Jonathan G.
The jury is still out on Kelly. I don’t like
LSU’s chances of reaching the Playoff, or even coming close, this season, as its 96th-ranked defense still has to face
Ole Miss, Alabama, Texas A&M and, yes, Vanderbilt, all of whom are capable of putting up a bunch of points. And that will lead to much angst on the Bayou.
But this was always viewed as a bridge year to 2025, when the nation’s No. 1 QB, Bryce Underwood, arrives, and some of the current first- and second-year players LSU is having to play on defense get some experience. Also, Kelly has the continued support of athletic director Scott Woodward, the man who moved heaven and earth to get Kelly to Baton Rouge. Let’s check back on his status a year from now.
An eventual USC-Riley divorce feels more plausible. It’s proved to be a bad fit. And it’s not just the losses. Riley’s thin skin and defensiveness don’t play well in a pro market like L.A.
After the Minnesota game, he got snippy with a reporter who asked an innocuous question to fifth-year defensive end
Jamil Muhammad about a critical moment in the game, when officials initially ruled Gophers quarterback
Max Brosmer didn’t cross the goal line on his go-ahead QB sneak. Though not a major controversy, it fuels the skepticism that has been building since last season as to whether he’s up to the job.
In Riley’s case, current USC AD Jen Cohen did not hire Riley. That doesn’t mean she’s going to fire him if the Trojans go 7-5. She probably can’t, as it’s believed he has more than $80 million remaining on his original contract. USC does not have Texas A&M oil money. So like Kelly, I’d expect Riley back in 2025 unless he forms his exit plan. I’m less optimistic about 2026 and beyond.