Aug 31 | Texas A&M

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
Alabama at 2 immediately destroys the credibility of that list.

I've been to a few games there, and it's nowhere near one of the toughest or loudest environments. It's not bad, but it's not on the same level as Death Valley (both of them) or Between the Hedges or Beaver Stadium.
 

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
3,244
Reaction score
2,507
Alabama at 2 immediately destroys the credibility of that list.

I've been to a few games there, and it's nowhere near one of the toughest or loudest environments. It's not bad, but it's not on the same level as Death Valley (both of them) or Between the Hedges or Beaver Stadium.
LSU night games at home are beyond crazy……..
 

ND7983

Banned
Messages
536
Reaction score
1,062
Alabama at 2 immediately destroys the credibility of that list.

I've been to a few games there, and it's nowhere near one of the toughest or loudest environments. It's not bad, but it's not on the same level as Death Valley (both of them) or Between the Hedges or Beaver Stadium.
Nick Saban went on a rant a couple years ago about how Bama fans leave early or don’t show up at all to games.
Bama lost more home games under Saban in their title runs than away games.
 

arrowryan

Well-known member
Messages
14,715
Reaction score
8,917
This probably means nothing, but Weigman’s throw wasn’t even close. Like, barely in the same area code.

 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,481
Reaction score
14,204
aHR0cHM6Ly9maWdodGluZ2lyaXNoLmNvbS93cC1jb250ZW50L3VwbG9hZHMvMjAxMi8xMi84NDI0NDctMS5qcGVn.jpg


50 days away.
 

condoms SUCk

Varsity Club Member
Messages
1,992
Reaction score
391
For those in Texas, the Dallas ND Alumni club has more 2 tickets availble for auction. I got the OSU and SC home tix from there over the past few years, it's legit.
 

IA4irish

Well-known member
Messages
1,825
Reaction score
2,569

Good for Mack brown to call out Elko. I know negative recruiting happens everywhere, but I’m glad when coaches push back. I think we in particular have coaches negative recruit against us.
 

bige4irish

Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
31

Good for Mack brown to call out Elko. I know negative recruiting happens everywhere, but I’m glad when coaches push back. I think we in particular have coaches negative recruit against us.
Joe Paterno was in his mid eighties when he was dismissed at penn st. Coach Brown is, I think 72 years old & he seems a lot more spunky than Joe pa did in his last 15 years. As an older high school football coach myself (57 years old), being around the young folks makes me feel younger than my years. I am sure Coach Brown feels the same. Good for him for calling elko out on it. I know it happens everywhere, but not many coaches acknowledge it and force it to be out there in the public. To me, it’s like a politician that only talks about what their opponent has done and doesn’t discuss what they can do. Makes Elko look like, IMO, he can’t compete coaching wise with Coach Brown so he has to try and knock him.
 

IA4irish

Well-known member
Messages
1,825
Reaction score
2,569
Austin Mock's model ranks the top 25 college football teamsCollege football top 25: A model’s rankings and projected win totals for 2024

One of the writers at the Athletic has a computer model for rankings. This is an overall power ranking that takes into account box scores, recruiting, returning production. We are 9th. Number 10 is A&M. We are projected at 9.4 wins. We play 4 teams in the rankings
 

MrNimbus

Well-known member
Messages
450
Reaction score
1,098

Good for Mack brown to call out Elko. I know negative recruiting happens everywhere, but I’m glad when coaches push back. I think we in particular have coaches negative recruit against us.

I've never wanted to win players over by negative recruiting tactics. Let your school speak for itself. Urban Meyer comes to my mind immediately whenever I hear "negative recruiting".
 

PutuporShutup

Banned
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
1,909
I've never wanted to win players over by negative recruiting tactics. Let your school speak for itself. Urban Meyer comes to my mind immediately whenever I hear "negative recruiting".
Agree but the 4 for 40 or 4 for life mantra is a dig at other schools academics
 

IHateMarkMay

IHateDavidPollackToo
Messages
3,902
Reaction score
1,020
Agree but the 4 for 40 or 4 for life mantra is a dig at other schools academics
I see where you are coming from, as in "we do this" meaning you can't get this everywhere. However, that's like saying Bama negatively recruits by saying they put kids in the NFL or UGA saying they have the best chance to win championships.
 

PutuporShutup

Banned
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
1,909
I see where you are coming from, as in "we do this" meaning you can't get this everywhere. However, that's like saying Bama negatively recruits by saying they put kids in the NFL or UGA saying they have the best chance to win championships.
Or “we put wrs in the nfl, that other school you are interested in (nd) doesn’t”

“The nd degree will set you up for life, the other schools you’re interested in don’t have that”
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,077
Agree but the 4 for 40 or 4 for life mantra is a dig at other schools academics

Disagree.

Neg recruiting is when your primary selling point is about another school's shortfall directly, moreso than the positives of your own program.

ND's "4 for 40" pitch is a strict ND focus. They aren't mentioning the other schools they're recruiting against when they make that pitch (from what I've been told by two people who have been in recruiting visits).

scUM trying to sell their WR production vs ND's recently would be negative recruiting, because their draft success hasn't been much better than ND's in that regard.

scUM selling their defense as elite and referencing stats from other places is kind of neg recruiting... but not really, because the primary pitch is driven by their own success, not the shortfall of other programs.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
I think what might be fairly construed as neg recruiting is not so much that Notre Dame pitches "4 for 40" for itself, as the way we all roll our eyes when other schools (like, say, Ohio State) claim similar.

But we message board heroes are not the ones doing the recruiting. I'd be curious how our coaches counter the claims that going to Ohio State will set you up for life basically just as well (b/c the reality is, for most of these kids, attending Ohio State will also probably turn out just fine. It seems to have worked well for our head coach).
 

PutuporShutup

Banned
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
1,909
Disagree.

Neg recruiting is when your primary selling point is about another school's shortfall directly, moreso than the positives of your own program.

ND's "4 for 40" pitch is a strict ND focus. They aren't mentioning the other schools they're recruiting against when they make that pitch (from what I've been told by two people who have been in recruiting visits).

scUM trying to sell their WR production vs ND's recently would be negative recruiting, because their draft success hasn't been much better than ND's in that regard.

scUM selling their defense as elite and referencing stats from other places is kind of neg recruiting... but not really, because the primary pitch is driven by their own success, not the shortfall of other programs.
Nds mantra isn’t directed at a specific school but they absolutely are talking to recruits about nds degree vs other specific schools when in a recruiting battle. Nd 100% shares NDs graduation rates for its players and shows the rates of say lsu when battling them for a recruit.

With that said, my understanding is ND does far less negative recruiting than most.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,380
Reaction score
5,807
Nds mantra isn’t directed at a specific school but they absolutely are talking to recruits about nds degree vs other specific schools when in a recruiting battle. Nd 100% shares NDs graduation rates for its players and shows the rates of say lsu when battling them for a recruit.

With that said, my understanding is ND does far less negative recruiting than most.
When discussing academics at LSU, one should never forget...

This is because Mr. Claiborne’s woeful score suggests that he spent three years playing football at the finest public university that Louisiana has to offer and came out functionally illiterate.
 

Katzenboyer

Well-known member
Messages
1,922
Reaction score
3,183
I've never wanted to win players over by negative recruiting tactics. Let your school speak for itself. Urban Meyer comes to my mind immediately whenever I hear "negative recruiting".

Any list of negative recruiters has to start with James Franklin. Guy is a complete POS when it comes to badmouthing other programs.

It's even more laughable that he tends to play the "holier than thou" card when making public statements about OTHER schools neg recruiting PSU. Really dislike the guy.
 

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
6,932
Reaction score
2,253
Disagree.

Neg recruiting is when your primary selling point is about another school's shortfall directly, moreso than the positives of your own program.

ND's "4 for 40" pitch is a strict ND focus. They aren't mentioning the other schools they're recruiting against when they make that pitch (from what I've been told by two people who have been in recruiting visits).

scUM trying to sell their WR production vs ND's recently would be negative recruiting, because their draft success hasn't been much better than ND's in that regard.

scUM selling their defense as elite and referencing stats from other places is kind of neg recruiting... but not really, because the primary pitch is driven by their own success, not the shortfall of other programs.
I was going to say Brilliant post but then realized you're responding to Super-Donk, whom I have on my one-person Ignore List.
 

MrNimbus

Well-known member
Messages
450
Reaction score
1,098
I've changed my mind. If someone wants to use this for nd while recruiting against certain teams I'm all for it

4 for 40 vs...
0f38b2482b66cf1e52220aa376e435de.jpg
Then when they actually commit somewhere else:
"Hope your 40 time is great, because you'll have to catch the bus when you don't make the nfl and already blew through all your nil money you piece of shit."
But I've also had several beers tonight. It's 10am somewhere, am I right?
 

Some Irish Bloke

Five foot nothin', a hundred and nothin'
Messages
6,346
Reaction score
5,922
Nds mantra isn’t directed at a specific school but they absolutely are talking to recruits about nds degree vs other specific schools when in a recruiting battle. Nd 100% shares NDs graduation rates for its players and shows the rates of say lsu when battling them for a recruit.

With that said, my understanding is ND does far less negative recruiting than most.
I agree with Lion and completely disagree with you trying to spin a general "4 for 40" as anyway neg recruiting. Allow me to mansplain.

ND saying "we are a great academic institution" isn't negative recruiting another school. Literally at all.

Negative recruiting is like BK saying "We have great facilities; ND Has shitty facilities."

In and of itself, saying "we have state of the art facilities and dorms" isn't negative recruiting. It's boasting about what your school could offer. ND saying, think about the long term, it's 4 for 40 here, great football, great education" isn't negative recruiting until they say "LSU's degree is literally the equivalent of Charmin Ultra Strong."

It's not that complicated. There's a big difference.
 

DONTH8

Definitely not Coach BD
Messages
1,583
Reaction score
1,667
I agree with Lion and completely disagree with you trying to spin a general "4 for 40" as anyway neg recruiting. Allow me to mansplain.

ND saying "we are a great academic institution" isn't negative recruiting another school. Literally at all.

Negative recruiting is like BK saying "We have great facilities; ND Has shitty facilities."

In and of itself, saying "we have state of the art facilities and dorms" isn't negative recruiting. It's boasting about what your school could offer. ND saying, think about the long term, it's 4 for 40 here, great football, great education" isn't negative recruiting until they say "LSU's degree is literally the equivalent of Charmin Ultra Strong."

It's not that complicated. There's a big difference.
I think it just shows why PutUp's mindset always comes across as contrarian or pessimistic since he thinks beyond the general statement to what it's inferring. Not a bad thing, per se. Just a different way to view the world/statement.

I can understand what he's saying. There is that inference to be had if someone wants to look at it that way. And I believe that everyone would to some extent think that when making their final decision at least subconsciously. But in that world, there is no such thing as positive recruiting since there would always be an inference of a "negative."

I think you think the same way I do about what is "negative recruiting." But from a literal sense, which is where I think PutUp is coming from, I understand what they are saying. It's a circular argument since I think the definition here is in the eye of the beholder. Nothing more.
 

PutuporShutup

Banned
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
1,909
I agree with Lion and completely disagree with you trying to spin a general "4 for 40" as anyway neg recruiting. Allow me to mansplain.

ND saying "we are a great academic institution" isn't negative recruiting another school. Literally at all.

Negative recruiting is like BK saying "We have great facilities; ND Has shitty facilities."

In and of itself, saying "we have state of the art facilities and dorms" isn't negative recruiting. It's boasting about what your school could offer. ND saying, think about the long term, it's 4 for 40 here, great football, great education" isn't negative recruiting until they say "LSU's degree is literally the equivalent of Charmin Ultra Strong."

It's not that complicated. There's a big difference.
Agree but when ND is going against Georgia for a player as an example and gives its nd football graduation rate vs georgia (since Georgia was last recently), isn’t that negative recruiting? That happens
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,481
Reaction score
14,204
I continue to see some scenarios coming from here and there among ND fans, pundits, etc. that suggest ND could lose this TAMU opener and then win out. If you're giving me that on a silver platter on August 1st, I'd be inclined to say yes, but I really think they can go down there and beat them regardless.

By that same token, I could see an 11-1 finish at the end despite beating TAMU.
 
Top