At some point, there is no argument to be won. It’s circular, and the only out is to disengage and get off the treadmill.
I can appreciate this perspective, in part because it does acknowledge that the hiring of Freeman was not just because he is a nice guy and well liked. Please correct me if I’m wrong. I don’t want to speak for you. But I think you have reasonable hope in that our coach is not just a shell of a person, but has demonstrable coaching talent and competitiveness.
Now, how he navigates this transition in totality is what will ultimately determine his legacy at ND, and we know that in spite of some riches inherited, we also know that certain things are not working out, including a seemingly disjointed coaching scenario between headcoach and offensive coordinator. To be a good man in this world is an intense challenge of balancing priorities and goals. I do believe that Freeman wants to be good and do the right thing morally in a situation that involves another young coach who has demonstrated loyalty to the university, the team, and him. Yet, he will have to make some tough choices, one of which will likely be to let go of that person at season’s end.