Warning read at your own risk!
Warning read at your own risk!
Short Article -- Essay on the future of ND coaching and Mike Sanford, Jr.
I can understand everybody's posts on this thread. I think they are very reasonable and well thought out. Especially since, (and it is the one thing everybody everywhere agrees upon), is that Mike Sanford Jr., is on track to be a outstanding, even elite coach.
Coach in waiting
Now about this 'coach in waiting' cliché of a title -- I think my real problem with the concept is two-fold : it is reminiscent of an aristocratic hierarchy, which I rail against; and, aristocratic models just don't work well in the American business model, historically, or practicably in today's climate.
Rambling historical precedence
Historically, the example of the cotton industry in the Antebellum South is a wonderful example. It is the only thing, (including the blatant race and sexism,) that I don't like about the South!
The fact of the matter is the aristocratic model of England was copied precisely to the deep south, and plagued the economy of the South, just as it did in England, until many labor and social reforms took place.
Why go into that detail here? No business, or coaching staff can be successful above a certain level, and size, with such a model in place. The same that is true for business is definitely true for college football coaching.
Lessons learned -- why no 'coach in waiting' will ever be a thing at ND
That, in my opinion (as well as others,) was Brian Kelly's biggest shortcoming as he rose in the coaching ranks. He had to wear many hats in the Division III ranks, fewer but still do a lot in the MAC.
It is interesting to note, as I meet people that worked for or with Kelly at his various stops, that those familiar with him at the smaller schools saw him as genuine, and those that saw him on his quick ascent, generally saw him as egocentric, with airs of superiority.
I believe that was mostly BK's doing, trying to hold on to too much, as his early career taught him. And, Kelly came out and said it in his last press conference, on signing day. He had a whole series of answers to questions that revolved about distributing coaching responsibility, and authority to his assistants. He just talked about it in terms of how with his past experience from actually doing the job, he knows how it needs to be done, and that (now) enables him to do better.
From ND's standpoint KMoose is 100% right on target. ND has been burned by doling out to much to coaches, with no guarantee for return. Weis, Willingham, and Davies, (who was really a coach in waiting, as well as a predator,) all are examples of this phenomena. It is no mistake they didn't have to compete, or answer to anyone for their success. Period. So the Irish administration took a while to come around, but I believe has learned their lesson.
What makes Mike tick?
When you listen to Mike Sanford Jr., you hear a repeating theme. He likes being in South Bend, for his families sake, remember his whole family is here now with his father coaching at a school only several hours away, and loves the culture at Notre Dame. Remember his dad is at a school presently. a thirty year veteran, where he could coach until retirement. None of the above is a wild guess, or a stretch. Mike craves the stability for his family that he didn't have as a youngster, and the stability he really hasn't had yet as a coach, principally because of his meteoric rise in the business.
And I believe if you translate what Sanford said in the few questions he answered or comments he made about selecting ND over other offers (read tOSU,) it was because he saw more opportunity to develop himself as a coach, in line with his own values, more so than at any other career stop available.
Now that assistants are paid competitive salaries, with Notre Dame's recruiting taking leaps and bounds forward, (both a maturing program and the best recruiting talent since the first seven years of the Holtz era,) it affords him a great opportunity, one that he will exploit much like Kirby, now at UGA.
Kirby could have been a head coach much earlier if he wanted. But with hindsight, almost everyone agrees, that his selectivity, before he pulled the trigger, was way the best move for him!
Situation at ND
As far as Notre Dame, and it's next coach, in particular after looking at the staff currently, do you realize, by the end of Kelly's contract, (if not sooner,) there could be five assistants that could advance internally to the head coaching position? And if they did, I could see it as a stabilizing event, and a seamless transition that would do nothing but provide continuity to the program, promote a successful culture, and insure consistent high levels of winning.
I think there are several coaches that implicitly know that they could be promoted to the next boss. And I think Jack the shark knows that too. But, I don't think there is anything official, or even organization to it.
Shameless Opinion and conclusion (Thanks be to Jesus!)
I could even see Sanford staying if he wasn't the head coach. I could see a scenario where Denbrock became the head coach, Sanford assistant head coach, and Denson the running game coordinator. And when Sanford moved up, if he stayed and did, moving Denson to the OC.
So I think to produce the highest level of coaching, there is no official blueprint, instead an atmosphere where there is a kind of friendly competition, where each coach is trying to better himself as a coach. Good for the program, isn't that?
And, I don't see Mike Sanford, Jr., as anything like Bob Diaco, Charlie Molnar, Ed Warinner, or even Tony Alford.
(Tony is much different than anyone else on this list, other than he is primarily driven by becoming a head coach.) No, Mike is much more Kirby Smart!