..
 

Veer option

Anti sarcasm font
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
208
For every dip dunk like James there are 1000 kids who would kill to be a Div 1 football player. What a ---- head.
 

Rhode Irish

Semi-retired
Messages
7,057
Reaction score
900
I'm sure James is every bit as bad as Leach describes, and probably worse. Leach is a smug sonofabitch, but I'm totally on his side on this one.
 

Ben E.

CRUSADER
Messages
892
Reaction score
87
leach will have to accept that he must first be an O coordinator again before he is a head coach again. who knows maybe stoops will take him back?
 

NDbrbkny

Member
Messages
703
Reaction score
23
leach will have to accept that he must first be an O coordinator again before he is a head coach again. who knows maybe stoops will take him back?

Stoops has 2 of his young men heupel?sp and norvall as his oc's. besides he why cant he get a hc job because they know there is a lawsuit pending?
 

Ben E.

CRUSADER
Messages
892
Reaction score
87
Stoops has 2 of his young men heupel?sp and norvall as his oc's. besides he why cant he get a hc job because they know there is a lawsuit pending?

yes stoops does but that job traditionaly has been a stepping stone to HC jobs so heupel etc may not be long for their current position. really i was speaking to the fact that he unfortunately has tried and not been able to gain employment as a head coach.(hell even minnesota wouldnt hire him) big time football always seems to retread old head coaches once they step back to lower positions...
 

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
Multiple management and editorial sources at ESPN have told me in recent months that Feldman would only participate in the Leach book project upon direct approval from ESPN management - which Feldman indeed received.

Since the book was released on Monday, Feldman has deliberately avoided any personal promotion or mention of the Leach book. (You will find no mention of the book on Feldman’s Twitter account and ESPN blog.)

Despite those facts, Feldman was told by ESPN executives Doria, Hoenig and Stiegman today that he was being suspended indefinitely for his participation in the Leach book.

There's probably more to come out but it would appear Feldman has a case.
 

Rhode Irish

Semi-retired
Messages
7,057
Reaction score
900
How does Craig James have so much pull? He isn't Chris "YWML" Berman. He's just a guy that does some football games.

The other thing I don't get is, if ESPN had known about his participation all along, why was he not suspended until the book was released? Seems like there must have been something in the book that they had specifically asked him not to include.
 
Last edited:

irishrecruiting

New member
Messages
117
Reaction score
6
How does Craig James have so much pull? He isn't Chris "YWML" Berman. He's just a guy that does some football games.

The other thing I don't get is, if ESPN had known about his participation all along, why was he not suspended until the book was released? Seems like there must have been something in the book that they had specifically asked him not to include.

ESPN's decision sickens me. I think Feldman is one of the best writers' they have. If James did have any say, then I've lost any respect I had for ESPN (not that I had much for its ethics). Incredible loss for ESPN. "Meat Market" (Feldman's book about recruiting) is still one of my favorite books on sports.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
if ESPN had known about his participation all along, why was he not suspended until the book was released? Seems like there must have been something in the book that they had specifically asked him not to include.

That's probably exactly why! I'm sure that ESPN thought that, by allowing Feldman to participate, they could control what was being said about the Network and/or their (apparently) Golden Boy, Craig James. When they saw the book, and realized that it was an honest (presumably) account of the James situation, they blew a gasket.
 

Who'saWildManNow

Bald Prick
Messages
3,863
Reaction score
485
Interesting talk on Feinbaum today.. They seem to think Leach would be a perfect fit at Ole Miss. I could see it.
 

ndfi78

Well-known member
Messages
1,279
Reaction score
104
It is ridiculous, and I will be voting with my page views. I won't be going back to espn.com until after he is reinstated. Can't avoid them for college games on TV but I can avoid them on the internet.

What would be great is if someone would write up a letter that we could all email to them to express our displeasure. I would do it but I write like a 10 year old. :/
 

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,965
Reaction score
6,453
I am usually not into the negative, but Craig James has never been a favorite. He, as much as anyone, has [in my opinion] overstated on ESPN the wonderfulness of southern football at the expense of any other teams. And he did that before it was really justified by the recent NC dominance. He tends to conveniently overlook the illegalities of the southern powers, and has consistently not given credit to teams from other areas to the extent they could have had ... he has loosened up a little on this the past couple of seasons, particularly as he has gone about the country on the show with Jesse Palmer [who is much more open-minded and generous --- growing up in Canada vs Texas may have something to do with whether intractable regional bias exists in the two men].

Coach Leach is, on the other hand, a completely different sort of fish. Despite what we think, he seems to be generally liked by people in the profession, and thought of a a dry wit bordering on hilarious [sort of like Bob Knight when he's behaving; or Bob Huggins --- all three of those guys do not suffer fools lightly, and so p!ss some folks off].

Leach is an off-center football genius whose major flaw is not being willing to suck up to big boosters in meetings set up to, well, suck up to them. In that, he is probably not head-coach material politically, though it is a trait that I admire. If he'd accept it, he should be an O-coordinator under a good politician [someone like Mack Brown who wouldn't get in his way].

Leach is academically-oriented in his unorthodox way, and demands that players pay attention to that part of college. Thus Texas Tech went from crud in the classroom to the leader in graduation rate among public universities. {79% is not Notre Dame, but nobody is}. This is the source of the second most famous "odd coaching behavior" that is cited in reference to him. When a player was falling behind his studies, Leach required him to bring his desk onto the practice field and do homework while his teammates were practicing and watching. Some might view this as cruel punishment, but I think that it's brilliant.

Leach is a "political" risk as a hire. But, in my opinion, not for the reason that people think.
 
Top