Rockin’Irish
Hearing Impaired
- Messages
- 3,244
- Reaction score
- 2,507
The Coast To Coast Conference, CCCCal and Stanford going ACC? Those kids gonna have a bajillion frequent flyer miles
The Coast To Coast Conference, CCCCal and Stanford going ACC? Those kids gonna have a bajillion frequent flyer miles
Real dawg has sourcesJust when you thought you'd seen the worst of click-bait articles out there with last week's realignment craziness, this one comes along - Anyone have a subscription? I'm curious who this writer's source is (and I use the word writer loosely - I'm not even sure this is English?) EXCLUSIVE: Stanford and Notre Dame's to Join Big 10 Conference The article teaser reads: ”By the 2026 season both Stanford and Notre Dame will join the Big 10 Conference,” the source said. With those two universities joining the Big 10's expansion would likely be completed. Those moves coincided with the expiration is Notre Dame's football-exclusive TV contract with NBC.
This comment is interestingPony Excess to the ACC!
![]()
Sources: ACC considering SMU in addition to Cal and Stanford in expansion talks
At a meeting of league presidents on Tuesday, executives explored the possibility of adding Cal, Stanford and SMU, or only inviting the two Pac-12 members.sports.yahoo.com
As Yahoo Sports reported last week, the league (ACC) seriously explored adding five Pac-12 schools — Arizona, Arizona State, Utah, Cal and Stanford — before three of those five joined the Big 12.
The ND model is the only way forward: Football becomes independent and all other sports remain in their respective conferences. It's really that simple.
The ACC grabbing schools in California is a move of desperation and honestly, it's pretty ridiculous.
It's just so Big Ten, you know?The ACC grabbing schools in California is a move of desperation and honestly, it's pretty ridiculous.
It's just so Big Ten, you know?
Nothing better than staying up late to watch Utah or Washington State end USCs season.I have to admit I love the idea of SC joining the big in part to get away from Oregon only for Oregon to follow them,…
Idk how it will work but someone needs to make the late games the pac was great for continue to be a thing. I know it’ll be hard for Penn State to play a late start at Oregon but they have to work something out,…
As soon as these TV contracts start to dry up everything will go back to regionality because these schools won't be able to justify the travel expenses.I remember back in the day when ND, WVU, Penn State, FSU, Miami were all independent. Around the late 80s early 90s everyone started joining conferences. It all felt kind of weird.
In five years from now, I doubt any of this is even going to be an afterthought to anyone at that point. This idea that college football is going to fall apart only happens when the market and demand dry up. I just don't see that happening.
The Coast To Coast Conference, CCC
A smart CFB Tsar would
1)make the Top 48-60 schools independent
2) Mandate that they can only have one game scheduled with a school not in that group
3) Work out the TV deals so that each team in that group gets the same amount of $ and that marquee games are scheduled evenly each week and within each time slot of those weeks
And everybody winds up with a record between 4-8 and 8-4.A smart CFB Tsar would
1)make the Top 48-60 schools independent
2) Mandate that they can only have one game scheduled with a school not in that group
3) Work out the TV deals so that each team in that group gets the same amount of $ and that marquee games are scheduled evenly each week and within each time slot of those weeks
There would absolutely be more parity in terms of records. But, that's mostly because most P5 teams currently schedule 3-4 easy W's to pad their record that nobody wants to watch and nobody but the 3rd string kids want to play in.And everybody winds up with a record between 4-8 and 8-4.
The simplest solution is a 40 team upper division of football separate from the NCAA. Four ten team conferences, and you play 3 games outside of your pod with whoever you want. The champs from each conference advance to a 4 team playoff.
Who says no to that besides the "have nots"?
A smart CFB Tsar would
1)make the Top 48-60 schools independent
2) Mandate that they can only have one game scheduled with a school not in that group
3) Work out the TV deals so that each team in that group gets the same amount of $ and that marquee games are scheduled evenly each week and within each time slot of those weeks
Big Ten & SEC contracts are so large that idk why theyd agree to a ~40 upper league
Yeah I think the opportune time to arrange something like a 40-50 team "upper league" was a decade+ ago. The Big 10 and SEC are so far ahead of the rest of the conferences $ wise that a "Big 10 East and West" and "SEC East and West" that equal 40+ team is far more likely than tearing it all down. We're past the point of no return.They won't. They'll be the NFC & AFC of the P1.
It'll be whatever # brings in the most amount of money per team.
LSU in the SouthThe simplest solution is a 40 team upper division of football separate from the NCAA. Four ten team conferences, and you play 3 games outside of your pod with whoever you want. The champs from each conference advance to a 4 team playoff. The conferences are strictly regional like a professional league with an emphasis on rivalries. This would add maximum emphasis to the regular season while still preserving a "fair" way of crowning a champion.
This would look something like:
WEST
USC
UCLA
Oregon
Washington
Arizona
Arizona State
Utah
Colorado
BYU
?
SOUTH
Texas
Texas A&M
Oklahoma
Mississippi
Alabama
Auburn
Georgia
Florida
Tennessee
?
EAST
Florida State
Miami
Clemson
South Carolina
UNC
Virginia Tech
Pittsburgh
Penn State
West Virginia
?
NORTH
Michigan
Michigan State
Ohio State
Notre Dame
Wisconsin
Nebraska
Missouri
Iowa
?
?
Who says no to that besides the "have nots"?
I don’t think anyone gives a shit about Cal. But making our annual Stanford game into one of our five ACC games would protect that “rivalry” while opening up a date and saving us yet another game against some middleweight from the Carolinas. Smart move for us.Why would Notre Dame care in regard to what Stanford and/or Cal does?