Ndaccountant
Old Hoss
- Messages
- 8,370
- Reaction score
- 5,771
I don't "do" texts.
Besides, I require more than 40 "characters."
Oh. You weren't "talking" to me.
Never mind ...
Is this yours?Throw Grammar from the Train
I don't "do" texts.
Besides, I require more than 40 "characters."
Oh. You weren't "talking" to me.
Never mind ...
In my response I am in no way saying she is innocent. Just saying it could be possible. There are so many stories from a players GF, to this girl, to writing of papers, to only proofreading, to............the list goes on. If I was in a position similar to hers, named in a scandal (I would never sleep with a guy, multiple guys, write a paper for a ND student, or trade sex for papers) I would shut my internet life down too. Look at our small internet board of fans and alums and look how we act and react at times. And a small number, or none, of us know the real story at this point.
Sleep tight. Don't let the bedbugs bite.
To try to get this thread back on topic.
I know that Chiro might be full of it, and there's really no objective reason to think his 'source' has good info, but as the season approaches, my kool-aid jar is on auto-fill and I'm in full fledge believer mode (after we lose our first game, I'll start smashing all kool-aid jars).
But here's why I believe he's onto something. When he first said 3 were cleared and will be at practice Monday, everyone backed him, even CaliDomer and I think NDHoosier from IE said he's as solid as they come.
He turned out to be wrong, and no one ran him off the site, and not even one poster called him out. Remember epitome? Clearly Chiro is above his level (and/or DD is a more civil board than IE, hard to imagine, lol).
Next, after being wrong, he doesn't come out and say 'My info was wrong, I'm sorry guys'. He says he stands by what he was told and thinks that three will be cleared soon (albeit not Monday), and still, no back lash from anyone on the site.
I know this isn't much, but this is why I believe his info. He clearly IMO has a ton of respect on that board and for all we know, he's the ironman8/TP/Koon/Lax of that board (commence laughter..... at Ironman).
.
![]()
Still don't believe it.
Hey guys, my sources tell me that 2 are about to released.
![]()
I mean, the only violation I see is that they have to be covered up. Set my people free!
To try to get this thread back on topic.
/QUOTE]
![]()
Back to the topic. There is a way this all fits together nicely. Three could have had proof they did the original writing, whether the girl did super editing or not. Some may have jumped the gun and assumed that is where this all ends. Now the focus may be if she did too much work, on some other detail require contacting additional students to testify, or require a meeting of the Honesty Council.
And as several reported, one can never tell the way things will fall, with a decision left to a group of individuals . . .
We need an "IE Digest" thread. No discussion allowed, just actual news. You can only post there if you have a Commitment, Decommitment, Injury, Suspension/Reinstatement/Investigation, or University news. Conversations can continue in those topics' respective threads, but it would be nice one-stop shopping for someone popping in for actual updates.
Agreed.
How dafuq did you get gold username?
I paid $12 (real United States currency).How dafuq did you get gold username?
go to the vbplaza
I paid $12 (real United States currency).
Ulukinateme, you gotta give a warning 'do not open at work!', lol.
As to the whole "one paper for more than one class" thingy, my junior year at ND I researched and wrote a paper for one class. Two other classes required papers that dealt with the same time period or a related topic.
I was able to incorporate the same core, grind-it-out research and personal point of view in each. I was in academic heaven. One area of scrutiny from three perspectives. I did additional reading and research (with appropriate citations) for the first and the subsequent two. My quest to schedule classes with interplay paid off.
Each paper was written to be appropriate to the class and topic. I had no internet, tutor or editor. I spent more time in the library on additional research. I had no outside help.
OK, OK, I had classmates to get stoned with and bounce ideas back and forth with, but no dot matrix printer to put print on paper. No e-mail pixels on screens either.
As I remember, I got two As and an A- on the papers.
We need an "IE Digest" thread. No discussion allowed, just actual news. You can only post there if you have a Commitment, Decommitment, Injury, Suspension/Reinstatement/Investigation, or University news. Conversations can continue in those topics' respective threads, but it would be nice one-stop shopping for someone popping in for actual updates.
This.We need an "IE Digest" thread. No discussion allowed, just actual news. You can only post there if you have a Commitment, Decommitment, Injury, Suspension/Reinstatement/Investigation, or University news. Conversations can continue in those topics' respective threads, but it would be nice one-stop shopping for someone popping in for actual updates.
To try to get this thread back on topic.
I know that Chiro might be full of it, and there's really no objective reason to think his 'source' has good info, but as the season approaches, my kool-aid jar is on auto-fill and I'm in full fledge believer mode (after we lose our first game, I'll start smashing all kool-aid jars).
But here's why I believe he's onto something. When he first said 3 were cleared and will be at practice Monday, everyone backed him, even CaliDomer and I think NDHoosier from IE said he's as solid as they come.
He turned out to be wrong, and no one ran him off the site, and not even one poster called him out. Remember epitome? Clearly Chiro is above his level (and/or DD is a more civil board than IE, hard to imagine, lol).
Next, after being wrong, he doesn't come out and say 'My info was wrong, I'm sorry guys'. He says he stands by what he was told and thinks that three will be cleared soon (albeit not Monday), and still, no back lash from anyone on the site.
I know this isn't much, but this is why I believe his info. He clearly IMO has a ton of respect on that board and for all we know, he's the ironman8/TP/Koon/Lax of that board (commence laughter..... at Ironman).
.
As to the whole "one paper for more than one class" thingy, my junior year at ND I researched and wrote a paper for one class. Two other classes required papers that dealt with the same time period or a related topic.
I was able to incorporate the same core, grind-it-out research and personal point of view in each. I was in academic heaven. One area of scrutiny from three perspectives. I did additional reading and research (with appropriate citations) for the first and the subsequent two. My quest to schedule classes with interplay paid off.
Each paper was written to be appropriate to the class and topic. I had no internet, tutor or editor. I spent more time in the library on additional research. I had no outside help.
OK, OK, I had classmates to get stoned with and bounce ideas back and forth with, but no dot matrix printer to put print on paper. No e-mail pixels on screens either.
As I remember, I got two As and an A- on the papers.