Maybe I misunderstood this story, but I don't recall an issue being made about what language he speaks. You can be "legal" and not speak English, or "illegal" and speak perfect English. The two concepts are not related.
Sorry but when if I were ever to move to another country for whatever reason I would make it my business to learn the language...most people would (or at least I would hope). I fell and this is only my opinion which I am fully entitled to, that my family and ancestors (extended family) had a hand in shaping and sacrificed lives in the service for the United States of America. This country was founded on Christian beleifs, with English as it's language, the acceptance of other beliefs and nationalities was paramount in making the USA a better place. Where things get lost is that the acceptance of beleifs and nationalities should not be mistaken for come on over and we'll adjust the country for whatever you need. Again this is just my opinion I never bash people for their opinion so don't tread on mine.What does this "entitlement" entail and why does it offend you so much though? As stated succinctly above, the United States does not have an official language and I, for one, am not of the mind that we necessarily need to establish one.
Also, there's some irony in your statement that Spanish speakers in Florida have been catered to for so long, given that it was a Spanish colony for a long time before it became a state. Even more significantly, Puerto Ricans and some populations of Hispanics in the Southwest have roots that go back further than any English speaking settlers so...
Conversation was not with you don't need your two cents
don't tread on mine.
See, people in the south don't mind the wide gates as long as the person walks through them legally.
Stop watching MSNBC, and Rick....err....Racheal Maddow, it's rotting your brain. Come down to the south and check it out for yourself.
Hell, my in-laws are immigrants. But they did it the right and legal way.
Yet they get no respect. It's the illegal that is the "victim" somehow....
Sorry but when if I were ever to move to another country for whatever reason I would make it my business to learn the language...most people would (or at least I would hope). I fell and this is only my opinion which I am fully entitled to, that my family and ancestors (extended family) had a hand in shaping and sacrificed lives in the service for the United States of America. This country was founded on Christian beleifs, with English as it's language, the acceptance of other beliefs and nationalities was paramount in making the USA a better place. Where things get lost is that the acceptance of beleifs and nationalities should not be mistaken for come on over and we'll adjust the country for whatever you need. Again this is just my opinion I never bash people for their opinion so don't tread on mine.
I am also interested in finding out where along the Canadian border or the Alaskan border with Russia, the imigrationists are interested in building a fence. Oh, their not. That must mean the fence is an effort directed by racists for racists.
I work with TONS of immigrants. And what you're saying is complete bullsh!t, and generated by nothing but hate.
i teach students whose parents work jobs that 'Americans' won't work, who work 2-3 jobs so that their children can get a private education, who are 10 times the parents that are raising rich suburban brats who are given every opportunity to succeed and end up being 30 year-old losers smoking weed all day living off of mommy and daddy. These parents that I work with are everything that is right in this country, and your blind hatred is everything that is wrong.
Now, there are problems with the way the border is being handled and there are problems with letting too many immigrants in. And there are definitely immigrants that come here that do NOT contribute to this society. I am personally not blind to those problems. But guess what...there are plenty of white, full-blooded 'Americans' that aren't contributing to society neither, playing video games, eating marijuana mushrooms and eating Ding-Dongs while collecting unemployment and living at home with mommy. F*ck any immigrant not trying to contribute to our society and fu*k every non-immigrant leeching off our government. See, the problem goes a lot deeper than immigrants...
Conversation was not with you don't need your two cents
You're kidding me, right?
Canadians aren't trying to sneak into this country by the truckload. They are a first-world country, Mexico is a third-world country.
NDinLA, Bluto, Buster and BobD with a string of great posts. Just when I had started to give up hope on these "off-topic" threads.
Reps all around.
I have good experiences with lawyers every day. So do all of our clients. What does ROI have to do with what kind of people lawyers are? Out of curiosity, what do you do for a living?
If it is a private conversation, go to PM. Otherwise, the conversations are open universe, friend.
If the founding fathers were ever made aware of how tea party lunatics have stolen and bastardized their legacy they would lose their lunch.
The Tea Party. The front for Rich old White men with money. The Tea Party is easy, and they are funny, random little people. They want to use guys like John Adams for their law and order vendetta's and streamlining of the judicial process until it moves at lynch mob speeds. The same John Adams that successfully defended all of the British troops that took part in the Boston Massacere. The same John Adams that said "It would be better to let a hundred guilty men free that to convict one innocent man."
It is so funny how you have all these freshmen congressmen who's appeal was small government, lower spending, now they are all voting to kill habeus corpus, and reduce police and fire service.
Why is the federal government involved in police and fire service? You are correct that they are appealling to smaller government and lower spending. These Congressmen are working the FEDERAL end of the ledger which does not mean that they don't want states and municipalities to provide these same services. What the hell are the feds doing deciding how police and fire service are done? That is just as local of an issue as education, of which the Department of Education would be very high on my list of federal agencies to axe.
Very dishonest argument to say promoting a reduced federal influence in something is equal to being against that service on any level.
As for John Adams, how would he feel about having the highest incarceration rate in the developed world?
Sorry for offending you. Please don't sue me for slandering your noble profession. There is nothing I could do for a living that could ever live up to your standards so I will refrain from sharing.
Let's just say I work in a profession that has little public trust and rightfully so. People deserve better than what they get and are frequently screwed over by greed or stupidity or both, and can't tell the difference until it is too late. I get irrate cleaning up these cases of abuse where, in practice, it is most productive to sweep up the mess and move on rather than make the jerks pay for abuse. I am highly regulated and it does nothing if anything to clean up the morons and crooks that in some cases destroy people's lives. In a just world, there would be a process for making claims but, as a lawyer, you should be well aware that life is not fair.
1) ROI will show you many lawyers are put in a sh!t financial position, thus encouraging the chasing of ambulances and reducing their ability to choose cases with their moral compass as their guide. See the law school thread if you want the stats on that.
1A) The motivation of many lawyers is the thrill of the competition and they want to win at all costs. A little pine tar, pitching inside, corking the bat, HGH.... very easy to validate to maintain that which you hold most dear. Lawyers, like all humans, find a lot of ways to validate inhumane behavior.
2) You can always find a lawyer willing to facilitate an irrational a-hole hellbent on mutual destruction.
3) If Law were nearly as black and white as lawyers and TV make people believe, we wouldn't need lawyers, our three years to resolve pretty much anything.
You don't know **** about me or what I came from
Your Justin Tuck of the NY Giants. You came from ND and played HS ball in Alabama. GKI, you can't hide behind a screen name, we all know who you are!
Reps, Fbolt. Made me laugh.
GK - You say you are a lawyer, which (to me) means you phrase questions hiding your motives for a living. Your question was passive aggressive and I choose not to further your "agenda" even if it is only harmless internet message board banter. As I would expect of a lawyer, you get very upset when someone does not provide what you are asking for, as if you entitled to information just because the question crosses your mind? Take a dose of humility and pass it around the office, and the law school reunion while you are at it.
Bogtrotter - WTF with the teacher tangent and Tea Party hate? Are you saying government is not big enough? There is no validity to the concept of reducing the size of government? I missed the part of your local dispute discussion where the teachers took a pay cut? Can't carry over or cash out sick days? Join the rest of the world! Congratulations, your school district is successful and pay below average for this, thus a high efficiency rating. So sorry you elected board members who were not union stooges for a change and they proactively took action to deal with a projected deficit and improve the finances of the district. As far as Ohio teacher pay, maybe you can enlighten us as far as what average pay and benefits look like and what you think a "fair" wage is to attract and retain the top quality teachers you desire (which you apparently have already attracted and retained given your school's high ranking). I would further submit you have neighbors without kids or paying for their own private school that think you should pay for your own kids schooling if it is so damn important to you and that they haven't seen any teacher's starving in the streets or an inability to fill open positions because you don't offer a competitive wage.
I wonder if this story will spark any debate/discussion? I'm going with Yes. The California Bar says he should not be kept from getting his license.
“ … Mr. Garcia’s status in the United States, should not, ipso facto, be grounds for excluding him from law licensure. He has met all of the prescribed qualifications and there is no reason to believe he cannot take the oath and faithfully uphold his duties as an attorney,” the bar said.
California bar: Illegal immigrant should get law license - U.S. News
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are kidding right? Lawyers as moral and just protectors of the innocent? You obviously have never been involved in any type of dispute that needed one.
But yes, I don't fault this guy for what he is trying to do. I don't even know what the options are for someone who was raised here and brought here illegally to gain citizenship or a legal visa, but I am sure it a long, complicated and expensive process.
I don't see a problem with it. This guy is going through the process of getting a visa to work here as a permanent resident; it just hasn't been finalized yet. He has passed the bar and stayed out of trouble. He has proven that he has the knowledge, skill and character to practice law. Why shouldn't we at least certify him as having that knowledge, skill and character? Doesn't mean he'll be able to get paid for his work until he gets his papers in order, but why withhold the certification? It has nothing to do with anything other than being capable of practicing law. If he wants to do that for free, let him go ahead.
No I am not the one to miss the point. The average mid-career teacher was asked give up over $50,000 worth of earned pay, (in accumulated sick time) and never receive a pay raise for the remainder of their career. Which of course means with the true inflation rate, they would be working for 40% of what they are today, when they retired. You can look up pay for Ohio teachers and find the Median, and guess that we are talking below that. You take this deal, (50k forfeiture, and 40% wage reduction) because I am pretty sure unless you shovel shiit in Louisiana; you probably have the ability to do better. QUOTE]
The point of sick pay is to use it if you are sick. If not sick you don't use it and you lose it. Most places are moving to PTO with a few days available to carry over per year, use it or lose it. Find me anywhere in the private sector where you can accumulate that much PTO, let alone sick leave. For NORMAL people you have Short Term Disability and then LTD kick in if you have that much need for paid time off, er... sick days. You know like all of the Wisconsin teachers that called in sick to march on Madison while private workers had to take PTO days to stay home with their kids that unexpectedly had no school. (good way to lose public support by the way)
Do they also get to stack this "sick" leave to look like salary in the year of retirement and juice their pension?
I also wonder if your pay freeze is a freeze in the pay matrix that has automatic increases for tenure and credentials (more than the rate of inflation in most states). You describe being stuck at the exact same salary forever, I highly doubt it and would love to see sources. CLASSIC union tactic is to push for pay raises acting like teachers don't already get a pay raise just for sticking around another year. Very similar to the Base Line Budgeting bull that manages to compound our spending problems even when there has been no federal budget for years.
$50K for nine months of work looks pretty darn good to a large chunk of the population out there, especially with pension and healthcare attached.
You did not answer the question of how much is "fair" or enough for teachers BTW. I believe $50K annual salary for an average teaching position in an average location is plenty fair and supply/demand metrics support my belief.