Maybe they have secured some other sources of funding which negates the need for online donations? Thats the only thing that initially comes to mind but you would think even in that situation, online donations would still be helpful.So on TOS, people were mentioning that the FUND used to have a donate feature on their website, but that has since gone missing.
I reached out to the FUND and asked them how would somebody be able to donate on their site. This was their response:
Okay.....but why?
The whole purpose of the FUND is to provide student athletes with the opportunity partner with charitable organizations and create a network so they can benefit from their image, all while providing them with a stipend. Removing the option to donate online severely limits that prospect, thus reduces the potential for a player to maximize their image.
That body doy. Pretty close to perfection. She was gonna be getting looks one way or another. 1st world problemShe could be the next Allison Stokke. Parlayed her viral fame and ended up married to Rickie Fowler.
![]()
You think the online one time donations make up a significant portion of their funds?So on TOS, people were mentioning that the FUND used to have a donate feature on their website, but that has since gone missing.
I reached out to the FUND and asked them how would somebody be able to donate on their site. This was their response:
Okay.....but why?
The whole purpose of the FUND is to provide student athletes with the opportunity partner with charitable organizations and create a network so they can benefit from their image, all while providing them with a stipend. Removing the option to donate online severely limits that prospect, thus reduces the potential for a player to maximize their image.
2006 was a rough year for meImagine selfconfessing to online group circle jerking - and being a member of Rivals - in the same sentence.
That's a bunch of hail marys and our fathers to repent
You have to strike while the irons hot!She says that, but I have a hard time believing someone who became an athletic model for Nike, GoPro, Athleta, and Uniglo, and then later married Rickie Fowler, doesn't enjoy attention and fame. Obviously there will be creepy followers, and that side of things no celebrity likes, but she clearly embraced the viral wave her photos put her on and capitalized on that attention.
I guess, because the internet has been around a lot longer. lol2006 was a rough year for me
I think it's part of the reason.https://www.si.com/college/2023/06/10/irs-name-image-likeness-collectives-not-tax-exempt
Think this probably has something to do with FUND no longer accepting donations
Well I guess I’ll just have to take my Andrew Jackson and stick it in the offering plate for The Pope’s NIL instead of ND’s. Thanks Joe Biden.I think it's part of the reason.
Another I've heard is that the FUND recently added a few new members to their board, who are billionaires. So that is big money being attached to the FUND and it's probably a helluva lot easier for the FUND to do the paperwork on a few major donations from board members than it is to do paperwork on thousands of smaller donations from a bunch of rando's.
Interesting article by Kevin White about the state of college athletics as he sees it.
*yea I know… Charlie Weis contract yada
Kevin White’s Opinion
I mean, when was CFB not a minor league/developmental league for the NFL? The only difference between the proverbial good ole days and now is that the players get to benefit from their play on the field and work off the field.I'm not reading the entire article, but I think it's obvious college football (at least the power conferences and programs) needs to separate and part ways from the NCAA. With the exception of a handful of basketball programs and a few baseball programs, college football programs fund their entire athletic department. Whether you like it or not, college football has successfully been established as a minor league / farm league system, and it needs to be treated as such. Just drop the "student-athlete" (emphasis on the former) moniker and create a system to let it rule itself.
Yep. People thinking that college football really was ever “amateur” are just lying to themselves. It’s absurd to place high expectations on teams and players, then think they should be happy with a scholarship as the only form of compensation.I mean, when was CFB not a minor league/developmental league for the NFL? The only difference between the proverbial good ole days and now is that the players get to benefit from their play on the field and work off the field.
I'm not reading the entire article, but I think it's obvious college football (at least the power conferences and programs) needs to separate and part ways from the NCAA. With the exception of a handful of basketball programs and a few baseball programs, college football programs fund their entire athletic department. Whether you like it or not, college football has successfully been established as a minor league / farm league system, and it needs to be treated as such. Just drop the "student-athlete" (emphasis on the former) moniker and create a system to let it rule itself.
I highly doubt that’ll ever happen. Where would they play? Because at that point they wouldn’t be college students. States aren’t going to allow money be spent on scholarships on athletes that never attended class.
At one point, they most certainly were amateur. It is also a serious issue that scholarships are seen as not suitable compensation. If you want better compensation, go to the better school where the scholarship holds greater value.Yep. People thinking that college football really was ever “amateur” are just lying to themselves. It’s absurd to place high expectations on teams and players, then think they should be happy with a scholarship as the only form of compensation.
I think the issue is that the value of the education doesn't equate value being generated. With the explosion of value for TV rights, a scholarship just doesn't cut it.At one point, they most certainly were amateur. It is also a serious issue that scholarships are seen as not suitable compensation. If you want better compensation, go to the better school where the scholarship holds greater value.
The issue is the devaluing scholarships and education for student-athletes.
I mean, many people go into a lifetime of debt to get an education.I think the issue is that the value of the education doesn't equate value being generated. With the explosion of value for TV rights, a scholarship just doesn't cut it.
How many guys on a given team actually go pro? We need to stop acting like these teams have 90% of the 85 man roster that needs treated like a pro player. The facilities, recovery/training, food plans are all even or better than the NFL at these schools already. Before NIL, they were also getting monthly stipends as well.Yep. People thinking that college football really was ever “amateur” are just lying to themselves. It’s absurd to place high expectations on teams and players, then think they should be happy with a scholarship as the only form of compensation.
Who?I mean, many people go into a lifetime of debt to get an education.
I’d think most college athletes don’t individually generate hundreds of thousands in revenue. As a collective they might. When you pay for an education, you’re looking at over 100k paid directly to the university.Who?
Who does that while also directly assisting in the generation of massive amounts of revenue for a university?
...ughI’d think most college athletes don’t individually generate hundreds of thousands in revenue. As a collective they might. When you pay for an education, you’re looking at over 100k paid directly to the university.
And believe or not but many have to take out loans that prove to be difficult to handle at a young age without relying on family to assist them.
www.forbes.com