Right ... as will McKenzie, we hope.
We wouldn't take Muhammad as a commit until he qualified, and he didn't qualify until after NSD. So he signed with Miami. He did end up qualifiying, much to some ND fans' chagrin.
I can't tell if you are arguing with me or not, but, if you are, my point is that, until I saw the new info that Loy came forward with today, I thought that BGI was not listing McKenzie as a commit because he didn't have an SAT score yet, and I thought that was silly; BGI has no problem listing Tillery or other juniors as commits (Martini was immediately listed as well after he committed in the summer after his sophomore year) so what's the issue. Now I realize that McKenzie DOES have an SAT score on file, but his academic issues are such that he does not meet NCAA standards. At least, that is what Loy is saying today. So, now I've changed my opinion on this; we wouldn't accept AQM's verbal under similar circumstances, so I'm not sure we should accept McKenzie's.
Some people are saying that the staff has indeed accepted McKenzie's verbal, but I am now a little skeptical of that. Again, the staff wouldn't accept AQM's; why would they accept McKenzie's?
Not arguing with you at all just noting the time frame. The recruiting services have listed recuits with incomplete academic credentials since they were founded. I've been following academic "stats" for two decades. When Mike Frank worked for a mortgage broker in Nebraska and "recruiting" was a passion for him and not an occupation, I suggested he and smitty zero in on GPA's, core courses, and test scores to separate the wheat from the chaff. It didn't matter if recruits were "qualified by the NCAA. What was important was were the "qualified" by ND Admissions. Back then if a recruit didn't get Admissions approval there was no offer. Holtz pushed that policy and lost. It has since been changed from a timeline perspective but Admissions still says "Yea or Nay" for every recruit.
BTW, Mike Frank, Allan Wallace, and the guy that started IrishEyes on the Internet took my suggestion and pursued the "real" academic level of recruits. They quickly had to cut back or stop though as they got negative feedback from recruits who did not want to discuss GPA, Test Scores, nor classwork. "Why don't you ask me about my last game?" Generally those with a 3.0 and a 24 ACT weren't shy about discussing academics. Those with a 2.0 and an "D" in Algebra I, changed the subject and/or stopped taking their calls.
In the "New Poster" thread a day or two ago, we discussed a rumor of JUCOs at ND in two years. I explained in detail why I didn't see that possible with the history of ND Admission policies and pursuit of academic excellence. It was a good discussion with a number of posters and perspectives participating.
Muhammad eventually got NCAA approval and met Miami's requirements. He may have eventually met ND's requirements as well but I doubt it. ND's are tougher.
Fans have complained about the number of 5 star recruits ND has "gotten" and "lost" in the past 2-3 years. Kelly is doggedly pursing talented athletes with lesser academic credentials. The objective is to get them to focus on HS academics to raise their credentials AND their ability as a student to compete successfully in ND's academic. I'm guessing that recruit's like McKenzie are telling the coaches of academic progress (as did some of those who flipped or chose another school at the last minute). That would encourage the coaches to continue to invest their time. But there has to be documented progress, test score, improved grades, etc. for Admissions to grant an O.K.
I doubt Loy has a grasp of ND Admissions and ND academics. It's not the NCAA minimums that he's familiar with at UNC.