Who to believe, yo.
Tom Nichols thread.
Seriously?? 35+ years later this is their tally?Well the official USSR death count of Chernobyl is 31.
Personally, I will continue to believe that will never happen until I see it happen. I fully believe the Kremlin is alluding to the threat of it because they don't want NATO to get involved in Ukraine.Best / most important post in the thread.
Someone inside Russia needs to take him out. Hopefully it’s 100k insurrectionists who REALLY know how to storm a capital, though a fed up general will do.
At this point, if Putin isn’t neutralized I expect him to go nuclear.
Who to believe, yo.
I suppose since the USSR collapsed a short time later, the USSR was not going to be updating an official USSR tally.Seriously?? 35+ years later this is their tally?
My Old Man (not named Mike though) was a missile officer in the 80's and 90's. If Russia's nuclear deal is set up like ours, I think it only takes 1/3 missile officers to type in the code and turn the key to launch. So who knows.If he has enough of his mind left to assess consequences he will never "go nuclear."
Even a tactical nuke destroys not only residents at the drop location but makes a wide circle unusable for anything else, including whatever the hell he wants Ukrainian territory for. There is also the wind. Depositing his radioactive fallout to the east screws his Crimea properties/resource moving plans, and if wind goes as with Chernobyl, then it would be heading north to Belarus and Russia itself. Remember that Chernobyl was not an explosion in the bomb sense but a gas rupture propelled by heat and internal pressure. It still affected a LOT of territory. It is my not-so-well-informed opinion, but based on some earlier years comments I read, that if he orders use of the Russian arsenal in any way other than national survival, the generals will not follow.
The only miniscule scenario involving nukes would be a very small tactical nuke in Ukraine's center probably, to keep the radioactive cloud well away from NATO countries and his own eastern Ukraine designs. That's a VERY fine line to walk.
Takes two peopleMy Old Man (not named Mike though) was a missile officer in the 80's and 90's. If Russia's nuclear deal is set up like ours, I think it only takes 1/3 missile officers to type in the code and turn the key to launch. So who knows.
I doubt things go nuclear unless the US/NATO decided to step in, which seems unlikely.
Hopefully the two parties can get together and make a deal. Lots of dead folks on both sides right now and that's very sad.
Yeah...I think there is 6 guys in the facility (maybe more) at any given time. Had they not moved the missiles out of ND I'd probably be in one now lol.Takes two people
Per US Air Force Instruction (AFI) 91-104, "the two-person concept" is designed to prevent accidental or malicious launch of nuclear weapons by a single individual.
They may not find any. Supply shortages, with them having to move back a little in certain areas, along with getting surrounded outside of Kyiv they're at best getting a standstill. If the additional support weapons arrive soon, Ukraine may start pushing them back from where they came.Russia is looking for exit ramps but is unlikely to take one that does not involve Ukraine ceding territory so that they can claim “victory.”
Ukraine is a country of 40 million people. Against a country with over 4x that. They can push back Russia on a temporary basis. But the math works out on way and one way only.They may not find any. Supply shortages, with them having to move back a little in certain areas, along with getting surrounded outside of Kyiv they're at best getting a standstill. If the additional support weapons arrive soon, Ukraine may start pushing them back from where they came.
Disagree. Ukraine doesn't need to sweep Moscow. Ukraine needs to kill enough Russians and prolong the war until Russians lose the appetite to support Putin or the war. Driving the forces out of the North is very possible, but will take time. Russia will surely dig in and secure their new land bridge in the South and demand territory ceded there. That's where things get dicey.Ukraine is a country of 40 million people. Against a country with over 4x that. They can push back Russia on a temporary basis. But the math works out on way and one way only.
Ukraine's best hope is to either make a deal or for Russia to have an uprising. The concept of a legitimate military victory is scarce unless Russia is willing to tolerate losing... because if Russia truly wants to win... they will.
Ho Chi Minh and the Taliban don’t keep score like you when it comes to fighting wars.Ukraine is a country of 40 million people. Against a country with over 4x that. They can push back Russia on a temporary basis. But the math works out on way and one way only.
Ukraine's best hope is to either make a deal or for Russia to have an uprising. The concept of a legitimate military victory is scarce unless Russia is willing to tolerate losing... because if Russia truly wants to win... they will.
Very true. Has anyone in Europe ever given us a reason to think they'll wage that type of insurgency though? It's a continent of weak people. They are broke around the time my grandparents were born.Ho Chi Minh and the Taliban don’t keep score like you when it comes to fighting wars.
"pundits and street corner commentators?" Would you be SHOCKED (cue Casablanca) to find them here?Weapons provided in package:
1. Bayraktar shoot-and-return drones
2. Switchblade (Kamakazi) drones
3. Stinger anti-aircraft missiles (800+600 already handed over.) These are man-carried.
4. Javelin anti-tank missiles (2000 of these) These are heat-seekers with thermal image guidance.
5. other less "sexy" stuff, and other "why should we tell you (and the Russians?") stuff.
Expenditures of non-declaration-of-war nature such as this are discretionary to the executive branch entirely, unless there is some direct "local" issue involved. It is the domain of the Executive to manage international affairs.
Objections by pundits and street corner commentators about not giving Ukraine the latest technology are naive as to big picture war strategy. We do not want to risk capture of latest tech. A similar thing just happened to the Russians when an electronic warfare unit of theirs was captured. This unit is going directly to NATO intelligence where the US will take it apart to reveal all secrets and vulnerabilities.
No, my surmise is otherwise.Best / most important post in the thread.
Someone inside Russia needs to take him out. Hopefully it’s 100k insurrectionists who REALLY know how to storm a capital, though a fed up general will do.
At this point, if Putin isn’t neutralized I expect him to go nuclear.
Have you paid any attention to last month in Ukraine?Very true. Has anyone in Europe ever given us a reason to think they'll wage that type of insurgency though? It's a continent of weak people. They are broke around the time my grandparents were born.