So is Fila and FUBU
But being UA's "signature" brand would be pretty awesome also. I agree I would take Nike all day long but I will be happy with UA. Just as long as Adidas is out of the picture I'm good.ND/Jordan > anything UA can possibly design
Am I the only one that likes Adidas? I don't think anyone really appreciates the positives they bring to the table. Sure Nike and Under Armor stuff look nice and are "flashy", but they all. look. the. same. Especially Nike. You know the difference between UGA football shirts and Alabama football shirts? The color. That's it. They all say the same thing (except the school name), they all have the same block font, they all have the same styles, they are the exact same shirts.
Adidas actually makes unique shirts that are different between schools. Tennessee shirts look nothing like ND shirts, which look nothing like Michigan shirts, and I always really appreciated that.
I'm going to feel stupid if this was already mentioned somewhere, but I have it from an inside source that Nike wants to make us their "Jordan" product of College Football. I.e. huge marketing campaign, yearly unique designs, all of it.
Would be a big mistake to turn down Nike if we leave Adidas IMO.
For another point supporting UA being the 'it' brand right now, UA's stock has risen from roughly $50 a share to ~$83 over the past year. In the same time span, Nike has increased from roughly $52 a share to ~$76. Quite the disparity in growth there. Just pointing it out. I would enjoy seeing a market plan and presentation from Nike though, just so see what they have in mind.
For another point supporting UA being the 'it' brand right now, UA's stock has risen from roughly $50 a share to ~$83 over the past year. In the same time span, Nike has increased from roughly $52 a share to ~$76. Quite the disparity in growth there. Just pointing it out. I would enjoy seeing a market plan and presentation from Nike though, just so see what they have in mind.
All the info that came out today was accurate. UA is the favorite and it's down to UA or Nike.
I don't care how much money UA offers, we can't turn down Nike IMO. Superior brand and their willingness to make us their centerpiece is too valuable.
You don't think ND wouldn't be the centerpiece for UA? UA would have us plastered everywhere, just like Nike. If the gold shoes are an interesting idea to Jack and Brian, there's nothing that says UA can't make them.
The difference is that the "centerpiece" of Nike is a much more prominent pace than the "centerpiece" of UA. It's a $24B company versus a $2B company.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III using Tapatalk 4
While I agree with the sentiment, I cannot see how we will ever surpass Oregon as Nike's "centerpiece," unless it is Phil Knight that actually donates all the uniforms and equipment etc.
Maryland is already UA's "Oregon". The founder is a Terp alum no?
IDK that. I really just don't like UAs uniforms, especially Maryland's unis recently.
The difference is that the "centerpiece" of Nike is a much more prominent pace than the "centerpiece" of UA. It's a $24B company versus a $2B company.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III using Tapatalk 4
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
While I agree with the sentiment, I cannot see how we will ever surpass Oregon as Nike's "centerpiece," unless it is Phil Knight that actually donates all the uniforms and equipment etc.
While I am excited at the possibility of ND being Nike's college flagship...
Unless Nike wants to put obligations in writing do we really believe this sales pitch or is this just the same thing they told USC, Alabama, Texas, etc?
I read the rumors of ND receiving the Jordan-like branding from Nike. If that is the opportunity out there, then by all means go for it. If it is not that exclusive, then we become another one of Nike's many schools.
With UA we instantly become their centerpiece.
Love it...That would be pretty damn cool IMO, but it would also be one more feather in the cap of ND bashers - I could see it being ammo for saying that ND is so elitest they "demand their own clothing brand" within a company.
While I agree with the sentiment, I cannot see how we will ever surpass Oregon as Nike's "centerpiece," unless it is Phil Knight that actually donates all the uniforms and equipment etc.
Maryland is already UA's "Oregon". The founder is a Terp alum no?
That's totally misleading for so many reasons.
3. I'm not sure if the Class of 2015 at Booker T. Washington or JP2 consult the capital markets to determine what the "it" brand is. I'm guessing it's much more important what Dwayne Wade, Calvin Johnson, and Jay Z are wearing and talking about. Consulting the market is fine for evaluating the company, but evaluating the brand is something else entirely.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III using Tapatalk 4