<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>We the best ever. </p>— Toot Daddy Fresh™ (@DaVarisDaniels) <a href="https://twitter.com/DaVarisDaniels/status/518885825405521920">October 5, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Could be about the hearing, or about the Colts (believe are his favourite team), or about that PE team he's coaching.
Discuss.
It was about the interhall team he coaches... They beat the defending champs today.
On a side note, the girls squad I coach got blown out. Bad.
It was about the interhall team he coaches... They beat the defending champs today.
On a side note, the girls squad I coach got blown out. Bad.
... On a side note, the girls squad I coach got blown out. Bad.
Notre Dame re-iterated that it is willing to self-sanction its football program should any of the No. 6 Fighting Irish's five suspended players be determined to have been ineligible during past competition.
The school released a statement Sunday saying that the hearings for the players were completed Friday, and that decisions will be communicated to affected student-athletes as deliberations conclude.
The school also said that it will not disclose the results, although affected students may if they wish to do so.
"If it is determined that student-athletes would have been ineligible during past competition, Notre Dame will voluntarily impose appropriate sanctions, report our findings to the NCAA, and await its independent review," Paul J. Browne, vice president for public affairs and communications, said in the release.
The school acknowledged the potential difficulty that its honor code process can cause students, regardless of culpability, and said it is working to resolve such situations.
Notre Dame described the atypical nature of this investigation.
"Due to the complexity of cases involving multiple disciplines, comprehensive honesty committees were impaneled to review memoranda and extensive exhibits compiled in connection with the general counsel's initial inquiry, interview witnesses and the subjects of the hearings, and potentially impose sanctions subject to appeal," Browne said in the release. "A faculty reporter was also appointed to review voluminous material collected during the general counsel's investigation to identify cases for the comprehensive committees' review."
Notre Dame had announced Aug. 15 that it was withholding DaVaris Daniels, Ishaq Williams, Kendall Moore and KeiVarae Russell from practices and games as it investigated academic misconduct. The school later announced, on Aug. 28, that Eilar Hardy would be withheld as well, and coach Brian Kelly said that same day that the investigation was complete.
The school had said that its office of general counsel initiated an immediate investigation when the compliance office was referred to evidence July 29. The five suspended players attend classes and have been welcomed back into the football complex, are dining with teammates and working out with Irish strength and conditioning coach Paul Longo.
Kelly has chosen all along to keep the players out of team meetings.
Sorry if this has already been posted in this thread (too much to try and filter thru and read)....but I have a question that I hope someone on here can answer....It goes without saying that of course we want our "Fab Five" cleared for a multitude of reasons (eligibility, not vacating wins, tarnishing the program, that they can eventually graduate with a degree from ND, etc, etc...) but if they're not c;eared and are suspended even longer, could it POSSIBLY be a good thing for the team in the long run?? We have guys that have blended very well together, have that in-game team chemistry, learning one another's tendencies (strength's and weaknesses), and that even if these guys came back this week or next week, they wouldnt be up to Week 7 or 8 "game speed"....after we destroy N.C. this week, we have the reigning and defending Nat'l Champs the following Saturday.....would those fab five be ready for that? Or would it be better, team -wise, to not rock the boat on chemistry and the intangibles and intricate nuances of the game to not have these guys comeback until AFTER the FSU game? Sorry for the loaded post with circular questions.....but there's a lot that goes into just wanting these guys back with the team versus what might actually be the best thing in the long run and maybe we shldnt rush them on the field, as it could, in theory, do more harm than good....call me stupid or whatever...just thought I'd ask the questions and get some other ppl's thoughts on the subject....
Yes we need Russell covering the slot but he definitely need live reps this week. Farley will get exposed against fsu
The players are free to discuss the results of the hearing.The University wont be revealing the results.This is absurd.If they are guilty or innocent a PR from the University should be the proper format.
Well all we know is that the hearings are over. That the university won't talk about them and the players are free to talk about them. I see nothing about a decision in that at all. The hearings took place, the hearings are over and the decision is yet to come.
That the university released its statement over the weekend leads me to believe that the results might be in by the end of today.
Otherwise, I would think they would've released the statement during regular business hours today.