Ask and you shall receive. I had some free time last night so i threw this bad boy together, hope you guys enjoy.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/39y4b_HH1F4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Nice Job, Gattica!
1) When I watched the Michigan highlights, into Stanford, I thought to myself, an offense could be designed like this around Tommy;
a) with decent running and blocking it could do well.
b) with the number of receivers that can highpoint the ball, even better.
2) Tommy didn't look nearly as slow or weak last year as the year before. Part of Tommy's problem USC, Stanford and FSU (all '11) could have been the offensive line. The whole line was weaker, simply. And that little extra time they provided last year had to help. Hopefully they will be seven pillars this year!
3) From front to back, oldest to newest, Tommy's release looks faster to me.
Two questions:
A) In the BYU game especially how come on every reception (over ten yards) has the receiver with his back turned to the end zone, facing Tommy? Does this explain some of our red zone problems? How does one correct this? It cannot all be weak Tommy-arm, can it?
B) As I stated earlier, I think Tommy's release may be faster (what do I know?). Is that a function of knowing the offense better? Being able to read the defenses better? Or the fact that teams didn't plan a disguised defense to dismember Tommy as he was not the projected starter?
I am also confused when I hear statements like "Tommy has an exceptional knowledge of the offense", and "Tommy gets confused by reading defensive coverages." I don't see a problem with both being true, is that correct?
