'14 CO ATH Nathan Starks (UCLA Verbal)

Rack Em

Community Bod
Messages
7,089
Reaction score
2,727
ty...exactly what i was thing of why even talk to the guy if there isn't some chance...it may not be public knowledge but it could be complete x,y,z and then see what we can do on our end

Honestly, with the way recruits talk about Alford I could see him stay in touch just to mentor Starks. He's that type of guy.
 

STLDomer

Schmitty
Messages
9,426
Reaction score
549
I assumed Alford was just staying in contact because that's the guy he is also. Unlike whoever was his recruiter at USC, they just stopped talking to him the minute the news came out.

EDIT: it sounds like he talks to USC but not very much compared to OU & ND. Not "regular contact"
 
Last edited:

Irish Man3

Well-known member
Messages
6,582
Reaction score
949
He will be Irish, oh yes he will be Irish!

Reminds me of a weak Barry Sanders...
 

GoIrish41

Paterfamilius
Messages
9,929
Reaction score
2,119
If we are taking 23 or 24 guys like has been reported, Starks should be one of them IMO. Just another in a rapidly improving stable of backs wearing a gold helmet.
 

Son of Kenmare

Active member
Messages
212
Reaction score
50
Given the fact that Starks has a close friend within the Notre Dame family, it just makes sense that the staff would keep in touch and hopefully serve as a positive influence with this kid even as other programs/people burn their bridges.
 

NDWorld247

New member
Messages
2,474
Reaction score
302
Honestly, with the way recruits talk about Alford I could see him stay in touch just to mentor Starks. He's that type of guy.

I assumed Alford was just staying in contact because that's the guy he is also.

IIRC, Starks said as much in a May interview about Alford. I don't doubt Alford's heart, character or motives, but he's also no dummy.

My guess is Starks will commit to Oklahoma at some point before his season ends, but his recruitment will not be over until ND says it's over.
 

rikkitikki08

Well-known member
Messages
4,261
Reaction score
3,090
Whats the word on this kid? I haven't heard much about his recruitment as of late
 

rikkitikki08

Well-known member
Messages
4,261
Reaction score
3,090
Did he ever find a high school to play ball at? His recruitment has been extremely quiet as of late which usually isn't a good sign
 
Messages
666
Reaction score
84
Man without a country

Man without a country

Did he ever find a high school to play ball at? His recruitment has been extremely quiet as of late which usually isn't a good sign

Starks intended to transfer from Gorman to a school in Denver, Colorado, Cherry Hills. But there is still the question of eligibility in Colorado, because of the Gorman dismissal. Oklahoma is maintaining contact with Nathan.
 

dwshade

Banned
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
123
As I understand it Alford continues to mentor the kid because that's who Alford is. But ND admissions would never admit him.
 

Big23Head

Well-known member
Messages
3,635
Reaction score
318
Starks intended to transfer from Gorman to a school in Denver, Colorado, Cherry Hills. But there is still the question of eligibility in Colorado, because of the Gorman dismissal. Oklahoma is maintaining contact with Nathan.

He's still waiting to hear, he had to resubmit the information
 
Last edited:

STLDomer

Schmitty
Messages
9,426
Reaction score
549
Right now he's allowed to practice and work out with the team, just not play on Fridays
 

rikkitikki08

Well-known member
Messages
4,261
Reaction score
3,090
He got expelled from HS for some sort of drug violation. Notre Dame expels kids for the same thing. No way they allow him in when they boot current students for the same offense.

The name Michael Floyd ring any bells? ND does hold its self to higher standard but lets be realistic as well, if the kid has his act together and never has any other problems then I could see ND still making a push. Kids make mistakes and the coaching staff knows that
 

Kaneyoufeelit

Bowl Eligible
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
635
The name Michael Floyd ring any bells? ND does hold its self to higher standard but lets be realistic as well, if the kid has his act together and never has any other problems then I could see ND still making a push. Kids make mistakes and the coaching staff knows that

Floyd was already a part of the ND family. There is a major difference between giving a second chance to a guy who you have invested something in and who has built a reputation and inviting a kid with a major red flag into the group. I'm not saying Starks is necessarily a bad kid but there is no reason to take the chance when you can painlessly walk away.

Also, there is a difference between a DUI and selling drugs.

But, the best reason not a take a chance here is highlighted by TP

He is just toxic right now. In the article he did not say he was being recruited by ND. There are plenty of reasons to not take Starks or another rb. Its a numbers game and ND is winning that right now at RB. No reason to pull away from strategy

We don't have a need for this kid so where is the incentive to take the chance? If he played ILB it might be a different story. Kind of joking about that
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
Selling ecstasy is not the way to get admitted into ND.

1) We don't know that this is what happened.

2) "Selling ecstasy" does not mean he was on some street corner a la The Wire dealing, he could very well have been giving it to friends (in the high Law Vegas HS circle). That happens in nearly every high school in America, especially the rich ones.
 

NDhoosier

Well-known member
Messages
2,706
Reaction score
346
2) "Selling ecstasy" does not mean he was on some street corner a la The Wire dealing, he could very well have been giving it to friends (in the high Law Vegas HS circle). That happens in nearly every high school in America, especially the rich ones.

How is that better? Selling drugs is selling drugs. Same charge. Selling drugs is always a risky business, lots of violence when drugs are involved; where do you think he gets those drugs to sell? If he is doing this stuff in high school under plenty of supervision, what will he do when he is out on his own.

IF this is true about him selling drugs, that is a very serious red flag and I want no part of it.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
How is that better? Selling drugs is selling drugs. Same charge. Selling drugs is always a risky business, lots of violence when drugs are involved; where do you think he gets those drugs to sell? If he is doing this stuff in high school under plenty of supervision, what will he do when he is out on his own.

IF this is true about him selling drugs, that is a very serious red flag and I want no part of it.

Except that's not correct.

There is a huge difference between this:

drug--300x300.jpg


and this:

Party-goers+Claim+Raves+&+Drugs+Are+Not+Linked.png


and this:

teens-smoking-weed.jpg


If you can't recognize the difference, you need to ignore what your policy academy taught you.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
Not in ND's eyes it doesn't.

I'm sure it does matter, if it even gets that far. They aren't stupid.

I know 0% about his situation, so I won't pretend like I do. But there's a HUGE difference between a guy slinging dope on a street corner and wealthy high school kids being immature/experimenting with drugs. One launders money, kills people systematically, and generally sends you to prison for a stint to two or ten; the other is not even uncommon and certainly isn't the variable that makes someone a loser. I'd bet any amount of money Alford (and anyone with a brain) sees it that way too. Will ND admissions see it that way? I'm sure they're cognizant of it too, but that doesn't mean it will prevent the rejection. I think that's a fair way of stating it.
 
K

koonja

Guest
I'm sure it does matter, if it even gets that far. They aren't stupid.

I know 0% about his situation, so I won't pretend like I do. But there's a HUGE difference between a guy slinging dope on a street corner and wealthy high school kids being immature/experimenting with drugs. One launders money, kills people systematically, and generally sends you to prison for a stint to two or ten; the other is not even uncommon and certainly isn't the variable that makes someone a loser. I'd bet any amount of money Alford (and anyone with a brain) sees it that way too. Will ND admissions see it that way? I'm sure they're cognizant of it too, but that doesn't mean it will prevent the rejection. I think that's a fair way of stating it.

I've agreed 100% with Buster's perspective on this matter ever since the 'incident' came to light.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
I'm sure it does matter, if it even gets that far. They aren't stupid.

I know 0% about his situation, so I won't pretend like I do. But there's a HUGE difference between a guy slinging dope on a street corner and wealthy high school kids being immature/experimenting with drugs. One launders money, kills people systematically, and generally sends you to prison for a stint to two or ten; the other is not even uncommon and certainly isn't the variable that makes someone a loser. I'd bet any amount of money Alford (and anyone with a brain) sees it that way too. Will ND admissions see it that way? I'm sure they're cognizant of it too, but that doesn't mean it will prevent the rejection. I think that's a fair way of stating it.

And both are criminal offenses.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
And both are criminal offenses.

So is underage drinking, I'll bet you did that. In my state it's an M1 too, i.e. just shy of a felony. Every kid whose ever had an underage should be labeled scum of the earth and a menace to society.
 
Top