This Sorority Girl Is NOT Happy

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
if she doesn't care enough to shave the pits what makes you think she is taking care of other grooming habits down there????

Side note: I have a friend that prefers a luscious bottom on his ladies. Always said the hairier the better. Even said that he didn't care if it went up to their belly button.

He's a ginger though... they're mutated geneology makes them do bad things.
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
Side note: I have a friend that prefers a luscious bottom on his ladies. Always said the hairier the better. Even said that he didn't care if it went up to their belly button.

He's a ginger though... they're mutated geneology makes them do bad things.

im rolling in laughter....he is one sick f$ck though....man i better not come up w/ hairs flossing my teeth...side note:gingers are said to be extinct in 100 years
Gingers extinct in 100 years, say scientists | News.com.au
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
This thread is going places. Probably terrible places, but places nonetheless.

76tVwoI.gif
 

T Town Tommy

Alabama Bag Man
Messages
6,278
Reaction score
2,768

Personally, I think she's a slider. And who wants a dam* workout while having sex? As far as where she hits on the hammer scale:

7.0 when I was 19 years old
8.0 when I was 30 years old
8.5 when I was 40 years old
9.0 at my current 46 years of age


To all you young pukes out here... see a pattern? Yep... it's what you got to look forward to in life. Accept it as fate and move on.

And to all those in the over 40 range... quit your dam* lying. You'd hit it and have the pics to prove it to your buddies. You ain't foolin anyone here.
 

Damion704

ND Lead Negotiator
Messages
570
Reaction score
17
Here's how I scale things. And frankly it's the way most guys I know scale. Some things to keep in mind:

1. You can't include most celebrities, porn stars, and anyone else who has ever appeared in a magazine on the scale. Totally skews the numbers because they are all hot. So the scale is limited to normal people.

2. Have to define the scale. Is it local or national? Since we are all from different areas of the country, have to use a national scale on this site.

3. If you haven't ever lived in another part of the country, you are probably going to scale on a local level whether you intend to or not. So keep that in mind. Somebody from California is going to have higher standards than someone from Pennsylvania. Vacation doesn't count.

So here's my scale (I've lived in the Midwest, Northeast and Greece/Italy for extended time periods)

9.5-10: No doubters. No physical flaws. Perfect body and a face that's at least in the upper 10% of women. Only about 1-3% of women fit this bill.

8-9.5: Very hot girls. Face is in the top 25%. Body is very good and likely not overweight at all. May have minor issues such as smaller breasts (although some men like that), a small mole, or are shorter/taller than the median. About 15-20% of women should fall in this range. These are girls you would absolutely have no hesitation dating and showing off to your friends.

6-7.5: Average to Above Average: Nothing spectacular about the girl, but nothing bothersome either. May lack in one area but excel in another. This also covers girls with very nice faces but less than stellar bodies. About 30-35% of girls fall in this range. You wouldn't brag about this girl's looks if she was your girlfriend but you wouldn't get ragged on either. Most guys will marry a girl like this as having a wife in the higher ranges creates other problems.

4.5-5.5: Girls with average bodies but a below average face. Or girls that are moderately overweight but are naturally pretty. About 30-35% of women fall in this range. Wouldn't hook up with this girl unless drunk and she grabs your junk or if she becomes a Mermaid.

<4.5: Reserved for girls with clear weight problems and girls you wouldn't hook up with under any circumstance. Bad teeth, excessively hairy arms, etc. All these girls get lumped into this category and it's not really worth defining further. 10-15% of women here.
PERFECT
 

nlroma1o

Well-known member
Messages
2,077
Reaction score
95
Here's how I scale things. And frankly it's the way most guys I know scale. Some things to keep in mind:

1. You can't include most celebrities, porn stars, and anyone else who has ever appeared in a magazine on the scale. Totally skews the numbers because they are all hot. So the scale is limited to normal people.

2. Have to define the scale. Is it local or national? Since we are all from different areas of the country, have to use a national scale on this site.

3. If you haven't ever lived in another part of the country, you are probably going to scale on a local level whether you intend to or not. So keep that in mind. Somebody from California is going to have higher standards than someone from Pennsylvania. Vacation doesn't count.

So here's my scale (I've lived in the Midwest, Northeast and Greece/Italy for extended time periods)

9.5-10: No doubters. No physical flaws. Perfect body and a face that's at least in the upper 10% of women. Only about 1-3% of women fit this bill.

8-9.5: Very hot girls. Face is in the top 25%. Body is very good and likely not overweight at all. May have minor issues such as smaller breasts (although some men like that), a small mole, or are shorter/taller than the median. About 15-20% of women should fall in this range. These are girls you would absolutely have no hesitation dating and showing off to your friends.

6-7.5: Average to Above Average: Nothing spectacular about the girl, but nothing bothersome either. May lack in one area but excel in another. This also covers girls with very nice faces but less than stellar bodies. About 30-35% of girls fall in this range. You wouldn't brag about this girl's looks if she was your girlfriend but you wouldn't get ragged on either. Most guys will marry a girl like this as having a wife in the higher ranges creates other problems.

4.5-5.5: Girls with average bodies but a below average face. Or girls that are moderately overweight but are naturally pretty. About 30-35% of women fall in this range. Wouldn't hook up with this girl unless drunk and she grabs your junk or if she becomes a Mermaid.

<4.5: Reserved for girls with clear weight problems and girls you wouldn't hook up with under any circumstance. Bad teeth, excessively hairy arms, etc. All these girls get lumped into this category and it's not really worth defining further. 10-15% of women here.

Bingo!!! This rating scale should be published for all men to study at a young age, so that there isn't pointless in fighting. I see you did you research with the accurate percentages and what not. lol
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,584
Reaction score
20,035
Personally, I think she's a slider. And who wants a dam* workout while having sex? As far as where she hits on the hammer scale:

7.0 when I was 19 years old
8.0 when I was 30 years old
8.5 when I was 40 years old
9.0 at my current 46 years of age


To all you young pukes out here... see a pattern? Yep... it's what you got to look forward to in life. Accept it as fate and move on.

And to all those in the over 40 range... quit your dam* lying. You'd hit it and have the pics to prove it to your buddies. You ain't foolin anyone here.

I just turned 61, but I still have my standards. She's still a 6.5-7 in my book, but I didn't say I wouldn't do her. Hell I'd probably do a 4 with enough liquor.
 

dshans

They call me The Dribbler
Messages
9,624
Reaction score
1,181
He's a ginger though... they're mutated geneology makes them do bad things.

Gingers extinct in 100 years, say scientists.

Enough already with the Ginger hate!!! You're ragging on a good part of my extended family and my son in particular!

I was something of a Ginger as a kid; I think the term used was strawberry blonde. Then the family moved to Florida, I got a crew cut and I spent a lot of time in the sun, salt water and chlorinated water. By high school my hair was translucent. Then I moved to Minnesota and got older. Red has given way to gray and white.

GINGER RULZ!!!!
 
C

Cackalacky

Guest
I apologize guys.

BTW That girl is a 6-7. Don't take it personally girl.
 

felkey72

New member
Messages
230
Reaction score
11
Shes alot better looking in the pixelated picture. I guess thats explains some of the mistakes my college days.
 

rikkitikki08

Well-known member
Messages
4,261
Reaction score
3,090
She is a 7 which in my eyes is very hit it worthy. Also with out a doubt this is my nominee for thread of the year. COMEDY ON TOP OF COMEDY
 

felkey72

New member
Messages
230
Reaction score
11
she is def an 6 maybe 6.5 with the body of an 8. Too many people give out 10s and 9s way to often. I think i have seen one or two 10s in my lifetime (in real life mind you). That doesnt take a way the fact that i would hit it because i def would, might just have to turn it around like someone already mentioned
 
Top