The data tells the story.
A lot of the talking heads are focusing on Freeman’s composite score or blue chip ratio, but at the end of the day it’s about competing within that given year against the other teams in the nation, whether one particular year has more blue chip guys than the next or not.
From 2011-2022, Kelly had 6 classes finish within the top 10 nationally. 2013 #5, 2017 #10, 2018 #10, 2021 #9, 2022 #7. Even if you take 2022 away from BK (which I find absurd), some friends of mine have argued with me stating, “2022 is not BK’s class since it was technically signed under Freeman”, BK still had 5 top 10 classes. Also, 9 of those 12 classes finished between 260-284. Not exactly crappy numbers considering this year will likely be on the far low end of that.
Freeman’s first class in 2023 finished #12. Kelly’s classes from 2011-2022 averaged 11.9, with his highest finish at #5. His worst ever class was 2020 at #18. So, if you go by how BK did against the competition within the given years he recruited, he’s .1 higher than Freeman from 2023 at #12. Given the high likelihood we finish outside the top 12, I’d say Freeman’s average will get worse, widening the gap between he and BK.
I’m not arguing that Freeman isn’t more likable, appears to be a harder worker on the recruiting trail, is or isn’t a better recruiter, may or may not have success in both recruiting or on the field. I’m just looking at how BK did against the other top 10-15 college football teams in America within those given years, during the 12 classes he signed mentioned above. Even if one says Freeman is increasing said blue chip ratio, it appears to me that so is everyone else (considering Freeman’s average class ranking is worse than BK’s).
Just throwing out a different perspective since all I hear on IB is how Kelly sucked at recruiting, sucks as a human, and Freeman is far and away the better recruiter.