That's fine, but you don't change it in the middle of an investigation into high-profile varsity athletes. There are probably some changes to be made (having a sitting honesty committee during the summer session so these things can be handled before students return in the fall, for example), but you can't make those changes mid-incident. That's the kind of thing that makes the NCAA go "hmm..."
That's fine, but I guess my confusion is, does anyone know what the actual process is?
In my line of work, a "Process" is a set of tasks, in a scheduled order, that takes place to satisfy a job or requirement. Is that what this is? Is there an actual established order? Even in this thread, from people on the "know", it's sounds like there is a bunch of assumptions. When people meet, who needs to see, if they're ineligible, what then? Where does it go? When?
That's not a process, that sounds like making crap up as we go, when people feel like doing it.
And I've seen people talk about the Army suspensions and expulsions. Yea, in the 50's.
It's 2014. The ability to acquire and analyze data is a bit faster than it was back then. Meetings no longer have to be face to face. Hell, I just met with a group in India last week via teleconference, on short notice, because they thought a server MIGHT be having issues.
I'm sure a bit of this is just being a butt-hurt fan, but from the outside, as someone who's followed this for the last few weeks, this seems like a cluster**** of pure evil.