woolybug25
#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
- Messages
- 17,677
- Reaction score
- 3,018
shrinkage
![]()
cam is our leading rusher. you dont see him as an incumbent starter based on productivity?
this is a tad rhetorical because i think TF, at this point, can overtake everyone we have--and GB--if stays and healthy, can push for 8-10 carries out of the gate.
Like most here, I'm in agreement that we move Carlisle to the slot next year (he can still get a carry or two a game from there), and push GA back to a the role he had last year where he gets 3-6 carries a game and hopefully breaks a big one every once in a while. Folston/Bryant should be splitting carries ideally, and Cam gets his carries when a back is dinged up or late in a game.
Which I think is why Cam is a great garbage time RB and is more than serviceable in a pinch. He'll get the job done at the times when you don't want to risk your starters, which is pretty valuable.
I feel like we've all had this discussion a thousand times, but based on what we've seen this year from Folston, I don't think its realistic to say that he'd start and Folston would have to split carries behind him. Cam is our Tommy Rees at running back, minus the maddening interceptions. He does everything right, and gets the job done, but doesn't have that special something that separates 'solid' or 'good' players from championship players.
Folston at the very least has the potential to be something Cam isn't. He looked like it against Navy. Has Cam McDaniel ever been that dynamic? Simply put, as much as everyone loves Cam McDaniel, you're kidding yourself if you don't realize that Folston is very, very likely to be a better player.
\cam is our leading rusher. you dont see him as an incumbent starter based on productivity?
this is a tad rhetorical because i think TF, at this point, can overtake everyone we have--and GB--if stays and healthy, can push for 8-10 carries out of the gate.
I think a lot of them aren’t “names” now because they went to SC and got lost in the shuffle but all of these guys were high four stars or higher, in fact I think most of them were five stars… and while I can’t tell you which class they were all from I’m pretty sure almost all of these guys were on the roster at around the same time, meaning all within a four-five year cycle, competing against each other… starting right AFTER they got done with Bush and White for crying out loud... just a sick run of talent at RB... AND I may have forgotten some...
Stafon Johnson
Kenny Ashley
Emmanuel Moody
Stanley Havili
Joe McKnight
Chauncey Washington
Marc Tyler
Dillon Baxter
Soma Vainuku
now while our backs are better than most teams EVER dream of having, they don't live up to the above, which is a REAL hard run to live up to in fairness.
shrinkage
![]()
Fify
So has something changed here to increase the talks of the naked lap, or are we just spinning our wheels here?
We just spin our wheels about 95% of the time to begin with... right?
Did he go to oaks with Jimmy?I grew up with Marc Tyler...funny story, I ran into him over a Christmas break one year I believe after what would've been his RS Soph year and he said that if he could've done it all over again, that he would've been Irish along with Jimmy. I don't know whether he was just saying that because I went to ND because I'm not sure how we could compete with the "University of Sexual Ballers"...
![]()
Did he go to oaks with Jimmy?
Yes, Jimmy was ESPNs cover boy and "prospect of the decade" when all assumed he was going to SC... once he verballed to ND the song was, "Eh he plays really poor competition at his high school, ND is overrating him with this decade talk (that we started)." They then knocked their 'once a generation prospect' down out of the top five for that YEAR and came up with a new #1 overall prosepct... that prospect was Jimmy's very own teammate... Marc Tyler.
I have great hopes, based on at least SOME vague "data", that Greg Bryant will be a terrific RB and be ready for all that next season with no problems. Bryant was early in his remarks of the importance of him BLOCKING well. That tells me what I need to know about whether he'll be fully prepared.
I also agree that Folston seems to be the real deal. Whether it has been service academies or not, you can tell something about jump-and-wiggle in the hole regardless, plus as soon as he's back planted on the ground, he's in power mode. ... and how long has it been since we had an effective jump-over-everyone-into-the-endzone back?
But for those who continue to degrade the playing value of Cam McDaniel, two words: ROCKY BLEIER. Obviously a bum, eh? No eye test for him right? Just do everything right, lay everything you've got on the field, ... and just win, baby.
I have great hopes, based on at least SOME vague "data", that Greg Bryant will be a terrific RB and be ready for all that next season with no problems. Bryant was early in his remarks of the importance of him BLOCKING well. That tells me what I need to know about whether he'll be fully prepared.
I also agree that Folston seems to be the real deal. Whether it has been service academies or not, you can tell something about jump-and-wiggle in the hole regardless, plus as soon as he's back planted on the ground, he's in power mode. ... and how long has it been since we had an effective jump-over-everyone-into-the-endzone back?
But for those who continue to degrade the playing value of Cam McDaniel, two words: ROCKY BLEIER. Obviously a bum, eh? No eye test for him right? Just do everything right, lay everything you've got on the field, ... and just win, baby.
I love the comparison and somewhat valid too as Cam usually goes through the center of the line. For those of you too young to remember, and I am guessing that is a good portion of you as the 1970's were a ways back anymore, Rocky was no where near a race around end kind of runner. The Steelers had Franco Harris for that.
I have great hopes, based on at least SOME vague "data", that Greg Bryant will be a terrific RB and be ready for all that next season with no problems. Bryant was early in his remarks of the importance of him BLOCKING well. That tells me what I need to know about whether he'll be fully prepared.
I also agree that Folston seems to be the real deal. Whether it has been service academies or not, you can tell something about jump-and-wiggle in the hole regardless, plus as soon as he's back planted on the ground, he's in power mode. ... and how long has it been since we had an effective jump-over-everyone-into-the-endzone back?
But for those who continue to degrade the playing value of Cam McDaniel, two words: ROCKY BLEIER. Obviously a bum, eh? No eye test for him right? Just do everything right, lay everything you've got on the field, ... and just win, baby.
Rocky is perhaps my favorite ND graduate who happened to play football. A shining example of the "Notre Dame Man."