I really hope we get to judge Rees when he has a full roster of guys he recruited for the offense he wants to run.
It's a little more than that. Despite coming in with the reputation of a 4-vert spread guru who could "manufacture offense" at will, Kelly's hallmark at ND has been defense.
That's where I'm at. Last year he really overperformed given his top 2 WRs going into the season were hurt (Austin, Lenzy) and his QB wouldn't pull the trigger on open players downfield. Plus, our RBs were a giant question mark going into the year. Last year still had a lot of great memories and we're solidifying our position in the top 6-8, now we just need to take another step.
Rees knows this offense has to be different this year, I'm really excited to see how he puts the pieces together. He has a lot of talent to use and he knows what we can expect from the RBs and TEs. Now we'll see who wants to step up in the WR, OL and QB rooms.
Some of that is coaching, right? He's been the QB coach since 2017. Did Book improve on the things he didn't do well from back in 2018? Did his pocket presence get better? Did he get better at going through is progressions and moving the offense from the pocket? Or, did Rees just let him do what he was good at? Which is fine but it doesn't really show much coaching and give us reasons to expect the next QB will improve due to Rees, right? FWIW, all of Ian's meaningful stats were worse, in 2020, than they were in 2018, and some of them cratered in 2019.
Those things don't give me optimism that the next QB that he coaches for a few years will be any different. But, I'm willing to give him time to figure it out with his offense and recruits.
That's because BK knows you need a very good D when you step up to the next level.
No. Didn’t think I conveyed a tone of less than calm, just expressing a possible opposite view point. It is the “state of the recruiting class” thread.
Rees has a lot to prove and I hope he gets the time to do so. But, I'm in 100% show me mode for offensive recruiting and coaching. I was a fan of the hire and I've given him credit where credit is due. But, there are plenty of reasons for criticism at this point. Too much to ignore and hopefully those are all being addressed and we start to see the results soon.
37, bruh. I'm not officially "old" for three more years.
That's because BK knows you need a very good D when you step up to the next level.
Unfortunately for Tommy (who is not outspoken), BK hired a DC with a rah rah salesman personality and is being unfairly judged by that.
Does this mean Rees is beyond criticism or perfect? No. But there seems to be people jumping through hoops to fault him for the hand he was dealt when he has made the most f that hand in his one year in charge of the offense and as a lead recruiter.
I haven't seen many people faulting Rees for our offensive weaknesses in 2020. Most fans seem super impressed with what he accomplished as a first year coordinator. But it's not being unfair to Rees to point out: (1) that mediocre offensive production has been a perennial issue for Kelly's ND teams; (2) that we have a lot more work to do to close the gap with 'Bama and Clemson on that side of the ball; and (3) that taking the next step offensively would be a huge task for even the most experienced OCs in the country, let alone a scrappy ND alumnus in his first major coaching gig.
You're talking to the guy who was anti-Fleck from day 1 because I hate shtick. So if anything, that's a mark in Rees' favor.
For a 1st year OC, he did extremely well. But you don't get the benefit of a handicap when coaching at ND, and odds are not good that he can out-recruit and out-coach Venables and Saban.
It's early, and it might be that Rees and co. will have a great 2023 class, but there's just not much excitement.
If BK decided tomorrow to pull a Bob Stoops, who here would advocate for Tommy over Freeman? I certainly wouldn't and I think that's the point.
You're talking to the guy who was anti-Fleck from day 1 because I hate shtick. So if anything, that's a mark in Rees' favor.
For a 1st year OC, he did extremely well. But you don't get the benefit of a handicap when coaching at ND, and odds are not good that he can out-recruit and out-coach Venables and Saban.
Some of that is coaching, right? He's been the QB coach since 2017. Did Book improve on the things he didn't do well from back in 2018? Did his pocket presence get better? Did he get better at going through is progressions and moving the offense from the pocket? Or, did Rees just let him do what he was good at? Which is fine but it doesn't really show much coaching and give us reasons to expect the next QB will improve due to Rees, right? FWIW, all of Ian's meaningful stats were worse, in 2020, than they were in 2018, and some of them cratered in 2019.
Those things don't give me optimism that the next QB that he coaches for a few years will be any different. But, I'm willing to give him time to figure it out with his offense and recruits.
So now the measure of success for our coordinators is who you would make HC in the event of a unexpected coach retirement?
TBH I think Elston gets the interim gig in your scenario
I would be really surprised if we didn't land Merriweather and CJ Williams at this point. Both are taking their time, to varying degrees, so a lot can change but I think ND has been putting in work there and is going to close. Schrauth and his dad are ND fans, I think that wins out versus pressure from other sources. No clue on the rest. I think/hope ND will close well though... keeping guys in the fold will be the bigger challenge. There are a lot of thirsty coaching staffs out there.