What would the players or the NFLPA have to gain by getting grass back in the stadiums other than player safety?Every story about this references a statement made by the NFLPA last April showing there were higher rates on turf annually for the previous 6 years. I have looked but cannot find a peer-reviewed study proving their claims. There are no NFLPA data regarding any other factors or even methodology that determined turf was at fault.
There was a study sponsored by the NFL showing the opposite, but I haven't dug into it yet, but I'm not expecting much.
Not saying the NFLPA are right or wrong. I just hate how media and fans lap this shit up with no criticality at all.
Someone should look into NFL injury rates on Sundays. I bet those are sky-high.
The team spends the vast majority of its time on a new indoor field. Figuring out natural grass in there will be the biggest challenge.
ND will probably go back to grass inside the stadium within 5 to 10 years.
The NFL PA reps are voted on. It looks cool to make noise, no matter how legitimate.What would the players or the NFLPA have to gain by getting grass back in the stadiums other than player safety?
Meanwhile the NFL and owners have money to save by keeping the turf.
Based on what evidence?
What would the players or the NFLPA have to gain by getting grass back in the stadiums other than player safety?
Meanwhile the NFL and owners have money to save by keeping the turf.
NFLPA is worthless. Leaders of it probably bought offWhat if there were more important factors than just turf v grass that the NFLPA has now spent 6 years ignoring?
It would be a first. I haven't seen any teams switch back to grass, not any north of the Mason Dixon line anyway. The only teams I know that switched back are Arkansas and Ole Miss, both southern teams that aren't as affected as northern teams when it comes to weather on surfaces.Health and safety, public perception, and it's what the vast majority of players prefer to play on.
I have a hard time seeing all of this being ignored in the coming years. ND can figure it out.
I believe the Texas AD has also said they plan on going back to grass but, again, a southern team.It would be a first. I haven't seen any teams switch back to grass, not any north of the Mason Dixon line anyway. The only teams I know that switched back are Arkansas and Ole Miss, both southern teams that aren't as affected as northern teams when it comes to weather on surfaces.
It would be a first. I haven't seen any teams switch back to grass, not any north of the Mason Dixon line anyway. The only teams I know that switched back are Arkansas and Ole Miss, both southern teams that aren't as affected as northern teams when it comes to weather on surfaces.
I wish they had grass, kept it well, and then let it grow out a few weeks before USC, or OSU, showed up.
Agree NDBI’ve never understood this line of thinking. Both teams have to play on the field, so it’s going to “slow down” ND players too.
Agree NDB
1976 ND vs. Pitt. I get to my seat and see the grass is noticeably longer and tell the wife it's to slow down Tony Dorsett. Second play from scrimmage, Dorsett goes off tackle for about a 70YD TD. lol
I don't know, I would rather race Husain Bolt in a wheat field than on a track.
Michigan State reverted.It would be a first. I haven't seen any teams switch back to grass, not any north of the Mason Dixon line anyway. The only teams I know that switched back are Arkansas and Ole Miss, both southern teams that aren't as affected as northern teams when it comes to weather on surfaces.
I think there will be a slow trickle down effect in the coming years. The Bills are switching back to grass in 2026 when their new stadium opens, for example.
We might not see every program switch, but I'd bet most of the big and wealthy programs will switch to grass at some point.
Good info, I couldn't find anything at first other than Arkansas and Ole Miss.Michigan State reverted.
Iowa has flipped back and forth
Michigan has flipped back and forth
Pitt (unfair I guess since they demo'ed their stadium and share with Steelers)
Temple (again, unfair with stadium share)
Iowa State
Colorado
Ohio State has flipped back and forth
Northwestern
Kent State has flipped back and forth
Having grown up playing soccer in OH and then moving to the south while my daughter played soccer I was very envious of her getting to play on Bermuda grass. Such a great surface to play sports on.For NFL teams, those stadiums get rented out for a lot of events besides football. Much easier to prep with artificial turf and less $$$ involved.
Purdue has Prescription Turf they invented decades ago that has some type of irrigation and drainage system that allows the grass to hold up quite well. It's actually Bermuda grass that is more prevalent in the south.
It helps that Purdue has a substantial Turf Management department of folks to draw on, that’s for sure.For NFL teams, those stadiums get rented out for a lot of events besides football. Much easier to prep with artificial turf and less $$$ involved.
Purdue has Prescription Turf they invented decades ago that has some type of irrigation and drainage system that allows the grass to hold up quite well. It's actually Bermuda grass that is more prevalent in the south.
That's a little different though. It's a new stadium with a canopy shielding 65% of the stadium from elements. Plus they've got some kind of "coil" system that will be build underground to help keep the surface warm.
I wish they had grass, kept it well, and then let it grow out a few weeks before USC, or OSU, showed up.